蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 58529|回复: 19
收起左侧

[药界资讯] 【分享】跨国药企的创办史

[复制链接]
药徒
发表于 2013-8-16 08:41:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
【分享】跨国药企的创办史


药厂的百年老店很多, 在此专门收集跨国公司的创办史和发展史,供大家了解学习, 希望各位补充

跨国药企的创办史

施贵宝 1858
默克 1851
罗氏 1896
礼来 1876

施贵宝的创办史

History

Our company has a strong legacy of innovation that began in New York in 1858 when Edward R. Squibb, M.D., founded a pharmaceutical company in Brooklyn, and in 1887 when two friends, William McLaren Bristol and John Ripley Myers purchased a struggling drug manufacturing firm in Clinton. Together, they laid the foundation for our company today — a global BioPharma leader that continues this legacy of innovation.



As a young U.S. Navy doctor, Edward Robinson Squibb (1819-1900) was so unimpressed by the quality of medicines available on ships during the Mexican War that he pitched the unfit drugs overboard. In 1858, he founded his own pharmaceutical laboratory in Brooklyn, New York. E.R. Squibb, M.D. was dedicated to the production of consistently pure medicines.1858

Squibb became the source of medicines for the Union Army during the Civil War. He invented the Squibb pannier—a compact wooden medicine chest used on the battlefield—filled with some 50 medicines to treat casualties. The chest sold for about $100, and included ether and chloroform for use as an anesthetic during amputations, quinine and whiskey to treat symptoms of malaria, and herbal treatments for dysentery and other diseases that ravaged the unsanitary military camps.



William McLaren Bristol (left) and his friend, John Ripley Myers, invested $5,000 into the Clinton Pharmaceutical Company, a failing drug manufacturing firm located in Clinton, New York. The company was officially incorporated on December 13, 1887, with Bristol as president and Myers as vice president.1887Squibb retired in 1895 and passed most of the responsibility for managing the firm to his sons, Charles and Edward. The company became known as E.R. Squibb & Sons.1895


Bristol-Myers first nationally recognized product, termed a poor man’s spa by chief chemist J. Leroy Webber, was a laxative mineral salt that, when dissolved in water, reproduced the taste and effects of the natural mineral waters of Bohemia. Christened Sal Hepatica, the new product sold modestly at first. By 1903 however, Sal Hepatica was a best seller.1898

Bristol and Myers changed the name from Clinton to Bristol, Myers Company (a hyphen would replace the comma after Myers’ death in 1899, when the company became a corporation). Not until 1900 did Bristol-Myers break through into the black—where it has remained ever since.

Another runaway success of this era was Ipana toothpaste, the first toothpaste to include a disinfectant in its formula and thus protect against infection of bleeding gums. The demand for Sal Hepatica and Ipana transformed Bristol-Myers from a regional company into an international one.

The Squibb sons sold the company to Lowell M. Palmer and Theodore Weicker, and the company became incorporated. That same year, land was purchased in New Brunswick, New Jersey, for establishment of an ether production plant. Around the same time, the prototype of the Squibb logo was designed. The logo represented product uniformity, purity, efficacy and reliability based on research.1905

回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:42:24 | 显示全部楼层
默克创办史
http://www.merck.com/about/our-history/
We've done great things in the past. Today, we're doing great things for the future.

Merck has a long and rich history of working to improve people's health and well-being. Through the years, our researchers have helped to find new ways to treat and prevent illness - from the discovery of vitamin B1, to the first measles vaccine, to cold remedies and antacids, to the first statins to treat high cholesterol. Our scientists also have helped develop many products to improve animal health, including vaccines and antibiotics.

While we are proud of our past, we are enthusiastic about the future of this new company and we are excited to help create a healthier, brighter future for people around the world.

Company Perspectives:

The mission of Merck is to provide society with superior products and services--innovations and solutions that improve the quality of life and satisfy customer needs&mdash? provide employees with meaningful work and advancement opportunities and investors with a superior rate of return. Key Dates:

Key Dates:

1668:Friedrich Jacob Merck purchases an apothecary in Darmstadt, Germany. 1827:Heinrich Emmanuel Merck transforms the pharmacy into a drug manufactory. 1887:The German firm, E. Merck AG, sets up a sales office in the United States. 1891:George Merck, grandson of Heinrich Merck, joins the U.S. branch, known as Merck & Company. 1899:The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy is first published. 1903:U.S. production begins at a site in Rahway, New Jersey. 1917:Entrance of United States into World War I leads to severing of relationship between Merck & Co. and E. Merck AG. 1925:George W. Merck takes over as president, succeeding his father. 1927:Company merges with Powers-Weightman-Rosengarten and is incorporated as Merck & Co., Inc.

1940s:Merck's laboratories make a series of discoveries: vitamin B12, cortisone, streptomycin. 1953:Company merges with Sharp & Dohme, Incorporated. 1965:Henry W. Gadsen is named CEO and launches an ill-advised diversification program. 1976:John J. Honran succeeds Gadsen and reemphasizes drug research. 1979:Company begins marketing Enalapril, a high-blood-pressure inhibitor whose annual sales eventually reach $550 million. 1982:Merck enters into a partnership with Astra AB to sell that company's products in the United States. 1985r. P. Roy Vagelos takes over as CEO; Vasotec, a treatment for congestive heart failure, is introduced. 1988:Vasotec becomes Merck's first billion-dollar-a-year drug. 1989:Over-the-counter medication joint venture is created with Johnson & Johnson. 1992:Zocor, a cholesterol-fighter, is introduced and eventually becomes a blockbuster. 1993:Medco Containment Services Inc., a drug distributor, is acquired for $6.6 billion. 1994:Raymond V. Gilmartin is named chairman and CEO, becoming the first outsider so named. 1995:Company divests its specialty chemicals businesses. 1999:Astra pays Merck $1.8 billion stemming from a joint venture between the companies and from Astra's merger with Zeneca; arthritis medication Vioxx makes its debut.

Company History:

Merck & Co., Inc. is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. Among the company's most important prescription drugs are Vioxx, a painkiller used to treat arthritis; Zocor and Mevacor, used to modify cholesterol levels; Cozaar, Prinivil, and Vasotec, hypertension medications; Fosamax, for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis; Pepcid, an ulcer medication; Primaxin and Noroxin, antibiotics; Crixivan, a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV; Singulair, an asthma treatment; Cosopt, Timoptic, and Trusopt, all used to treat glaucoma; Propecia, a hair loss remedy; and several vaccines, including M-M-R II, chicken pox vaccine Varivax, and hepatitis B vaccine Recombivax HB. Merck also develops, manufactures, and markets pharmaceuticals through a number of joint ventures, including: a partnership with Johnson & Johnson that concentrates on designing and commercializing over-the-counter versions of prescription medications, such as Pepcid AC; a venture with Aventis A.G. focusing on the European vaccine market; and another partnership with Aventis, this one concentrating on animal health and poultry genetics. Nearly half of the company's revenues are generated by Merck-Medco Managed Care, a pharmacy benefit management subsidiary principally involved in selling prescription drugs through managed prescription drug programs. Merck spends more than $2 billion each year on pharmaceutical research and development. About 40 percent of the company's human health product sales are generated outside the United States.

German Origins

Merck's beginnings can be traced back to Friedrich Jacob Merck's 1668 purchase of an apothecary in Darmstadt, Germany, called 'At the Sign of the Angel.' Located next to a castle moat, this store remained in the Merck family for generations.

The pharmacy was transformed by Heinrich Emmanuel Merck into a drug manufactory in 1827. His first products were morphine, codeine, and cocaine. By the time he died in 1855, products made by his company, known as E. Merck AG, were used worldwide. In 1887 E. Merck sent a representative, Theodore Weicker, to the United States to set up a sales office. Weicker (who would go on to own drug powerhouse Bristol-Myers Squibb) was joined by George Merck, the 24-year-old grandson of Heinrich Emmanuel Merck in 1891. In 1899, the younger Merck and Weicker acquired a 150-acre plant site in Rahway, New Jersey, and started production in 1903. Weicker left the firm the following year.

The manufacture of drugs and chemicals at this site began in 1903. This same location housed the corporate headquarters of Merck & Co. and four of its divisions, as well as research laboratories and chemical production facilities, into the 1990s. Once known as 'Merck Woods,' the land surrounding the original plant was used to hunt wild game and corral domestic animals. In fact, George Merck kept a flock of 15 to 20 sheep on the grounds to test the effectiveness of an animal disinfectant. The sheep became a permanent part of the Rahway landscape.

The year 1899 also marked the first year the Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy was published. In 1983, the manual entered its 14th edition. A New York Times review rated it 'the most widely used medical text in the world.'

In 1917, upon the entrance of the United States into World War I, George Merck, fearing anti-German sentiment, turned over a sizable portion of Merck stock to the Alien Property Custodian of the United States. This portion represented the company interest held by E. Merck AG, thereby ending Merck & Co.'s connection to its German parent. At the end of the war, Merck was rewarded for his patriotic leadership; the Alien Property Custodian sold Merck shares, worth $3 million, to the public. George Merck retained control of the corporation, and by 1919 the company was once again entirely public-owned.

1920s Through 1950s: Growth Through Mergers and R & D

By 1926, the year George Merck died, his son George W. Merck had been acting president for more than a year. The first major event of the younger Merck's tenure--which would last 25 years--was the 1927 merger with Philadelphia-based Powers-Weightman-Rosengarten, a pharmaceutical firm best known for antimalarial quinine. Following the merger, Merck incorporated his company as Merck & Co., Inc. The merger enabled Merck & Co. to increase its sales from $6 million in 1925 to more than $13 million in 1929. With the resultant expansion in capital, Merck initiated and directed the Merck legacy for pioneering research and development. In 1933, he established a large laboratory and recruited prominent chemists and biologists to produce new pharmaceutical products. Their efforts had far-reaching effects. En route to researching cures for pernicious anemia, Merck scientists discovered vitamin B12. Its sales, both as a therapeutic drug and as a constituent of animal feed, were massive.

The 1940s continued to be a decade of discoveries in drug research, especially in the field of steroid chemistry. In the early 1940s, a Merck chemist synthesized cortisone from ox bile, which led to the discovery of cortisone's anti-inflammation properties. In 1943, streptomycin, a revolutionary antibiotic used for tuberculosis and other infections, was isolated by a Merck scientist.

Despite the pioneering efforts and research success under George W. Merck's leadership, the company struggled during the postwar years. There were no promising new drugs to speak of, and there was intense competition from foreign companies underselling Merck products, as well as from former domestic consumers beginning to manufacture their own drugs. Merck found itself in a precarious financial position.

A solution was found in 1953 when Merck merged with Sharp & Dohme, Incorporated, a drug company with a similar history and reputation. Sharp and Dohme began as an apothecary shop in 1845 in Baltimore, Maryland. Its success in the research and development of such important products as sulfa drugs, vaccines, and blood plasma products matched the successes of Merck. The merger, however, was more than the combination of two industry leaders. It provided Merck with a new distribution network and marketing facilities to secure major customers. For the first time, Merck could market and sell drugs under its own name.

At the time of George W. Merck's death in 1957, company sales had surpassed $100 million annually. Although Albert W. Merck, a direct descendant of Friedrich Jacob Merck, continued to sit on the board of directors into the 1980s, the office of chief executive was never again held by a Merck family member.

1960s Through Mid-1980s: Diversifying, Reemphasizing Research, Surviving Various Difficulties

Henry W. Gadsen became CEO in 1965 and, as was fashionable at the time, initiated a program of diversification. Among the businesses acquired in the late 1960s and early 1970s were Calgon Corporation, a supplier of water treatment chemicals and services; Kelco, a maker of specialty chemicals; and Baltimore Aircoil, a maker of refrigeration and industrial cooling equipment. Many of these businesses were quickly divested after it was discovered that profits were hard to come by, but Calgon and Kelco remained part of Merck into the early 1990s. Under Gadsen's emphasis on diversification, Merck's pharmaceutical operations suffered.

In 1976, John J. Honran succeeded the 11-year reign of Gadsen. Honran was a quiet, unassuming man who had entered Merck as a legal counselor and then became the corporate director of public relations. But Honran's unobtrusive manner belied an aggressive management style. With pragmatic determination Honran not only continued the Merck tradition for innovation in drug research, but also improved a poor performance record on new product introduction to the market.

This problem was most apparent in the marketing of Aldomet, an antihypertensive agent. Once the research was completed, Merck planned to exploit the discovery by introducing an improved beta-blocker called Blocadren. Yet Merck was beaten to the market by its competitors. Furthermore, because the 17-year patent protection on a new drug discovery was about to expire, Aldomet was threatened by generic manufacturers. This failure to beat its competitors to the market is said to have cost the company $200 million in future sales. A similar sequence of events occurred with Indocin and Clinoril, two anti-inflammation drugs for arthritis.

Under Honran's regime, the company introduced a hepatitis vaccine, a treatment for glaucoma called Timoptic, and Ivomac, an antiparasitic for animals. In addition, while Honran remained strongly committed to financing a highly productive research organization, Merck began making improvements on research already performed by competitors. In 1979, for example, Merck began to market Enalapril, a high-blood-pressure inhibitor, similar to the drug Capoten, which was manufactured by Squibb. Sales for Enalapril reached $550 million in 1986. Honran also embarked on a more aggressive program for licensing foreign products. In 1982 Merck purchased rights to sell products from Swedish firm Astra AB in the United States; a similar arrangement was reached with Shionogi of Japan. Two years later the Merck-Astra agreement was transformed into a joint venture, Astra Merck Inc.

