蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 3359|回复: 7
收起左侧

[GMP相关] HBEL应该是清洁验证的接收限度的基础吗?

[复制链接]
药士
发表于 2017-11-16 09:18:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
Should an HBEL (Health Based Exposure Limit) be the Basis for Acceptance Values for Manufacturing Cleaning Validation?

By Don Elinski | November 15, 2017 | Compliance, FDA, Regulatory Affairs, Science & Technology | Like |


The answer to the question of whether current cleaning validation limits generally in use in the industry (1/1000th of the minimum therapeutic dose of a drug product or 10 ppm) should be revised in favor of a Health Based Exposure Limit (HBEL) based limit was one of the major discussions at a “Workshop on the Generation and use of Health-Based Exposure Limits” held on 20-21st June 2017 at the European Medicines Agency.
The answer for many legacy products with well-established clinical safety profiles would be that an HBEL based on 1/1000th of the minimal therapeutic dose would be considered a sufficiently conservative approach and conventional cleaning validation limits would likely be safe. However, a firm would need to identify whether their compounds would present risk of causing adverse health effects in exposed individuals. Often a reasonable adverse exposure limit can be easily derived based on readily available data, although some toxicological expertise may be needed. Once derived, the limit can be compared to existing Cleaning Validation Limits.
A case study was presented as part of the workshop describing a firm that had a wide range of legacy products (European Federation of Manufacturing Industries and Association, Case Study – Evaluation of Health Based Exposure Limits and Potential Impact on manufacturing equipment and Cleaning Limits, Gretchen Allison, Pfizer Global Quality Operations-Validation Team Leader). The presentation includes a flow chart that can guide a firm through the decision-making process of whether to apply Conventional Cleaning Validation limits or HBEL.
While European regulators plan to remain flexible on the enforcement of HBEL, the focus may be growing for discussion on the direction of future Cleaning Validation acceptance limits. ASTM WK15778 Cleaning Process Development and Validation Standard has met he requirements of all technical balloting on September 15, 2017, which means that this Standard will soon be published. This Guide will provide a framework for science- and risk= based approaches to developing and validating Cleaning Processes for pharmaceutical products, biological products, and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). This document addresses how risk characterization and risk assessment can be used to develop cleaning validation limits. This Guide will provide a scientific and risk-based approach to developing cleaning processes for pharmaceutical and biological products, including both APIs and finished products.
Neither the EU or FDA endorse any specific limits for Cleaning Validation, but recommend that acceptance limits be scientifically based and justifiable. As noted in the workshop discussions, many of the problems seen by inspectors relate to poor application of long-standing GMP expectations in cross-contamination control rather than specific issues of acceptance limits.


回复

使用道具 举报

药王
发表于 2023-1-21 15:03:26 | 显示全部楼层
好资料,谢谢共享
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2019-2-23 15:35:02 | 显示全部楼层
beiwei5du 发表于 2019-2-21 21:46
应该是pharmatech上的一篇文章。

理解了 难怪总觉得在哪里看过但又找不到规范
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2019-2-21 21:46:40 | 显示全部楼层
p38034 发表于 2019-2-21 15:55
你好,请问此流程图是引用于什么指南或规范

应该是pharmatech上的一篇文章。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2019-2-21 15:55:36 | 显示全部楼层

你好,请问此流程图是引用于什么指南或规范

点评

应该是pharmatech上的一篇文章。  详情 回复 发表于 2019-2-21 21:46
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2017-11-16 11:33:13 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢很好的文件
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-16 10:13:49 | 显示全部楼层
这个例子是如何理解的呢???
举例2.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-16 09:37:12 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2017-11-16 10:05 编辑

流程图
flowchart.gif
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-8-2 23:47

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表