Honran's strategy proved very effective. Between 1981 and 1985, the company experienced a nine percent annual growth rate, and in 1985 the Wall Street Transcript awarded Honran the gold award for excellence in the ethical drug industry. He was commended for the company's advanced marketing techniques and its increased production. At the time of the award, projections indicated a company growth rate for the next five years of double the present rate.

In 1984, Honran claimed Merck had become the largest U.S.-based manufacturer of drugs in the three largest markets--the United States, Japan, and Europe. He attributed this success to three factors: a productive research organization; manufacturing capability that allowed for cost-efficient, high-quality production; and an excellent marketing organization. The following year, Honran resigned as CEO. In 1986, his successor, Dr. P. Roy Vagelos, a biochemist and the company's former head of research, also was awarded the ethical drug industry's gold award.

Although Merck's public image was generally good, it had its share of controversy. In 1974, a $35 million lawsuit was filed against Merck and 28 other drug manufacturers and distributors of diethylstilbestrol (DES). This drug, prescribed to pregnant women in the late 1940s and up until the early 1960s, ostensibly prevented miscarriages. The 16 original plaintiffs claimed that they developed vaginal cancer and other related difficulties because their mothers had taken the drug. Furthermore, the suit charged that DES was derived from Stilbene, a known carcinogen, and that no reasonable basis existed for claiming the drugs were effective in preventing miscarriages. (A year before the suit, the Federal Drug Administration, or FDA, banned the use of DES hormones as growth stimulants for cattle because tests revealed cancer-causing residues of the substance in some of the animals' livers. The FDA, however, did not conduct public hearings on this issue; consequently, a federal court overturned the ban.)

Under the plaintiffs' directive, the court asked the defendants to notify other possible victims and to establish early detection and treatment centers. More than 350 plaintiffs subsequently sought damages totaling some $350 billion.

Merck was not beleaguered by the DES lawsuit only. In 1975, the company's name was added to a growing list of U.S. companies involved in illegal payments abroad. The payoffs, issued to increase sales in certain African and Middle Eastern countries, came to the attention of Merck executives through the investigation of the Securities and Exchange Commission. While sales amounted to $40.4 million for that year in those areas of the foreign market, the report uncovered a total of $140,000 in bribes. Once the SEC revealed its report, Merck initiated an internal investigation and took immediate steps to prevent future illegal payments.

Later, Merck found itself beset with new difficulties. In its attempt to win hegemony in Japan, the second largest pharmaceutical market in the world, Merck purchased more than 50 percent of the Banyu Pharmaceutical Company of Tokyo. Partners since 1954 under a joint business venture called Nippon Merck-Banyu (NMB), the companies used Japanese detail men (or pharmaceutical sales representatives) to promote Merck products.

When NMB proved inefficient, however, Merck bought out its partner for $315.5 million--more than 30 times Banyu's annual earnings. The acquisition was made in 1982, and Merck was still in the process of bringing Banyu into line with its more aggressive and imaginative management style in the early 1990s.

Problems in labor relations surfaced during the spring of 1985 when Merck locked out 730 union employees at the Rahway plant after failing to agree to a new contract. For three months prior to the expiration of three union contracts, involving 4,000 employees, both sides negotiated a new settlement. When talks stalled, however, the company responded by locking out employees. The unresolved issues involved both wages and benefits.

By June 5, all 4,000 employees participated in a strike involving the Rahway plant and six other facilities across the nation. In West Point, Virginia, operations were halted when union picketers prevented nonstriking employees from entering the plant. Merck, however, was able to win a court-ordered injunction limiting picketing.

The strike proved to be the longest in Merck's history; but after 15 weeks an agreement was finally reached. A company request for the adoption of a two-tier wage system that would permanently pay new employees lower wages was rejected, as was a union demand for wage increases and cost-of-living adjustments during the first year. Nevertheless, Merck's reputation as an exceptional, high-paying workplace remained intact, and its subsequent contract agreements were amicable. In fact, Merck was ranked as one of the '100 Best Companies to Work for in America' and one of Working Mother magazine's '100 Best Companies for Working Mothers' since that ranking's 1986 inception.

Late 1980s and Early 1990s: Blockbuster Drugs, Joint Ventures, Medco

During the late 1980s, double-digit annual sales increases catapulted Merck to undisputed leadership of the pharmaceutical industry. CEO Vagelos's research direction in the 1960s and 1970s laid the foundation for Merck's drug 'bonanza' of the 1980s. Vasotec, a treatment for congestive heart failure, was introduced in 1985 and became Merck's first billion-dollar-a-year drug by 1988. Mevacor, a cholesterol-lowering drug introduced in 1987, and ivermectin, the world's top-selling animal health product, also contributed to the company's impressive growth. In the late 1980s, Merck was investing hundreds of millions of dollars in research and development--ten percent of the entire industry's total. Over the course of the decade, Merck's sales more than doubled, its profits tripled, and the company became the world's top-ranked drug company as well as one of Business Week's ten most valuable companies.

The company also was recognized for its heritage of social responsibility. In the 1980s, Merck made its drug for 'river blindness'--a parasitic infection prevalent in tropical areas and affecting 18 million people&mdash…ailable at no charge. In 1987, the company shared its findings regarding the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with competitors. These efforts reflected George W. Merck's assertion: 'Medicine is for the patients. It is not for the profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remembered it, the larger they have been.'

Growth did slow in the early 1990s, however, as Merck's drug pipeline dried up. Although the company maintained the broadest product line in the industry, its stable of new drugs was conspicuously absent of the 'blockbusters' that had characterized the previous decade, with one exception. In 1992 Merck introduced Zocor, a cholesterol-fighting drug that eventually surpassed $1 billion in annual sales and became the company's top-selling drug and one of the most successful pharmaceuticals in history.

In the meantime, Merck entered into a number of joint ventures that created alternative avenues of product development. In 1989 Merck joined with Johnson & Johnson in a venture to develop over-the-counter (OTC) versions of Merck's prescription medications, initially for the U.S. market, later expanded to Europe and Canada. Two years later Merck and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company formed a joint venture to research, manufacture, and sell pharmaceutical and imaging agent products. Merck and Connaught Laboratories, Inc. (later part of Aventis S.A.) jointly agreed in 1992 to develop combination vaccines in the United States. In 1994 Merck created a venture with a related company, Pasteur Merieux Connaught (which was also later part of Aventis S.A.), to market combination vaccines in Europe.

In 1993 Merck acquired Medco Containment Services Inc. for $6.6 billion. Medco was a mail-order distributor of drugs that was previously acquired by Martin Wygod in the early 1980s for $36 million. With the help of infamous investment banker Michael Milken, Wygod built Medco into a mass drug distribution system with $2.5 billion in revenues and $138 million in profits by 1992. The acquired company soon was renamed Merck-Medco Managed Care.

The wisdom of the purchase was debated among analysts. On one hand, it was regarded as making Merck more competitive in a U.S. healthcare industry dominated by cost-cutting managed care networks and health maintenance organizations. On the other hand, some observers noted that Merck's newest subsidiary would necessarily distribute competitors' drugs and that it had been a major proponent of discounting, which threatened to cut into Merck's R & D funds.

The Medco acquisition also complicated Vagelos's plans for a successor. Vagelos's choice, Richard J. Markham, resigned unexpectedly in mid-1993, just months before the CEO's anticipated retirement. Some observers speculated that 54-year-old Wygod, with his cost-cutting tendencies and marketing forte, was a likely successor, but he, too, resigned in March 1994. In the end, other internal candidates were bypassed as well in favor of the company's first outsider in Merck history to take the top job, Raymond V. Gilmartin. Named CEO in June 1994 and chairman in November of that year, Gilmartin had helped turn around medical equipment maker Becton Dickinson & Co. as that firm's chairman and CEO.

Mid-1990s and Beyond

Although Vagelos had built Merck into its position of industry preeminence by the time of his retirement, the entire pharmaceutical sector was in upheaval stemming from the growth of managed care. Sales and earnings growth were on the decline. Industry pressure resulted in large mergers that created Glaxo Wellcome plc and Novartis AG and toppled Merck from its position as the world's biggest drugmaker to a tie for third place with Germany's Hoechst Marion Roussel. Merck also was suffering from the difficult 18 months it took to find Vagelos's successor and the 'turf-conscious, defection-ridden' culture (so described by Business Week's Joseph Weber) that Vagelos left behind. One of Gilmartin's first major tasks, then, was to restructure the company's management team. In September 1994 he set up a 12-member management committee to help him run the company and plot strategies for growth. The management team included sales executives in Europe and Asia, the heads of the veterinary and vaccine divisions, the president of Merck-Medco, and executives from the research, manufacturing, finance, and legal areas. The creation of this committee helped to streamline and flatten Merck's organizational structure, fostered a greater degree of company teamwork, and halted the exodus of top managers that occurred during the Vagelos succession.

One of the management committee's first acts was to create a mission statement for Merck, which affirmed that the company was primarily a research-driven pharmaceutical company. Gilmartin then launched a divestment program, which jettisoned several noncore units, including a generic-drug operation and a managed mental-health care unit. In 1995 Merck sold its Kelco specialty chemicals division to Monsanto Company for $1.1 billion, and its other specialty chemicals unit, Calgon Vestal Laboratories, went to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company for $261 million. These sales also helped Merck pay down the debt it incurred in acquiring Medco, a unit that Gilmartin retained.

There were also two significant divestments in the late 1990s. In July 1997 Merck exited from the agribusiness sector when it sold its crop protection unit to Novartis for $910 million. In July 1998 Merck sold its half-interest in its joint venture with E.I. du Pont to its partner for $2.6 billion. Merck also restructured its animal health unit by combining it with that of Rhone-Poulenc S.A. to form Merial, a stand-alone joint venture created in August 1997. At the end of the 1990s Merial stood as the world's largest firm focusing on the discovery, manufacture, and marketing of veterinary pharmaceuticals and vaccines. By that time, Merck's partner in Merial was Aventis S.A., which had been formed from the late 1999 merger of Rhone-Poulenc and Hoechst A.G.

Another joint venture--the one formed with Astra in 1982--was restructured in the late 1990s. This venture's biggest success came with the December 1996 approval of Prilosec for the treatment of ulcers and heartburn. Prilosec went on to become a blockbuster. In July 1998 Merck and Astra agreed to transform the joint venture into a new limited partnership in which Merck would have no management control but would hold a limited partnership interest and receive royalty payments. This gave Astra more flexibility in terms of seeking a merger partner, and in April 1999 the company merged with Zeneca Group Plc to form AstraZeneca AB. Stemming from this merger and the 1998 agreement between Merck and Astra, Merck received from Astra two one-time payments totaling $1.8 billion.

From 1995 through 1999, Merck introduced a total of 15 new drugs. Gilmartin helped bring these new products to market, but credit for developing them fell to Dr. Edward M. Scolnick, the research chief under Vagelos who stayed with the firm even though he had vied to succeed Vagelos. Within 18 months of Gilmartin's arrival, Merck had launched a record eight drugs, including Crixivan, a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV; Fosamax, used to treat osteoporosis; and hypertension medication Cozaar. The eight drugs accounted for more than $1 billion in sales in 1996, about ten percent of the company's total drug sales. Through its joint venture with Johnson & Johnson, Merck also received U.S. approval in April 1995 for the antacid Pepcid AC, an OTC version of Merck's Pepcid.

As the 1990s continued, Merck faced the specter of the expiration of patent protection for some of its biggest-selling products--Vasotec and Pepcid were slated to expire in 2000, Mevacor and Prilosec in 2001. These five drugs generated $5.2 billion in U.S. sales in 1997. Under intense pressure to replace this--at least potentially--lost revenue, Merck continued its torrid pace of product debuts. In 1998 the company introduced a record five drugs: Singulair for asthma, Maxalt for migraine headaches, Aggrastat for acute coronary syndrome, Propecia for hair loss, and Cosopt for glaucoma. Merck managed only one drug introduction in 1999, but it was a blockbuster. Making its U.S. debut in May 1999, Vioxx was part of a new category of pain drugs, dubbed Cox-2 inhibitors. Cox-2, an enzyme present in various diseases, was blocked by the new drugs. As a treatment for arthritis, Vioxx was noteworthy for being effective while not irritating the stomach. Despite being second to market behind G.D. Searle & Co.'s Celebrex, Vioxx had a remarkable first seven months in which U.S. physicians wrote more than five million prescriptions. The new medication was expected to have sales in 2000 of more than $1 billion, a rapid rise to that level.

Merck headed into the uncertainty of the early 21st century riding a triumphant 1999 wave. In addition to its successful introduction of Vioxx, the company was heartened by the continued strength of its top-selling drug, Zocor, which was gaining market share despite intense competition, particularly from Warner-Lambert Company's Lipitor. Zocor was likely to have worldwide sales of more than $5 billion in 2000. Overall sales in 1999 increased 22 percent, reaching $32.71 billion, while net income increased 12 percent to $5.89 billion. Merck's worldwide pharmaceutical sales totaled $12.55 billion in 1999, placing the company in the number one position. This ranking was unlikely to last, however, thanks to two proposed mergers expected to close in 2000: the U.K. marriage of Glaxo Wellcome plc and SmithKline Beecham plc, and the U.S. coupling of Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert. Merck's Gilmartin stated that he had no interest in such a merger, despite the looming patent expirations. One apparent reason for Gilmartin's go-it-alone approach was the company's rapidly growing Merck-Medco unit, which achieved 1999 sales of $15.23 billion. The unit had established the world's biggest Internet-based pharmacy, merckmedco.com, and formed an alliance with CVS Corporation in 1999 to sell OTC medicines and general health products through this site. Merck-Medco also was helping enhance the sales of Merck drugs, although the FDA launched an investigation in the late 1990s into the practices of pharmacy-benefit management (PBM) firms, including whether any illegalities were taking place in regard to the PBMs steering patients to drugs made by a particular firm. Another reason for optimism about the future of Merck was its continued R & D commitment, represented in 2000 by a $2.4 billion budget. The company's pipeline included a potential blockbuster drug for the treatment of depression and anxiety, which could reach the market by 2001, in addition to several others in various stages of testing.

Principal Subsidiaries: Chibret A/S (Denmark); Hangzhou MSD Pharmaceutical Company Limited (China); International Indemnity Ltd. (Bermuda); Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Company; Laboratorios Prosalud S.A. (Peru); MCM Vaccine Co.; Merck and Company, Incorporated; Merck Capital Investments, Inc.; Merck Capital Resources, Inc.; Merck Enterprises Canada, Ltd.; Merck Foreign Sales Corporation Ltd. (Bermuda); Merck Hamilton, Inc.; Merck Holdings, Inc.; Merck Investment Co., Inc.; Merck Liability Management Company; Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C.; Merck Resource Management, Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme (Europe) Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Industria Quimica e Veterinaria Limitada (Brazil); Merck Sharp & Dohme (New Zealand) Limited; Merck Sharp & Dohme Overseas Finance N.V. (Netherland Antilles); Merck Sharp & Dohme (Panama) S.A.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Peru S.C.; Merck Sharp & Dohme (Philippines) Inc.; Merial Limited; MSD International Holdings, Inc.; MSD (Japan) Co., Ltd.; SIBIA Neurosciences, Inc.; The O'Hare Group, Inc.

Principal Competitors: Abbott Laboratories; American Home Products Corporation; Amgen Inc.; Baxter International Inc.; Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Eli Lilly and Company; Express Scripts, Inc.; Glaxo Wellcome plc; Monsanto Company; Novartis AG; Pfizer Inc.; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.; The Procter & Gamble Company; Roche Holding Ltd.; Schering-Plough Corporation; SmithKline Beecham plc; Warner-Lambert Company.

Further Reading:

Baldo, Anthony, 'Merck Plays Hardball,' Financial World, June 26, 1990, pp. 22+.
Barrett, Amy, 'Can Merck Grow Without a Megamerger?,' Business Week, June 22, 1998, p. 40.
Byrne, John A., 'The Miracle Company,' Business Week, October 19, 1987, pp. 84+.
Cloud, David S., 'Pharmacy-Benefit Management Firms Got Subpoenas in Drug-Marketing Probe,' Wall Street Journal, March 7, 2000, p. B7.
Eklund, Christopher S., and Judith H. Dobrynski, 'Merck: Pouring Money into Basic Research to Replace an Aging Product Line,' Business Week, November 26, 1984, pp. 114+.
Galambos, Louis, and Jane Eliot Sewell, Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp, & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Gannes, Stuart, 'Merck Has Made Biotech Work,' Fortune, January 19, 1987, p. 58.
Harris, Gardiner, 'Cold Turkey: How Merck Intends to Ride Out a Wave of Patent Expirations,' Wall Street Journal, February 9, 2000, pp. A1, A8.
Koberstein, Wayne, 'The Inner Merck: Chairman Ray Gilmartin Charts Pace-Setting Growth,' Pharmaceutical Executive, January 2000, pp. 44-48+.
Langreth, Robert, 'Merck Raises Its Estimate of Astra Sum,' Wall Street Journal, December 10, 1998, p. B7.
'Mercky Waters,' Economist, May 24, 1997, pp. 59-61.
Nossiter, Daniel D., 'Blue Chip Bet on Research: Merck to Launch Raft of New Products,' Barron's, November 8, 1982, pp. 16+.
O'Reilly, Brian, 'Why Merck Married the Enemy,' Fortune, September 20, 1993, pp. 60-64.
Reingold, Jennifer, 'Mercky Waters,' Financial World, January 17, 1995, pp. 28-29.
Robertson, Wyndham, 'Merck Strains to Keep the Pots Aboiling,' Fortune, March 1976, p. 134.
Rudnitsky, Howard, 'Anticipating Hillary,' Forbes, August 30, 1993, pp. 44-45.
Scheibla, Shirley Hobbs, 'Merck's Main Man: He Sees New Drugs Sparking Continued Growth,' Barron's, November 11, 1985, pp. 13+.
Seiden, Carl, 'Why Merck Has to Run Just to Stay in Place,' Medical Marketing and Media, August 1998, pp. 38-40, 42, 44, 46.
Smith, Lee, 'Merck Has an Ache in Japan,' Fortune, March 18, 1985, pp. 42+.
Tanouye, Elyse, 'Drug Makers' PBM Strategy Produces Uneven Results,' Wall Street Journal, February 11, 1998, p. B4.
------, 'Gilmartin, Merck's New CEO, Expected to Try Approaches He Used at Becton,' Wall Street Journal, June 13, 1994, p. B6.
------, 'Merck's Competition in Key Markets Pressure Earnings,' Wall Street Journal, July 24, 1998, p. B4.
Tanouye, Elyse, and Stephen D. Moore, 'Novartis to Pay $910 Million for Merck Business,' Wall Street Journal, May 14, 1997, p. A3.
Warren, Susan, 'DuPont Is Paying Merck $2.6 Billion to Buy Out 50% Stake in Drug Venture,' Wall Street Journal, May 20, 1998, p. A4.
Weber, Joseph, 'Merck Is Showing Its Age,' Business Week, August 23, 1993, pp. 72-74.
------, 'Merck Needs More Gold from the White Coats,' Business Week, March 18, 1991, pp. 102+.
------, 'Merck Wants to Be Alone--But with Lots of Friends,' Business Week, October 23, 1989, p. 62.
------, 'Mr. Nice Guy with a Mission,' Business Week, November 25, 1996, pp. 132+.
------, 'Suddenly, No Heir Is Apparent at Merck,' Business Week, July 26, 1993, p. 29.
Weber, Joseph, et al., 'Merck Finally Gets Its Man,' Business Week, June 27, 1994, p. 22.
'What the Doctor Ordered,' Time, August 18, 1952.
Willatt, Norris, 'Merck's Unlimited Medicine,' Management Today, May 1981, pp. 82+.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 34. St. James Press, 2000
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:43:16 | 显示全部楼层
默克创办史
http://www.merck.com/about/our-history/
在过去,我们已经做了伟大的事情。今天,我们为未来做伟大的事情。

默克公司具有悠久而丰富的历史,努力提高人民的健康和福祉。通过这些年来,我们的研究人员已经帮助找到新的方法来治疗和预防疾病 - 从发现的维生素B1,麻疹疫苗,感冒药和制酸剂,第一个他汀类药物治疗高胆固醇。我们的科学家也帮助开发了许多产品,以改善动物健康,包括疫苗和抗生素。

虽然我们很自豪我们的过去,我们关于这家新公司未来的热情,我们很高兴能够帮助世界各地的人们创造一个健康,光明的未来。

公司观点:

默克公司的使命是为社会提供优质的产品和服务 - 创新和解决方案,提高生活质量和满足客户的需求 - ?为员工提供有意义的工作和晋升机会和投资者提供一个优越的回报率。关键日期:

关键日期:

1668:弗里德里希·雅各默克在德国达姆施塔特,购买一个药剂师。 1827:海因里希灵光默克药物生产厂家到药店转换。 1887:E.默克公司,德国公司,在美国设立销售办事处设置。 1891年:乔治·默克,海因里希·默克的孙子,加入美国的分支,称为默克公司。 1899年:“默克诊疗手册诊断和治疗是首次发表。 1903年:美国拉威,新泽西州在网站中开始生产。 1917年:美国的入口到第一次世界大战我撞断默克制药公司和E.默克公司之间的关系。 1925年:乔治·W·默克接任总统,接替他的父亲。 1927年:公司权力特曼罗森葛登合并和默克公司,公司注册成立

20世纪40年代:默克公司的实验室进行了一系列的发现:维生素B12,可的松,链霉素。 1953年:公司与默沙东公司的合并。 1965:W. Gadsen亨利被任命为CEO,并启动一个不明智的产品多样化的计划。 1976年:约翰J. Honran的成功Gadsen,并再次强调药物研究。 1979年公司开始营销依那普利,其年销售额最终达到5.5亿美元,高血压抑制剂。 1982年,默克公司进入一个销售该公司的产品在美国与阿斯特拉AB合作。 1985年:博士P.罗伊瓦格洛斯接任CEO; Vasotec,用于治疗充血性心脏衰竭,被引入。 1988:Vasotec的成为默克的第一个十亿美元的一年的药物。 1989:过的非处方药合资创建了强生公司。 1992年:舒降胆固醇的战斗机,被引入,并最终成为一个重磅炸弹。 1993年:Medco的遏制服务公司“,”药品经营企业,为$ 660亿美元收购。 1994年:雷蒙V.吉尔马丁被任命为董事长兼首席执行官,成为第一个局外人,因此而得名。 1995年:公司剥离其特种化学品业务。 1999年:阿斯特拉默克公司支付$ 1.8十亿源自公司之间的一家合资企业,从阿斯特拉与捷利康公司合并;关节炎药物Vioxx的做它的首演。

公司发展历程:

默克公司,是世界最大的制药公司之一。其中该公司最重要的处方药物是用于治疗关节炎的止痛药万络,舒降之,美降脂,用于修改胆固醇水平;科素亚,Prinivil,和Vasotec,高血压药物;福善美,为的治疗和预防骨质疏松症;甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药,一个溃疡用药; Primaxin Noroxin,抗生素,蛋白酶抑制剂,用于治疗HIV CRIXIVAN;尔宁,哮喘的治疗; Cosopt,Timoptic,Trusopt,用于治疗青光眼,保法止,脱发的补救措施,以及几种疫苗,包括MMR II,水痘的疫苗VARIVAX,和乙肝疫苗Recombivax HB。默克公司还开发,生产,营销眼部医药品通过多家合资企业,其中包括:与强生(Johnson&Johnson),专注于设计和商业化过度的非处方版本的处方药物,如甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药AC合伙创业与安万特公司专注于欧洲的疫苗市场和安万特公司,这其中专注于动物保健和家禽遗传​​学的另一个合作伙伴关系。近半公司的收入产生,由Merck-Medco的托管护理,药房福利管理子公司,主要从事销售处方药管理的处方药计划。默克花费超过2亿,每年药品的研究和开发。大约40%的公司的人类健康产品的销售产生美国以外的国家。

德国起源

默克的开端可以追溯到弗里德里希·雅各布默克公司1668购买一个药剂师在德国达姆施塔特,被称为“在天使的标志。”毗邻的护城河,这家店仍然在默克家族几代人。

药房转化由海因里希灵光默克的药物生产厂家在1827年。他的第一个产品是吗啡,可待因,可卡因。他于1855年去世的时候,由他的公司,被称为E.默克公司的产品在全世界使用。 E.默克公司在1887年向美国派出一名代表,西奥多魏克尔,设立了销售办事处。魏克尔(谁还会去到自己的药物巨头施贵宝)加入由乔治·默克,海因里希·伊曼纽尔默克在1891年,24岁的孙子。 1899年,年轻的默克和魏克尔的收购拉威,新泽西州,占地150英亩的厂区,并于1903年开始生产。魏克尔次年离开公司。

在这个网站上的药物和化学品的制造始于1903年。此相同的位置安置企业默克公司总部和它的四个部门,以及研究实验室和化学品生产设施,到20世纪90年代。一旦被称为“默克·伍兹,”原植物周围的土地被用来猎取野味和畜栏国内动物。事实上,乔治·默克保持15至20只羊的羊群的动物消毒剂的有效性进行测试的理由。羊成为拉威景观的永久组成部分。

1899年也标志着默克手册“出版的诊断和治疗的第一年。本手册在1983年,进入了它的第14版。纽约时代周刊的评分,它在世界上使用最广泛的医疗文本。

1917年,当美国进入第一次世界大战中,乔治·默克的入口担心反德情绪,上缴相当一部分外国人财产托管人的美国默克股票。这部分代表E.默克公司持有的公司权益,从而结束默克&Co。的德国母公司的连接。在战争结束后,默克公司奖励他的爱国领导,外国人财产托管默克公司出售股份,价值约300万美元,向社会公开。乔治·默克保留该公司的控制权,1919年公司再次被完全公有制。

20世纪20年代至20世纪50年代:通过并购和研发增长

年到1926年,乔治·默克去世后,他的儿子乔治·默克一直担任总裁一年多的时间。年轻默克的任期的第一件大事 - 将持续25年 - 1927年合并,总部位于费城的权力特曼罗森葛登,制药公司最出名的抗疟药奎宁。合并后,默克公司注册成立自己的公司,默克公司,公司的合并使默克公司,以增加其销售额从1925年的600万美元的1929年超过1300万美元。用所得的资本扩张,默克公司默克传统的开创性研究和发展的启动和指导。 1933年,他建立了大型实验室,并聘请著名化学家和生物学家产生新的医药产品。他们的努力有深远的影响。研究治疗恶性贫血的途中,默克公司的科学家发现维生素B12。它的销售,无论是作为治疗药物和饲料的组成部分,是巨大的。

20世纪40年代持续十年的发现在药物研究中,尤其是在类固醇化学领域。在20世纪40年代初,默克公司的化学家合成可的松从牛胆,从而导致发现可的松的抗炎特性。在1943年,一个革命性的用于肺结核及其他感染的抗生素,链霉素,分离由默克公司的科学家。

尽管乔治·W·默克的领导下所做的开拓和研究成功,该公司在战后的几年奋斗。有没有前途的新药可言,并有来自外国公司的激烈竞争,抛售默克产品,以及前国内消费者开始制造自己的药物。默克公司发现自己在一个岌岌可危的财务状况。

一个解决方案是在1953年发现,当默克公司合并,并入,默沙东医药公司具有类似的历史和声誉。夏普和Dohme开始作为一个药剂师店于1845年在美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市。它的成功,在如此重要的产品,如磺胺类药物,疫苗和血浆产品的研究和开发匹配默克的成功。然而,兼并,以上两个行业领导者的结合。默克一个新的分销网络和市场设施,以确保主要客户。第一次,默克公司可以以自己的名义推广及销售药物。

在乔治·W·默克公司于1957年去世的时候,公司的销售已经超过了每年1亿美元。虽然阿尔伯特·默克的直系后裔弗里德里希·雅各布默克,继续坐在董事会上,进入20世纪80年代,行政长官从来没有再次举行由默克家族成员。

20世纪60年代到80年代中期:多元化,再次强调研究,幸存的各种困难

首席执行官亨利·Gadsen成为在1965年,当时的时髦,发起了一个多元化的方案。在20世纪60年代末和70年代初收购的业务为Calgon公司,水处理化学品和服务的供应商; Kelco公司,特种化学品制造商和巴尔的摩威斯达,制冷和工业制冷设备制造商。许多这些企业很快就被剥离后,发现利润是很难得的,到20世纪90年代初,但,卡尔冈和Kelco公司仍然默克的一部分。根据了Gadsen强调多元化,默克制药业务受到影响。

在1976年,约翰·J. Honran接替在位11年的Gadsen。 Honran是一个安静的,不事张扬的人,曾进入默克作为法律顾问,并成为企业公关总监。但Honran的不显眼的方式掩盖了积极的管理风格。随着务实的决心Honran不只有继续默克公司在药物研究中的创新传统,但也提高了新产品推出市场上表现欠佳。

这个问题是最明显的在营销的Aldomet,抗高血压药。一旦研究完成后,默克公司计划利用这一发现,通过引入改进的β-受体阻滞剂称为Blocadren的。然而,默克公司被殴打的市场,其竞争对手。此外,由于17年的专利保护对新药发现即将到期,Aldomet仿制药生产商的威胁。这种故障击败其竞争对手的市场说已经花费了公司未来销售200亿美元。发生类似的事件序列与消炎痛和Clinoril的,两个关节炎消炎药。

根据Honran的政权,公司引进肝炎疫苗,为青光眼称为Timoptic的治疗,动物,抗寄生虫药Ivomac。此外,虽然仍然坚定地致力于Honran融资高度生产力的研究机构,默克竞争对手进行的研究已经开始改善。例如,1979年,默克公司开始向市场依那普利,高血压抑制剂,类似的药物博通,Squibb公司制造。依那普利的销售达到了550万美元于1986年。 Honran也走上许可国外产品更积极的方案。默克公司在1982年购买的权利卖产品从瑞典阿斯特拉公司在美国AB,日本盐野义制药达成类似安排。两年后,默克雅特协议被改造成合资公司,阿斯特拉默克公司

Honran的策略被证明是非常有效的。该公司在1981年和1985年之间,经历了9%的年增长率,并于1985年华尔街成绩单,授予Honran的卓越金奖处方药的产业。他赞扬,为公司的先进的营销技术和增加生产。预测表明当时的奖励,双目前的速度,未来五年,公司增长率。

1984年,Honran声称,默克公司已成为最大的总部设在美国的三个最大市场 - 美国,日本和欧洲的药品制造商。他这种成功归结为三个因素:生产力的研究组织,允许符合成本效益,高品质的生产制造能力和优秀的营销组织。次年,Honran辞任行政总裁。 1986年,他的继任者,P.罗伊瓦格洛斯博士,生物化学家和公司的前负责人研究,也被授予道德制药业的金奖。

虽然默克公司的公众形象被普遍看好,它有它的份额争议。在1974年,3500万美元的诉讼是针对默克公司和其他28个药品生产企业和经销商己烯雌酚(DES)。此药,处方给孕妇,直到20世纪60年代初,在20世纪40年代末和表面上防止流产。原来的16个原告声称,他们开发的阴道癌和其他相关的困难,因为他们的母亲采取了药物。此外,诉讼费用,DES来自芪,已知的致癌物质,而且没有合理的依据,存在声称药物是有效的预防流产。 (前一年的西装,联邦药物管理局FDA,禁止使用DES的荷尔蒙,生长牛兴奋剂,因为测试显示残留物质在一些动物的肝脏致癌。,然而,美国食品和药物管理局不进行公开听证,在这个问题上,因此,联邦法院推翻禁令。)

法院根据原告的指令,要求被告通知其他可能的受害者,并建立早期发现和治疗中心。 350多名原告随后寻求赔偿总额约350亿美元。

默克公司是不被围攻的DES诉讼。 1975年,该公司的名字被添加到越来越多的美国公司在国外非法支付。通过调查,美国证券交易委员会颁布的回报,在某些非洲和中东国家,以增加销售,来到默克公司高管的注意。虽然销售额达40400000美元在这些领域的国外市场,该年度报告共发现了14万美元贿赂。一旦美国证券交易委员会的报告透露,默克公司发起了内部调查,并立即采取措施,以防止未来的非法款项。

后来,默克公司发现了自己新的困难所困扰。在其试图赢得霸主地位,在日本,在世界上的第二大医药市场,默克公司购买东京伴宇药业公司的50%以上。下一个合资商业企业称为合作伙伴自1954年以来日本默克伴宇(NMB),公司采用日本细节的男人(或医药销售代表)促进默克产品。

NMB被证明是低效的,但是,默克买下了它的合作伙伴315500000美元 - 30倍以上伴宇的年度盈利。该项收购是在1982年,默克还是在使伴宇成符合其更积极的和富有想象力的管理风格,在20世纪90年代初的过程中。

在1985年的春天,当默克锁定不同意一份新合同的730名工会员工在拉威厂后劳动关系中存在的问题浮出了水面。三个工会的合同,涉及4000名员工,期满前三个月,双方达成了一项新的解决。当谈判陷入僵局,但是,该公司锁定员工回应。尚未解决的问题涉及工资和福利。

6月5日,所有4000名员工参加罢工涉及拉威厂房及六个全国各地的其他设施。在弗吉尼亚州的西点,操作时停止工会纠察队员阻止非罢工员工进入工厂。默克,然而,能赢得了法院下达的禁令,限制纠察。

这次罢工被证明是在默克公司的历史最长,但15周后,终于达成了协议。 A公司请求采用两层的工资制度,将永久降低新员工的工资被拒绝支付,是工会在第一年内增加工资和生活成本调整的需求。然而,默克公司的声誉作为一个特殊的,高报酬的工作环境保持完好,其后续合同协议友好。事实上,默克公司被评为100家最佳公司之一工作的母亲“,因为该排名的1986年成立以来,在美国”工作母亲“杂志评选的100家最佳公司之一的工作。

20世纪80年代末和90年代初:重磅炸弹药物,合资,Medco公司

在20世纪80年代后期,每年两位数的销售增长,一跃默克制药行业无可争议的领导地位。 CEO瓦格洛斯在20世纪60年代和70年代的研究方向奠定了基础,为默克公司的药物在20世纪80年代的“富矿”。 Vasotec,用于治疗充血性心脏衰竭,于1985年推出,成为默克公司由1988年的第一个十亿美元的一年的药物。美降脂,降胆固醇药物,于1987年推出,伊维菌素,世界上最畅销的动物保健产品,也推动了公司的令人印象深刻的增长。在20世纪80年代后期,默克投资数百数百万美元的研究和开发 - 整个行业的总量的百分之十。在过去的十年中,默克公司的销售额增加了一倍以上,其利润的三倍,该公司成为世界上排名第一的制药公司,以及“商业周刊”的10个最有价值的公司之一。

该公司还确认其遗产的社会责任。默克公司在20世纪80年代,其药物'[河blindness' - 在热带地区流行的一种寄生虫感染,影响18万人 - ... ailable不收费。 1987年,公司分享了其研究结果对治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)与竞争对手。这些努力反映了乔治·W·默克的说法:“医学是为病人。它的利润。的利润,如果我们记住的是,他们从来没有出现。我们更好的记住它,他们已经较大。“

增长确实缓慢,但是在20世纪90年代初,默克公司的药品管道干燥。虽然该公司保持了在同行业中最广泛的产品线,其稳定的新的药物,显眼的特点在过去十年的'大片',但有一个例外。默克公司在1992年推出的舒降之,对抗胆固醇的药物,最终超过1亿美元的年销售额,成为该公司最畅销的药物和在历史上最成功的药品之一。

与此同时,默克公司签订了一些合资企业,创造替代产品开发的途径。默克在1989年加入强生公司在创业发展的柜台交易(OTC),默克公司的处方药版本,最初是为美国市场,后来扩大到欧洲和加拿大。两年后,默克和E.I.杜邦公司成立一家合资公司,研究,制造和销售药品和显像剂产品。默克公司和诺Laboratories公司(后来的部分对Aventis SA)共同商定于1992年在美国开发联合疫苗。默克公司在1994年创建了一个企业与关连公司,巴斯德梅里埃诺(这也是后来安万特公司的一部分),在欧洲市场结合疫苗。

默克公司在1993年为$ 660亿美元收购Medco的遏制服务公司。 Medco的是先前由Martin Wygod在获得3600万美元的20世纪80年代初的药物邮购分销商。臭名昭著的投资银行家迈克尔·米尔肯的帮助下,Wygod建的Medco成大众药品流通体制改革与由1992年的2.5亿美元的收入和1.38亿美元利润。很快被收购公司更名为默克Medco的管理式医疗。

购买的智慧分析师辩论。一方面,它被视为默克在美国医疗保健行业占主导地位的削减成本的管理服务网络和健康维护组织更具竞争力。另一方面,一些观察家指出,默克公司的子公司必然会散布竞争对手的药物,它一直贴现的主要支持者,扬言要切成默克公司的研发资金。

收购Medco公司也复杂瓦格洛斯的继任计划。意外辞职瓦格洛斯的选择,理查德·马卡姆,在1993年年中,就在几个月前CEO的预期退休。一些观察家推测,的54岁Wygod,他削减成本的倾向和营销拿手好戏,是有可能的继任者,但他也于1994年3月辞职。最终,其他内部候选人被绕过,以及有利于该公司的第一个局外人在默克历史采取的最高职位,雷蒙V.吉尔马丁。于1994年6月任命为CEO和董事长在当年11月,吉尔马丁有助于扭转医疗设备制造商碧迪公司作为该公司的董事长兼首席执行官。

20世纪90年代中期及以后

虽然已建成瓦格洛斯默克行业超群的位置,他的退休时间,整个医药板块在动荡源于管理式医疗的成长。销售和盈利增长都在下降。行业压力导致大合并创建葛兰素威康公司和诺华公司,推翻其作为全球最大的制药公司默克公司并列第三位,德国的赫斯特马里昂罗素。默克公司还患上了艰难的18个月了,找到瓦格洛斯的继任者留下'草皮意识,叛逃缠身的“文化(”商业周刊“的约瑟夫·韦伯所描述的)瓦格洛斯。吉尔马丁的主要任务之一,那么,重组公司的管理团队。 1994年9月,他成立了一个12名成员组成的管理委员会,以帮助他的增长的公司和情节战略的运行。管理团队包括在欧洲和亚洲的销售人员,兽医部门和疫苗,默克Medco公司的总裁,高管的研究,​​制造,金融,法律领域的元首。这个委员会的建立有助于精简和扁平化默克公司的组织结构,促进更大程度的公司团队,并停止外流发生的继承瓦格洛斯期间的高层管理者。

管理委员会的第一行为之一的肯定,该公司主要是一家研究驱动型制药公司默克,创建一个使命陈述。吉尔马丁随后又推出了撤资计划,抛弃一些非核心单位,包括仿制药的操作和管理的精神健康护理单元。 1995年,默克公司出售其Kelco公司特种化学品部门孟山都公司为$ 1.1亿美元,,去其他特种化学品业务单元,卡尔冈维斯塔实验室,施贵宝公司为$ 2.61亿美元。这些销售也有助于默克偿还债务所产生的收购Medco公司,吉尔马丁保留一个单位。

还有两个重大撤资20世纪90年代中后期。 1997年7月,默克公司退出时,从农业综合部门向诺华出售其作物保护单元9.1亿美元。 1998年7月,默克公司出售其一半的利益在其合资公司与EI杜邦到其合作伙伴为$ 2.6亿美元。默克公司还重组其动物卫生单位,结合与罗纳普朗克SA的梅里亚,形成一个独立的合资企业,创建于1997年8月。在90年代末,梅里亚站在作为世界上最大的公司,致力于发现,制造和营销的兽医药品和疫苗。到那个时候,默克公司的合作伙伴在梅里亚是安万特公司,已形成了从1999年底罗纳普朗克和Hoechst AG合并

另一家合资企业 - Astra在1982年形成一个 - 在20世纪90年代末进行了重组。这家合资公司最大的成功是1996年12月批准了对Prilosec用于治疗溃疡和胃灼热。奥美拉唑去成为一个重磅炸弹。 1998年7月,默克和Astra同意改造的合资企业进入一个新的有限合伙企业,默克就没有管理控制,但将持有的有限合伙权益,并收取版权费用。这给了更多的灵活性方面寻求合并伙伴,阿斯特拉公司在1999年4月与捷利康集团公司合并形成阿斯利康AB。源于这次合并和1998年之间的协议,默克公司和阿斯特拉,默克公司收到从阿斯特拉两个一次性付款,总额达180亿美元。

从1995年到1999年,默克公司共推出了15个新的药物。 “吉尔马丁帮助将这些新产品推向市场,但是开发它们的信用下降,研究首席下瓦格洛斯谁呆在一起的坚定,尽管他已经争先恐后地成功瓦格洛斯的博士爱德华·Scolnick的。吉尔马丁的到来的18个月内,默克公司已经推出了创纪录的八种药物,,包括CRIXIVAN,用于治疗HIV蛋白酶抑制剂;福善美,用于治疗骨质疏松症和高血压的药物科素亚。八种药物占超过100亿美元的销售额,在1996年,该公司的药品销售总额的百分之十左右。通过其合资公司与强生(Johnson&Johnson),默克公司还获得了美国于1995年4月批准的交流抗酸剂甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药,默克公司的甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药OTC版本。

正如20世纪90年代持续,默克公司面临着其最畅销的产品 - Vasotec和甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药的专利保护期届满的幽灵将在2001年到期,在2000年,美降脂和奥美拉唑。这五种药物产生5.2亿美元在美国的销售额在1997年。激烈的压力下,以取代本 - 至少是潜在的 - 失去的收入,默克继续炎热产品推出的步伐。公司于1998年推出了创纪录的五种药物:顺尔宁哮喘,偏头痛Maxalt的,艾卡特急性冠脉综合征,脱发柔沛,Cosopt青光眼。默克管理只有一种药物1999年推出,但它是一个重磅炸弹。其在美国的首次亮相于1999年5月,万络是新一类的止痛药,被称为“COX-2抑制剂的一部分。的Cox-2,在各种疾病中存在的酶,被阻塞的新的药物。作为一种治疗关节炎的Vioxx的是,值得注意的是有效的,同时不刺激胃。尽管第二市场,仅次于塞尔GD&Co。的西乐葆,万络有一个显着的前七个月,美国医生写了超过五百万张处方。预计将有新的药物,在2000年销售超过100亿美元,迅速上升到这一水平。

默克公司为首骑胜利的1999年波21世纪初的不确定性。该公司在除了其Vioxx的成功引进,是其最畅销药,舒降之,这是赢得市场份额,尽管激烈的竞争,特别是来自华纳 - 兰伯特公司的立普妥的持续走强鼓舞。舒降之是有可能在2000年的全球销售额超过500亿元。在1999年的整体销售增长了22%,达到32.71十亿美元,而净收入增长12%至5.89十亿美元。默克公司的全球药品销售总额为1999年的12.55十亿美元,使该公司的头号位置。这个排名是不太可能到最后,然而,由于两个拟议合并预计将在2000年:英国葛兰素威康和史克必成PLC婚姻,与美国辉瑞公司和华纳 - 兰伯特公司的耦合。默克公司的吉尔马丁说,他有没有兴趣,这样的合并,尽管迫在眉睫的专利到期。吉尔马丁去单独的方法的一个明显的原因是公司快速增长的默克的Medco的单元,实​​现1999年的销售额为15.23十亿美元。该单位已建立了世界上最大的基于互联网的的药房,merckmedco.com,形成了一个联盟与CVS公司在1999年销售非处方药和一般健康产品,通过这个网站。默克Medco公司还帮助提高默克药物的销售,虽然FDA展开调查,在20世纪90年代后期到医药福利管理(PBM)公司,包括是否有违法的情况正在发生方面PBMs的转向患者的做法药物由某公司。默克公司的未来持乐观态度的另一个原因是其持续研发的承诺,在2000年表示,由$ 2.4亿美元的预算。该公司的管道,包括潜在的重磅炸弹药物,用于治疗抑郁症和焦虑,从而达到2001年的市场,除了几个人在不同阶段的测试。

主要附属公司:Chibret A / S(丹麦);杭州默沙东制药有限公司(中国)国际责任有限公司(百慕达);约翰逊&约翰逊 - 默克消费者制药公司; LABORATORIOS Prosalud SA(秘鲁); MCM疫苗有限公司,默克公司注册成立;资本投资默克公司默克资本资源公司,加拿大默克企业有限公司;默克对外销售有限责任公司(百慕达);公司默克汉密尔顿;默克集团,公司,默克投资有限责任公司;默克责任管理公司,默克Medco公司托管护理,有限责任公司,默克资源管理,公司默沙东(欧洲)有限公司,默沙东INDUSTRIA QUIMICAéVETERINARIA LIMITADA(巴西);默克默沙东(新西兰)有限公司;默沙东海外金融NV(荷属安的列斯群岛),默沙东(巴拿马)SA默沙东秘鲁SC默沙东(菲律宾)公司,梅里亚有限公司; MSD国际控股公司MSD(日本)有限公司;神经科学公司SIBIA;奥黑尔集团,

主要竞争对手:雅培,美国家用产品公司,安进公司,Baxter国际公司,拜耳,勃林格殷格翰公司,施贵宝公司,礼来公司Express Scripts的公司,葛兰素威康公司,孟山都公司;
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:43:49 | 显示全部楼层

http://www.roche.com/about_roche/milestones.htm
罗氏创办史及发展史
Improving patients' lives for more than a century

Roche's Milestones

The founder of Roche, Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche, was a pioneering entrepreneur who was convinced that the future belonged to branded pharmaceutical products. He was among the first to recognise that the industrial manufacture of medicines would be a major advance in the fight against disease. Since then, Roche has grown into one of the world's leading healthcare companies. Navigate with the timeline through Roche's history.



1896

The founding year - first successes

F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. was founded at a time when industrial revolution was changing the face of Europe. On October 1, 1896, at the age of 28, Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche launched his company as the successor company to Hoffmann, Traub & Co in Basel, Switzerland. The guiding maxim for Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche was to develop and to manufacture novel drugs of uniform strength and quality and to distribute them internationally - a goal still valid today.

1897-1914
Expansion and internationalisation

Early on Roche starts to expand its business activities. From 1897 to 1910 the production facility in Grenzach, Germany, is greatly expanded and the lion's share of manufacturing is moved there. Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche and his new partner Carl Meerwein do not waste any time in building up a network of European and overseas agents and subsidiaries. Among others Roche opens offices (by 1914) in Milan (Italy), New York (USA), St. Petersburg (Russia), and London (Great Britain).

1928-1944

Vitamin boost overcomes the crisis

Roche managed to overcome the crisis under the leadership of chairman Emil C. Barell. The company experienced an unexpected upsurge spurred by its vitamin production, which made the return to former prosperity possible. Roche is able to expand once more and starts its strong commitment to the US-American market with first investments in New York and Nutley.

1965-1978

Diversification

Propelled by the success of the benzodiazepines, Roche is to branch out into markets spanning the whole spectrum of healthcare. In Switzerland and the United States bioelectronics departments are set up to develop electronicmedical instruments. Rocom and Medicovision are the company's forays into medical publishing. The acquisition of Dr. R. Maag AG, a plant protection company, reflects Roche's growing involvement in the agrochemical sector. The headquarters in Nutley, USA, set up a diagnostics department of its own. This period is also the starting point for Roche's involvement in basic biomedical research reflected by the decision to establish the Roche Institute of Molecular Biology in Nutley, USA, and the Basel Institute for Immunology as well as the Nippon

1979-1990

Reform, Concentration and Transparency

Roche begins to tighten organisational structures and moves towards creating separate business units, which should become more and more autonomous. In addition, corporate activities are consolidated through selective acquisitions and divestments in various business segments. After a general alignment of the company's structures Roche is left with four core business divisions: pharmaceuticals, vitamins and fine chemicals, diagnostics, and flavours and fragrances.

2000-2006

Company Restructure and Focus on Biotech

By sharpening the Group's focus on its core businesses - Pharmaceuticals and Diagnostics - the way of the future development is already paved. With combined expertise in Diagnostics and Pharmaceuticals and strength in biotechnology, Roche is ranked among the world’s leading innovation-driven healthcare companies and is ideally positioned to pursue Personalised Healthcare options.

2007-Today

Moving towards Personalised Healthcare

The increased focus on innovation and medical biotechnology has led to important advances in diagnostic techniques and innovative medicines aiming at molecular targets. As a result, many diseases can now be detected earlier and treated more specifically than ever before. The full integration with biotech pioneer Genentech in 2009 follows the acquisitions of other key players in areas spanning from life science research, gene sequencing and tissue diagnostics. They strengthen Roche’s access to innovation and new technologies to drive forward the commitment to more targeted treatments, and ultimately make personalised healthcare a reality.

Choose your era

Roche's History of Biotechnology

Company Perspectives:

We want to be innovative, and see change as an opportunity. Being active in high-technology fields, we must recognize new trends at a very early stage and be open to unconventional ideas. We see complacency as a threat. It is therefore our policy to encourage everywhere in the company the curiosity needed to be open to the world and to welcome change.

Key Dates:

1896:F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. is founded in Basel, Switzerland. 1919:The company goes public. 1920:Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche dies and Emil Barell assumes the role of president; and Elmer Bobst becomes head of the company's U.S. subsidiary. 1928:Nutley, New Jersey, becomes the site of the company's U.S. headquarters; and company interests are transferred to Sapac, a Canadian holding company. 1944:Elmer Bobst resigns. 1953:Emil Barell dies and Albert Caflisch replaces him. 1960:The company introduces Librium, a benzodiazepine tranquilizer that relieves tension without causing apathy. 1963:The company introduces Valium and it exceeds Librium in popularity. 1965:Caflisch dies and Adolf Jann assumes control of the company. 1978:Fritz Gerber becomes chairman of the board. 1986:The company releases Roferon-A, a treatment for rare forms of cancer. 1990:The company restructures into divisions; Roche purchases a majority shareholding in California's leading biotech company, Genentech, Inc. 1994:The company acquires Syntex Corporation, which becomes Roche Bioscience, a major R&D development site. 1995:Fritz Gerber becomes chief executive officer. 1998:Franz Humer becomes chief executive officer. 1999:Roche inaugurates a new R&D facility in Basel. 2000:Roche spins off its Fragrances and Flavors division as a new company, called Givaudan. 2001:Roche acquires Amira Medical, a corporation active in diabetes monitoring.

Company History:

Founded in 1896 in Basel, Switzerland, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. has grown from a small drug laboratory into one of the world's leading research-based healthcare companies active in more than 130 countries. Roche is involved in the discovery, development, and manufacture of pharmaceuticals and diagnostic systems, and is a producer of vitamins and carotenoids. It has research centers in Switzerland, Japan, the United States, and Germany.

The company's Pharmaceutical division engages in the research and development, manufacture and distribution of pharmaceuticals for the treatment of infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, bronchopulmonary diseases, metabolic disorders, and in the fields of virology, oncology, hematology, dermatology, and neurology.

The Diagnostics division engages in developing and marketing tools for research in genomics and proteomics, test methods for viruses such as HIV and HCV, integrated laboratory workstations, and devices for patients' own use. Its products are delivered through its affiliates all over the world.

Roche Vitamins and Fine Chemicals division is a bulk supplier of vitamins and carotenoids to the feed, food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Its products include medicinal feed additives, amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, feed enzymes, sunscreens, and emulsifiers.

The Early Years Under Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche

At the beginning of the 20th century, Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche's family had hoped that he would become a scientist, but when he showed no interest in a scientific career, his father, a wealthy Basel silk merchant, founded F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. for his son.

Hoffmann-La Roche was a talented entrepreneur who soon proved a success in his own right--and ahead of his time. He was committed to standardized packaging and to maintaining product quality and was convinced that the future belonged to branded pharmaceuticals. He recognized the importance of forming ties between the pharmaceutical industry and the community of academic scientists. Hoffmann-La Roche instituted the company's commitment to research, generously funding the company's facilities around the world to offer scientists a freedom in experimentation usually associated only with university laboratories.

Despite such well-intentioned policies, the young company experienced hardship in its early years; after only a few years in business, Hoffmann-La Roche faced bankruptcy. Disregarding his father's dying wish that he abandon the pharmaceutical business, Hoffmann-La Roche arranged for recapitalization (mainly from his own family). This time, the company enjoyed almost immediate success. Dr. Emil Barell, a young employee, developed several successful drugs: Thiocal, a cough medicine, and Digalen, an extract from the digitalis plant used in the treatment of heart disease. Other new products included Pantopon, a painkiller, and Sirolin, a cough syrup.

The revived company's future looked promising. By the eve of World War I, Hoffmann-La Roche's products sold on four continents. To standardize the marketing of products, the company adopted the name Roche (Hoffmann-La Roche's wife's maiden name) as its world trademark. Yet World War I created complications that threatened the success of its recent past.

The company's new factory in Germany, at Grenzach, produced a major share of Roche pharmaceuticals. But the Germans boycotted the company because they suspected it was supplying France; meanwhile, French doctors accused the company of being pro-German. In Britain, Roche products were blacklisted when the rumor spread that the company was producing poison gas for the German Army. Most devastating of all, the company lost more than 1 million francs in uncollected receivables in Russia during the Revolution.

This series of disasters forced the company to go public in 1919. Of the 4 million francs of paid-in capital used to reorganize the company, Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche supplied 3 million; the remainder came from his brother-in-law, two associates, and Dr. Barell. The following year, 1920, the company asked shareholders to double their subscriptions.

A Second Era of Growth and Expansion: 1920-1945

The year 1920 also marked the death of Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche. Barell assumed the role of president and ushered in a new era of growth and expansion. At the same time, an American, Elmer H. Bobst, became general manager of the company's U.S. subsidiary. The U.S. branch had been established in 1905, and Bobst's regime had been a resounding success: Under his leadership the company introduced Allonal, a pain reliever, which became the company's first million-dollar product.

Then a tragedy occurred in the Hoffmann-La Roche family that changed the course of company leadership: Emanuel, Fritz' eldest son, died in a car accident. In the late 1930s, Emanuel's widow married Paul Sacher, founder and conductor of the Basel Chamber Orchestra. Sacher assumed control of 49 percent of company shares--the interests of his wife, his stepson, Lukas Hoffmann, and his stepson-in-law, Jakob Oeri, a Basel surgeon. All three men filled seats on the board of directors. Sacher remained active in company decisions into the late 1980s.

In the years preceding World War II, the company's strategy shifted; it gradually moved from extracting medicines from natural sources to synthesizing them, and its most important breakthrough came in the large-scale production of synthetic bulk vitamins. Barell obtained a process for synthesizing vitamin C as early as 1933. Later successes included vitamins A and E. In 1971 the company enjoyed between 50 and 70 percent of the world market for vitamins, and production continued to grow.

As World War II approached, the company's American subsidiary assumed greater importance. In 1928, Nutley, New Jersey had become the site of the company's U.S. headquarters; when war and possible Nazi invasion of Switzerland threatened, the company prepared to expand the Nutley site. Company interests were also transferred to a Canadian holding company called Sapac. American operations in Nutley came under the administration of Sapac, whose vast production and research operations soon made it virtually an independent company.

Not only were assets transferred in the early 1940s, but Emil Barell himself moved to Nutley until the end of the war. Differences in their personalities and their approaches to business caused Bobst and Barell to disagree constantly, and, in 1944, Bobst resigned. He went on to assume control of the struggling Warner-Lambert Company and directed one of the most impressive comebacks in the pharmaceutical industry. Barell hired Lawrence Barney, recruited from the prestigious Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, to be president of the U.S. branch. Barney remained at Roche for the next 20 years. Emil Barell died in 1953 at the age of 79. His successor, Albert Caflisch, served until 1965.

Innovations in Research and Development: 1945-1965

The years between 1945 and 1965 were important to the company not only in terms of changes in executives, but also because of innovations in research and development. During this period, Roche released its line of phenomenally successful benzodiazepines, Valium and Librium, developed after years of research by scientist Leo Sternbach.

Librium was introduced in 1960. This new tranquilizer was revolutionary in its ability to relieve tension without simultaneously causing apathy. Before long, the company was barely able to keep up with demand; it now held the patent to the one of the best-selling prescription drugs in the world--the best-selling drug in the United States. In 1963, Roche introduced Valium to the market, and, by 1969, Valium exceeded Librium in popularity. Never before had a pharmaceutical company introduced two significant market successes in so short a time. By 1971, some 500 million patients had used one or the other of the drugs, generating an estimated US$2 billion in sales. With several years to go before patents expired, the two drugs continued to break sales records.

Difficulties in the 1970s

The company's success in developing benzodiazepine tranquilizers, however, was no protection from the vicissitudes of the daily operations of a large multinational company. Hoffmann-La Roche's pricing policy came under attack when the British Monopolies Commission discovered that Roche Products Ltd., the U.K. subsidiary of Hoffmann-La Roche, was paying the parent company the sums of US$925 a kilo for Librium and US$2,300 a kilo for Valium. In Italy, a country in which there are no drug patents, the costs per kilo were US$22.50 and US$50 respectively. Based on these findings, the Monopolies Commission ordered the company to reduce its prices 50 to 60 percent in the United Kingdom and to repay excess profit estimated at US$30 million.

In response, the company petitioned the House of Lords to overturn the government's order. Adolf Jann, head of Hoffmann-La Roche since Caflisch's death in 1965, vigorously defended the company's pricing policies. Formerly known for its unwillingness to disclose financial information, the company now put its financial cards on the table, running full-page newspaper advertisements defending its prices on the basis of its traditionally high costs for research and development. Information about company sales and profits were made public for the first time. In 1973, US$500 million of the US$1.2 billion volume at Roche was attributable to the sale of Valium and Librium.

Among consumers increasingly alarmed about the escalating costs of drugs, the company's arguments were generally ignored, and Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, Sweden, and South Africa began investigations of their own. By 1980, after years of litigation, Roche had emerged from the controversy virtually unscathed, having agreed to adhere thereafter to a system of voluntary price restraints.

The tumultuous price wars of the 1970s were not the only source of difficulties for the company. In 1976 a poison cloud of TCDD, a dioxin found in Agent Orange, escaped from Icmesa, an Italian chemical factory owned by Roche. TCDD is an unwanted byproduct of trichloropenol, a drug produced by Icmesa. Although the cause of the poison cloud remains speculative, experts believe that on the day of the accident the temperature in the reactor was accidentally allowed to rise to 300 degrees centigrade, 125 degrees greater than the safe temperature for production.

Nearly 80,000 domestic fowl and half the pigs in the area died as a result of the accident. Six days after the blast, the first case of chloracne, a human skin disease caused by TCDD, was reported. The company alerted the authorities by supplying a map of the area that they believed to be contaminated and advising that the area be evacuated. The Italian government, with the full assistance of the company, initiated investigative procedures and decided to evacuate 267 acres on which some 700 people lived. An additional 5,000 people, living in the periphery of the area, were instructed about preventive measures. Despite these precautions, there were finally 136 confirmed cases of chloracne. Roche paid more than US$17 million in 1978 to cover the costs of decontamination and the relocation and settlement of displaced people; in 1980, the company paid Italian authorities a further US$114 million in compensation.

The 1980s-1990s: Reorganization and Acquisition

In 1978 there was another change of the guard at Roche, with Fritz Gerber becoming head of the company. Gerber led Roche into a joint venture to market Zantac, an antiulcer drug with GlaxoSmithKline, the British pharmaceutical company, in the 1980s. Using 750 Roche salespeople, the two companies challenged GlaxoSmithKline's popular drug Tagamet, and their aggressive marketing strategies led Zantac to capture 25 percent of the market in little more than six months. Roche also moved to the forefront of genetic engineering, particularly in its production of interferons. Roferon-A, released on the market in June 1986, was marketed as a treatment for rare forms of cancer.

The late 1980s and early 1990s were also a time of reorganization at Roche. In the spring of 1986, the heads of all Roche companies met to discuss the company's structure and, as a result, individuals business units were strengthened and made increasingly autonomous. Accounting and reporting practices were standardized and modernization measures were implemented in all areas. In 1989, the company transformed its businesses into true divisions, which began to operate like independent companies. The spin off of Givaudan (formerly the Fragrances and Flavors division) in 2000 left Roche with three divisions: Pharmaceuticals, Diagnostics, and Vitamins and Fine Chemicals.

Roche also made some major acquisitions in the 1990s. In a move that attracted widespread attention, Roche purchased a majority shareholding in California's leading biotech company, Genentech, Inc. in 1990. Further strengthening its position in the worldwide healthcare market, in 1991, it purchased Nicholas, a European-based producer of nonprescription medicines. In 1994 it took over Syntex Corporation, which became Roche Bioscience, one of the company's major research and development sites, and led to staff cuts in research, production, and marketing totaling 5,000 jobs. The acquisitions in the late 1990s of Boehringer Mannheim and the Corange Group, strengthened the Diagnostics division and made Roche the world leader in the area of diagnostics products.

Roche continued to launch new products throughout the 1990s: Inhibace, an antihypertensive, in 1990; Mabthera, for cancer therapy; and Zenapex, to prevent organ rejection after transplant, in 1997. Inhibace was the first Roche product designed with the aid of computer modeling techniques and won the 1999 Prix Galien, Roche's fourth such award. Other landmarks in the 1990s included the 1991 acquisition of worldwide marketing rights to the polymerase chain reaction from Cetus Corporation, which opened the way to developing better diagnostic tests, and the 1995 discovery of a new class of therapeutics, protease inhibitors, for treatment of AIDS.

In the mid- to late 1990s, the company again changed leadership. Franz Humer, who had been head of the Pharmaceuticals division since 1995, was elected chief executive officer in 1998, replacing Fritz Gerber, who remained president of the board. Humer also replaced Gerber as president in 2001. The era of Franz Humer promised to be as eventful as those of his predecessors. In 1999, Roche inaugurated its new R&D facility in Basel. It also acquired the rest of Genentech and, in 2001, acquired Amira Medical, a corporation active in the diabetes monitoring business. During the early years of the 21st century, the company formed an alliance with Chugai of Japan in 2001, establishing its footing in the world's second largest healthcare market. Other 2001 partnerships included those forged with the Mayo Clinic, Combinatrix Corporation, and Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States; deCODE genetics in Iceland; Prionics Inc. in Switzerland; and Innogenetics NV in Belgium. The decision to separate the company's vitamins business marked its commitment to concentrate on its core pharmaceuticals and diagnostics businesses.

Principal Subsidiaries:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Genentech, Inc.; Givaudan-Roure SA; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Roche AG; Roche Consumer Health (Worldwide) SA; Hoffmann Roche Diagnostics Corporation; Roche Molecular Biochemicals; Tegimenta AG; Teranol Ltd.

Principal Competitors:Abbott Laboratories; AstraZeneca PLC; Aventis; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; GlaxoSmithKline PLC; Merck and Company, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.

Further Reading:

"1896-1996: Highlights in the History of an International Basel Company," Roche Magazine, January 1996.
"AIDS Treatement to Be Reduced in Price," Guardian, May 12, 2000, p. 1.
Banks, Howard, "How Roche Got an Edge on Its Competitors," Forbes, November 2, 1998, p. 100.
Bilefsky, Dan and Vanessa Fuhrmans, "DSM to Buy Roche Holding's Vitamins Business," Wall Street Journal, September 4, 2002, p. A.6.
Fikes, Bradley J., "The Biggest Biotech IPO in History," BioVenture View, September 1999, p. 14.
Hill, George, "Building a War Chest, " Med Ad News, December 1999, p. 34.
Landau, Peter, "Roche Holdings to Spin Off Givaudan-Roure F&F Entity," Chemical Market Reporter, December 13, 1999, p. 28.
Moore, Samuel K. "Vitamins Makers Settle U.S. Civil Suit for $1.17 Billion," Chemical Week, November 10, 1999, p. 15.
Moore, Stephen D., "Roche, Decode Claim They Located Gene Linked to Alzheimer Disease," Wall Street Journal, August 21, 2000 p. 4.
Reeve, Simon, "Unhealthy Roche Looks For a Cure," European, April 13, 1998, p. 24.
"Roche Buys Controlling Stake in Chugai," Economist, December 15, 2001, p. 7.
"Roche Creates Doubts About Future," Pharmaceutical Business News, June 6, 2001, p. 1.
"Roche Earnings Hit New Heights: Humer Defends Development Pipeline," Marketletter, August 21, 2000.
"Roche Maps Strategy While Awaiting Fate of Vitamins Biz," Chemical Market Reporter, March 11, 2002, p. 21.
"Roche Upbeat on Pipeline Despite Problems with Trocade and Bonviva," Marketletter, April 17, 2000.
"UK: First Effective Pill for Influenza," Daily Telegraph, May 26, 2000, p. 13.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 50. St. James Press, 2003.

We were one of the first pharmaceutical companies to embrace biotechnology, which led to our acquiring a majority stake in Genentech in 1990. Today our biotech products are helping to improve the lives of countless patients in a variety of disease areas, and we are the numberone maker of biologics. We also invested in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology when it was still in its infancy — a decision which has helped us to become the global market leader in molecular diagnostics.

Discovering, developing and commercialising new medicines takes time and vision. To stay at the leading edge of innovation, it is essential to invest early in promising new technologies.

One of the technologies we are investing in today is RNA interference (RNAi), which offers a way to target and ‘turn off’ specific genes. RNAi-based medicines could prove a groundbreaking new approach to fighting disease and helping patients.

Taking a long-term view
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:44:51 | 显示全部楼层
罗氏创办史及发展史
一个多世纪以来为改善患者的生活

罗氏的里程碑

创始人弗里茨·霍夫曼罗氏,罗氏,是一个创业的企业家,谁相信未来属于品牌医药产品。他是第一个认识到工业生产的药品将是一个重大的进步,在疾病的打击。从那时起,罗氏公司已经成长为全球领先的医疗保健公司之一。浏览与罗氏的历史时间轴通过。



1896

成立一年 - 第一场胜利

F.霍夫曼 - 罗氏公司始建于工业革命的时候,面对不断变化的欧洲。 1896年10月1日,28岁的弗里茨·霍夫曼罗氏公司推出了他的公司的继承人霍夫曼,特劳布公司在瑞士巴塞尔。指导格言为弗里茨霍夫曼罗氏是开发和制造新型药物均匀的强度和质量,并分发国际 - 这个目标今天仍然有效。

1897-1914
扩张和国际化

早罗氏开始扩大其业务活动。从1897年到1910年在,德国,格伦扎克的是极大地扩大生产设施和制造的大部分份额被搬到了那里。弗里茨·霍夫曼罗氏和他的新搭档卡尔·米尔文不浪费任何时间,在建立欧洲和海外代理网络及附属。其中包括罗氏开设办事处(1914年),米兰(意大利),纽约(美国),圣彼得堡(俄罗斯),伦敦(英国)。

1928年至19​​44年

维生素提振克服危机

罗氏公司管理的主席C. Barell周华健的领导下,克服危机。该公司经历了一个意想不到的高潮刺激下,其维生素生产,这使得恢复昔日的繁荣景象可能。罗氏是能够再次扩大,并开始在纽约和纳特利与第一投资美美国市场的坚定承诺。

1965-1978

多样化

成功的苯二氮卓类药物的推动下,罗氏是拓展到跨越整个频谱的医疗市场。在瑞士和美国生物电子部门的设立旨在发展electronicmedical工具。 ROCOM Medicovision医学出版公司的进军。博士,植保公司,河马格AG的收购反映了罗氏公司在农药行业越来越多地参与。纳特利,总部设在美国,设立自身的诊断部门。这个时期也是纳特利,美国罗氏公司分子生物学研究所和巴塞尔免疫研究所以及日本决定设立罗氏公司的参与反映在基础生物医学研究的起点

1979-1990

改革,浓度和透明度

罗氏公司开始收紧创建独立的业务单位,这应该成为越来越多的自主组织结构和走向。此外,企业经营活动综合各业务分部通过​​选择性收购及撤资。一般经过一个公司的结构对齐罗氏留下四个核心业务部门:药品,维生素和精细化工,诊断,和香精和香料。

2000-2006

公司重组,并专注于生物科技

锐化本集团专注于其核心业务 - 药品和诊断 - 未来发展的方式是已经铺好。罗氏在诊断和制药公司和生物技术实力与专业技术的结合,跻身世界领先的创新驱动的医疗保健公司,是理想的位置,以追求个性化的医疗保健选择。

2007年的今天

走向个性化的医疗保健

更加注重创新和生物医药已导致针对分子靶点的诊断技术和创新药物的重要进展。其结果是,现在可以被检测到许多疾病的更早,比以往任何时候更具体的治疗充分整合与生物技术的先驱Genentech公司在2009年收购在跨越从生命科学的研究,基因测序和组织诊断领域的其他关键球员。他们加强罗氏的访问,以推动创新和新技术的承诺,以更加有针对性的治疗,并最终使个性化医疗成为现实。

选择你的时代

罗氏生物技术的历史

公司观点:

我们要有所创新,并看到变化为契机。活跃​​在高科技领域,我们必须认识到在一个非常早期的阶段,新的发展趋势,是开放的,以超常规的想法。自满,因为我们看到了威胁。因此,它是无处不在的好奇心需要向世界开放,并欢迎改变公司的政策是鼓励。

关键日期:

1896年:F。在瑞士巴塞尔的罗氏公司成立。 1919年:公司上市。 1920年:弗里茨·霍夫曼罗氏模具和Emil Barell的的假设总裁一职;埃尔默博斯特成为该公司的美国子公司负责人。 1928年,新泽西州纳特利,成为该公司的美国总部的网站;,SAPAC,加拿大控股公司和公司利益转移。 1944:,埃尔默博斯特辞职。 1953:Emil Barell的模具和阿尔伯特·卡弗利施取代他。 1960年:公司介绍利眠宁,苯二氮卓类镇静剂,缓解紧张局势,而不会造成冷漠。 1963年:公司介绍安定和它超过利眠宁普及。 1965年:模具和阿道夫·卡弗利施JANN假设公司的控制权。 1978年:弗里茨·格柏成为董事会主席。 1986年:公司发布ROFERON-A,用于治疗罕见形式的癌症。 1990年:公司转型到部门,罗氏在加利福尼亚州的领先的生物技术公司Genentech公司1994年购买的多数股权:本公司收购SYNTEX公司,成为罗氏生物科学,R&D发展的主要网站。 1995年:弗里茨·格柏成为首席执行官。 1998年:弗朗茨·胡默成为首席执行官。 1999年罗氏公司开创了一种新的R&D机构在巴塞尔。 2000:罗氏分拆其香料和香精师作为一个新的公司,称为奇华顿。 2001年:罗氏收购阿米拉医疗,该公司活跃在糖尿病监测。

公司发展历程:

在瑞士巴塞尔,成立于1896年,F.霍夫曼罗氏有限公司已经成长为一个世界领先的以研究为基础的医疗保健公司,活跃在130多个国家有小毒实验室。罗氏公司参与药品和诊断系统的发现,开发和制造,是一家生产维生素和类胡萝卜素。它在瑞士,日本,美国和德国的研究中心。

该公司的制药部门从事研究和开发,制造和分销的药物治疗的传染性疾病,心血管疾病,炎症和自身免疫性疾病,支气管肺疾病,代谢性疾病,病毒学,肿瘤科,血液科,皮肤科领域中,和神经内科。

诊断部从事基因组学和蛋白质组学研究的病毒如艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒,综合实验室工作站,以及患者自用设备,测试方法的开发和营销的工具。其产品通过其在世界各地的分支机构交付。

罗氏维生素和精细化工部门是一个大的供应商,饲料,食品,医药,化妆品等行业的维生素和类胡萝卜素。其产品包括药用饲​​料添加剂,氨基酸,不饱和脂肪酸,饲料酶,防晒剂,和乳化剂。

根据弗里茨·霍夫曼罗氏早年

弗里茨·霍夫曼 - 罗氏家族在20世纪初,希望他能成为一名科学家,但在科学的职业生涯时,他没有表现出兴趣,他的父亲,一个富裕的巴塞尔丝绸商人,创立罗氏楼&有限公司为儿子。

罗氏公司是一个有才华的企业家,他很快被证明是成功的在自己的权利 - 他的时间提前。他致力于标准化包装和保持产品质量,并坚信,未来属于品牌药品。他承认制药行业和社会各界的学术科学家之间形成的关系的重要性。罗氏公司设立公司致力于研究,公司的慷慨资助世界各地的科学家提供自由在实验中通常只与大学实验室的设施。

尽管用心良苦政策,年轻的公司,在其早年历经后仅过了几年业务,罗氏面临破产。不顾父亲的遗愿,他放弃了医药商业,罗氏资本重组安排(主要是从他自己的家庭)。这一次,该公司享有几乎是立竿见影的成功。一个年轻的雇员,的埃米尔Barell博士,开发了几个成功的药物:Thiocal,咳嗽药,Digalen,洋地黄植物的提取物用于治疗心脏疾病。其他新产品包括Pantopon,止痛药,止咳糖浆Sirolin。

复兴公司的未来看起来前途无量。到第一次世界大战前夕,罗氏公司的产品远销四大洲。要规范市场的产品,该公司采用世界商标的名称罗氏(霍夫曼罗氏妻子的娘家姓)。然而,第一次世界大战我创建的并发症,威胁其最近的成功。

该公司的新工厂,在德国,在格伦扎克,罗氏制药生产的主要份额。但德国人,因为他们怀疑这是供应法国抵制该公司,同时,法国医生亲德指责该公司。在英国,罗氏产品被列入黑名单,该公司为德国军队生产毒气谣言的传播。最具破坏性的是,该公司在未收回的应收账款在俄罗斯失去了超过100万法郎革命期间。

这一连串的灾难,迫使该公司于1919年公开。弗里茨·霍夫曼 - 罗氏400万法郎实收资本额用于重组该公司,提供3万元,其余的来自他的弟弟法,两间联营公司,和Barell博士。次年,1920年,公司要求股东加倍他们的订阅。

再增长和扩张的时代:1920年至1945年

1920年也标志着弗里​​茨·霍夫曼 - 罗氏死亡。 Barell担任总裁一职,并迎来了一个新时代的增长和扩张。与此同时,美国,埃尔默·博斯特,成为该公司的美国子公司的总经理。美国分公司已成立于1905年,博斯特政权已经取得了巨大的成功:在他的领导下公司引进Allonal的,一种止痛药,成为公司的第一个百万美元的产品。

然后悲剧发生在罗氏家族,改变的过程中,公司领导:伊曼纽尔,弗里茨的长子,在一场车祸中去世。在20世纪30年代后期,伊曼纽尔的寡妇结婚,创始人保罗·萨赫巴塞尔室内乐团及指挥。 Sacher酒店承担49%的公司股份的控制 - 他的妻子,他的继子,卢卡斯·霍夫曼的利益,和他的继子在法律,雅各布Oeri,巴塞尔医生。所有这三个男人填补董事会的席位。萨赫仍然积极参与公司决策,到20世纪80年代末。

在二战前几年,该公司的战略转移,它逐渐从天然来源中提取的药物合成,其最重要的突破是在大规模生产合成大量维生素。早在1933年,用于合成维生素C,barell取得过程。后来的成就包括:维生素A和E在1971年公司享受50%和70%的世界市场之间的维生素,产量持续增长。

随着第二次世界大战的临近,该公司的美国子公司承担更大的重要性。 1928年,新泽西州纳特利,已经成为该公司的美国总部网站;战争和可能的纳粹入侵瑞士威胁时,该公司准备扩大纳特利网站。公司利益也被转移到加拿大控股公司称为SAPAC。纳特利美国业务受到SAPAC的管理,其庞大的生产和研究业务很快几乎一个独立的公司。

不仅是在20世纪40年代初转让资产,但周华健Barell自己搬到纳特利,直到战争结束。他们的个性和他们的方法的差异造成博斯特和Barell的业务不断,不同意,并于1944年,博斯特辞职。他去承担的挣扎华纳 - 兰伯特公司的控制权,并指示在制药行业的最令人印象深刻的复出之一。 Barell聘请劳伦斯·巴尼,聘请著名的威斯康星校友研究基金会,美国分公司总裁。巴尼在未来20年保持在罗氏。 Emil Barell的在1953年去世,享年79岁。他的继任者,CAFLISCH阿尔伯特担任,直到1965年。

在研究和开发中的创新:1945-1965

在1945年和1965年之间的年公司不仅在高管变动方面是很重要的,但也因为在研究和开发创新。在此期间,罗氏公司发布了其线由科学家利奥施特恩巴赫的,经过多年的研究开发取得了巨大的成功,苯二氮卓类药物,安定,利眠宁。

利眠宁在1960年推出。这种新的镇定剂是革命性的,它能够舒缓紧张的不同时造成冷漠。没过多久,公司勉强能够跟上需求的增长,它现在持有的此专利在美国最畅销的药物之一,在世界上最畅销的处方药 - 。 1963年,罗氏推出安定市场,到1969年,安定超出利眠宁普及。以前从来没有一家制药公司推出了两个显着的市场成功,在这么短的时间。到1971年,约有500万患者曾使用一个或其他的药物,估计产生2美元亿美元的销售额。两种药物专利过期前几年去,继续打破销售记录。

在20世纪70年代的困难

然而,该公司的成功发展中苯二氮卓类镇静剂是一家大型跨国企业公司的日常运作的沧桑没有保障。霍夫曼罗氏公司的定价政策来受到攻击时,英国垄断委员会发现罗氏产品有限公司,英国罗氏公司的子公司,支付母公司的925美元一公斤的款项利眠宁和美元2,300公斤为安定。在意大利,一个国家有没有药物专利,成本每公斤分别为22.50美元和50美元。基于这些发现,垄断委员会责令公司降低其价格50%至60%在英国及偿还多余的利润估计在3000万美元。

对此,公司诉请上议院推翻政府的命令。 JANN阿道夫·卡弗利施先生于1965年去世以来,罗氏头,大力捍卫公司的定价政策。原名不愿披露财务信息,公司现在把金融卡放在桌子上,捍卫其价格的基础上的研究和开发的其传统成本高,运行整版的报纸广告。第一次对公司销售收入和利润的信息被公之于众。 1973年,美元500万元,美元1.2亿元,成交量为罗氏是由于安定和利眠宁出售。

在越来越多的消费者感到震惊的药物的成本不断攀升,公司的论点被普遍忽视,德国,荷兰,澳大利亚,瑞典,南非开始了自己的调查。到1980年,经过多年的诉讼,罗氏已经出现的争议几乎毫发未损,已同意以后要坚持自愿的价格限制到一个系统。

20世纪70年代的混乱价格战不是唯一的来源为公司的困难。在1976年的毒云,橙剂中的戴奥辛TCDD,躲过从Icmesa,由罗氏公司拥有意大利化工厂。二恶英的trichloropenol不需要的副产品,一种药物由Icmesa生产。虽然仍然是投机性的毒云的原因,专家认为,在事故发生当天不小心被允许在反应器中的温度上升至摄氏300度,125度大于生产安全温度。

近80000个家禽和在该地区的一半的猪死亡的意外的结果。爆炸发生后6天,第一种情况下,人体皮肤疾病引起的TCDD,氯痤疮进行了报道。该公司惊动当局提供一个区域的地图,他们认为受到污染,建议该地区撤离。意大利政府的全力协助下,该公司启动了调查程序和决定撤离267亩,其中约有700人居住。一个额外的5000人,居住在周边的区域,关于预防措施的指示。尽管有这些防范措施,有终于氯痤疮136例确诊病例。罗氏公司支付了超过1700万美元,在1978年的去污和拆迁安置流离失所者支付的费用,在1980年,公司支付了意大利当局进一步1.14亿美元的赔偿金。

20世纪80年代 - 20世纪90年代:重组和收购

1978年是另一个变化的后卫在罗氏,弗里茨·格柏成为公司的负责人。格柏带领罗氏进入一家合资企业,市场扎特克,英国制药公司葛兰素史克,抗溃疡药物,在20世纪80年代。使用750罗氏公司的销售员,这两家公司葛兰素史克公司的挑战流行的药物泰胃美,进取的市场策略导致扎特克捕捉到25%的市场份额,在小半年以上。罗氏公司也搬到了基因工程的前沿,特别是在其生产的干扰素。 ROFERON-A,1986年6月,在市场上发布销售作为一种治疗罕见形式的癌症。

20世纪80年代末和90年代初分别在罗氏公司的重组时间。在1986年的春天,所有罗氏公司的负责人开会讨论公司的结构,因此,个人业务单位加强和日益自主的。会计和报告的做法是标准化和现代化建设的措施,在所有领域实施。 1989年,公司将其变成真正的部门,像独立公司开始运营业务。分拆奇华顿(原香料和香精部门)在2000年离开罗氏三个部门:制药,诊断,维生素和精细化工。

罗氏公司还取得了一些重大的收购在20世纪90年代。这一举动引起了广泛关注,罗氏公司在加利福尼亚州的领先的生物技术公司Genentech公司在1990年购买的多数股权。进一步加强其在全球医疗保健市场的地位,1991年,它购买了尼古拉斯,一个基于欧洲的非处方药生产商。在1994年接手SYNTEX公司,罗氏生物科技,成为公司的主要研究和开发网站之一,导致裁员的研究,生产,营销共5000个职位。收购的勃林格曼海姆Corange的集团在20世纪90年代后期,加强诊断部和罗氏诊断产品领域的世界领先地位。

罗氏继续推出在整个20世纪90年代的新产品:Inhibace,降压,在1990年,美罗华,为癌症治疗和Zenapex,防止器官移植后的排斥反应,在1997年。 Inhibace是第一罗氏借助计算机建模技术设计的产品,并赢得了1999年大奖赛GALIEN,罗氏公司的第四等奖项。在20世纪90年代的其他地标包括1991年收购的全球市场营销权,以聚合酶链反应从鲸鱼座公司,开辟了道路,以开发更好的诊断测试,1995年发现了一类新的疗法,蛋白酶抑制剂,用于治疗艾滋病。

在中期到20世纪90年代后期,该公司再次换了领导。弗朗茨·胡默,谁曾药品部的负责人,自1995年以来,在1998年当选为行政总裁,取代弗里茨·格柏,谁留的董事会主席。胡沫也取代格柏在2001年的总统。弗朗茨·胡默时代的承诺是他的前任们多事。在1999年,罗氏在巴塞尔成立了新的研发设施。它还收购了其余的Genentech公司,在2001年,活跃在糖尿病监测业务的公司,收购阿米拉医疗。在21世纪的最初几年,该公司成立了一个联盟与日本中外制药株式会社于2001年,建立世界第二大医疗保健市场站稳脚跟。其他2001年的伙伴关系,包括那些伪造梅奥诊所,公司Combinatrix,和千年制药公司在美国;在冰岛的deCODE遗传学公司在瑞士Prionics公司和Innogenetics公司NV在比利时。公司的维生素业务分开的决定标志着其承诺,集中精力在其核心药品和诊断业务。

主要附属公司:F。霍夫曼罗氏有限公司; Genentech公司; Givaudan公司 - ROURE SA;罗氏公司,罗氏公司,罗氏消费者健康(全球)SA;霍夫曼罗氏诊断公司罗氏分子生物化学; Tegimenta AG; Teranol有限公司

主要竞争对手:雅培,阿斯利康,安万特公司,百时美施贵宝公司,葛兰素史克,默克公司,公司,辉瑞公司

更多阅读:

“1896年至1996年:聚焦在巴塞尔国际公司历史,”罗氏杂志,1996年1月。
“艾滋病Treatement的降低价格,”卫报“5月12日,2000年,第。 1。
银行,霍华德,:“罗氏如何得到边缘上其竞争对手,”11月2日,1998年,“福布斯”。 100。
丹Bilefsky和Vanessa Fuhrmans的,“帝斯曼购买罗氏控股的维他命业务,”华尔街日报“9月4日,2002,页。 A.6。
Fikes,布拉德利J.,“IPO历史上最大的生物技术,生物风险企业查看,1999年9月。 14。
希尔,乔治,“建立一个战争公益金,”1999年12月,第医学广告新闻。 34。
朗道,彼得,“罗氏控股分拆奇华顿ROURE F&F实体,”化学品市场记者,12月13日,1999年,第。 28。
摩尔,塞缪尔K.“维生素庄家定居美国民事诉讼为11.7亿美元,”化学周刊“11月10日,1999年,页。 15。
摩尔,斯蒂芬D.“罗氏,解码声称他们位于基因与阿尔茨海默病,”华尔街日报“8月21日,2000市盈率。 4。
里夫,西蒙说:“罗氏看起来不健康的一种治疗方法,”欧洲4月13日,1998年,第24。
“罗氏公司收购控股权在中外,”经​​济学家“,12月15日,2001年,第。 7。
“罗氏创建​​未来的疑虑,”医药商业新闻6月6日,2001年,第1。
“罗氏公司盈利屡创新高:,胡默卫冕发展管道”,2000年8月21日Marketletter。
“罗氏在等待命运的维生素常用的地图战略,”化学品市场记者3月11日,2002年,页。 21。
“罗氏名Bonviva:”Marketletter,2000年4月17日Trocade和管道尽管问题的乐观。
“英国:第一个有效的流感丸,”每日电讯报“5月26日,2000年,页。 13。


资料来源:公司历史,国际指南。 50。圣雅各福群出版社,2003。

我们是第一的制药公司接受生物技术,这导致我​​们在1990年收购Genentech公司的多数股权。今天,我们的生物技术产品,帮助提高在各种疾病领域的无数病人的生命,我们的Numberone生物制剂的制造商。我们还投资在聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术时,它仍然是处于起步阶段 - 已经帮助我们成为全球市场的领导者,在分子诊断决定。

新药的发现,开发和商业化需要时间和眼光。为了保持在创新的前沿,它是必不可少的,早期投资有前途的新技术。

今天我们正投资于技术之一,它提供了一种目标和“关闭”特定基因的RNA干扰(RNAi)。 RNAi为基础的药物可以证明一个突破性的新方法,以防止疾病和帮助患者。

以一个长远的眼光
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:45:15 | 显示全部楼层
礼来公司的创业发展史

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/c ... nd-company-history/
Company Perspectives: Eli Lilly and Company creates and delivers innovative medicines that enable people to live longer, healthier and more active lives.

Key Dates:

1876: Colonel Eli Lilly starts making ethical drugs in Indianapolis.
1881:Company is incorporated.
1886illy hired its first scientist, Ernest Eberhardt, to establish one of the first pharmaceutical research and development programs.
1923:Eli Lilly and Company begins selling Iletin, the first commercially available insulin.
1940silly becomes one of the first companies to begin mass producing penicillin.
1950silly introduces two important antibiotics: erythromycin and vancomycin.
1960silly introduces cephalosporin antibiotics and anticancer drugs vincristine and vinblastine.
1971:The company buys cosmetics manufacturer Elizabeth Arden.
1977:IVAC Corporation is acquired. 1978:Cardiac Pacemakers Inc. is acquired.
1980:Company acquires PhysioControl Corporation.
1982illy introduces Humulin, the company's human insulin and the first human-healthcare item made by recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering).
1987:Eli Lilly sells Elizabeth Arden cosmetics business to Fabergé for $657 million.
1987:FDA approves the use of Prozac for treating depression.
1996:Zyprexa is introduced as a new treatment for schizophrenia.
1998:Company dedicates its new laboratories for clinical research at Indiana University Medical Center in Indianapolis. 1999:Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. and Lilly launch Actos, an oral diabetes agent that acts as an insulin sensitizer. 2001atent protection for Prozac ends in the United States, opening competition from generic versions.
2002illy becomes the fourth major drug company to offer big discounts for needy patients.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:45:38 | 显示全部楼层
礼来公司的创业发展史

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/c ... nd-company-history/
公司展望:礼来公司创建并提供创新药物,使人们活得更长,更健康,更积极的生活。

关键日期:

1876年礼来上校开始在印第安纳波利斯的处方药。
1881年:公司成立。
1886年礼来公司聘请的第一位科学家,欧内斯特EBERHARDT,建立一个第一医药的研究和发展计划。
1923年礼来公司开始销售Iletin,第一市售的胰岛素。
20世纪40年代:礼来公司成为第一家公司开始大规模生产青霉素。
20世纪50年代:礼来公司引入了两个重要的抗生素:红霉素,万古霉素。
20世纪60年代:礼来公司介绍头孢菌素类抗生素和抗癌药物长春新碱和长春碱。
1971年该公司购买化妆品制造商伊丽莎白雅顿。
收购1977:IVAC公司。 1978年:心脏起搏器公司被收购。
1980年:公司获得PhysioControl公司。
1982年礼来公司介绍,该公司的人胰岛素优泌林和人类第一次医疗项目,通过重组DNA技术(基因工程)。
1987礼来卖伊丽莎白·雅顿化妆品业务费伯奇为6.57亿美元。
1987年:FDA批准使用百忧解治疗抑郁症的。
1996年:再普乐介绍,作为一种新的治疗精神分裂症。
1998年:公司致力于在印第安纳波利斯的印第安纳大学医学中心临床研究的新的实验室。 1999年:武田药品工业株式会社和礼来公司推出的Actos,作为胰岛素增敏剂,口服降糖剂。 2001年:百忧解结束在美国的专利保护,开放竞争的仿制版本。
2002年:礼来成为第四大制药公司,为有需要的病人提供大折扣。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:46:25 | 显示全部楼层
辉瑞的历史更早 1772年创办

Company Perspectives:

Our Mission: We will achieve and sustain our place as the world's premier research-based health care company. Our continuing success as a business will benefit patients and our customers, our shareholders, our families, and the communities in which we operate around the world. Key Dates:

Key Dates:

1772:Henry Nock founds the business that eventually becomes Wilkinson Sword. 1849:Charles Pfizer and Charles Erhart found Charles Pfizer & Company. 1866arke-Davis is founded in Detroit by Hervey C. Parke and George S. Davis.

1870sr. Joseph Lawrence develops the original formula for Listerine. 1877:Wilkinson Sword begins making straight razors. 1881awrence sells his formula to Jordan Wheat Lambert, who founds Lambert Pharmacal Company. 1886:William R. Warner founds William R. Warner & Company. 1899:Several major U.S. gum producers merge to form American Chicle. 1900:Charles Pfizer & Company Inc. is incorporated in New Jersey. 1916:Warner & Co. acquires Richard Hudnut Company, a cosmetics firm. 1921:Colonel Jacob Schick invents the Magazine Repeating Razor, forerunner of the Schick Injector razor. 1942fizer goes public. 1944fizer begins mass production of penicillin, primarily for the war effort. 1950fizer launches Terramycin, an antibiotic; Warner & Co. is renamed Warner-Hudnut, Inc. 1955:Warner-Hudnut merges with Lambert Pharmacal to form Warner-Lambert Company. 1962:Warner-Lambert acquires American Chicle. 1970:Charles Pfizer & Company is renamed Pfizer Inc.; Warner-Lambert acquires Schick and Parke, Davis. 1984:Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is founded. 1989fizer launches Procardia XL. 1992fizer launches Novasc, Zoloft, and Zithromax. 1993:Warner-Lambert acquires Wilkinson Sword. 1995fizer acquires the animal health unit of SmithKline Beecham. 1997:Warner-Lambert launches Lipitor through a marketing alliance with Pfizer. 1998fizer divests its Medical Technology Group; Pfizer launches Viagra. 1999fizer begins comarketing Celebrex; Warner-Lambert acquires Agouron Pharmaceuticals. 2000fizer acquires Warner-Lambert.

Company History:

Further Reading:

Alger, Alexandra, 'Viagra Falls,' Forbes, February 7, 2000, pp. 130--32.
Barrett, Amy, 'The Formula at Pfizer: Don't Run with the Crowd,' Business Week, May 11, 1998, pp. 96--97.
Baum, Laurie, 'A Powerful Tonic for Warner-Lambert,' Business Week, November 30, 1987, pp. 144, 146.
Benway, Susan Duffy, 'Just What the Doctor Ordered: `Restructuring' Revives Warner Lambert,' Barron's, December 30, 1985, pp. 35+.
Bradford, Stacey L., 'Sweet Dreams: Gum and Mints May Help Warner-Lambert Become a Bigger Success in Drugs,' Financial World, October 21, 1996, pp. 44--45.
Byrne, Harlan S., 'Warner-Lambert: On the Mend,' Barron's, January 2, 1995, pp. 19--20.
Campanella, Frank W., 'Healthy Turnaround: Warner-Lambert Is Poised for an Earnings Recovery,' Barron's, February 1, 1982, pp. 35+.
Davenport, Caroline H., 'Glowing Prospects: New Products Will Keep Pfizer Growing at a Healthy Clip,' Barron's, December 22, 1980.
'Did Warner-Lambert Make a `$468 Million Mistake'?,' Business Week, November 21, 1983, pp. 123+.
Gibson, W. David, 'R & D = Rx for Growth: That's Warner-Lambert's New Corporate Formula,' Barron's, February 20, 1984, pp. 13+.
Hayes, John R., 'Pill Selling 101,' Forbes, November 21, 1994, p. 64.
Hensley, Scott, 'Pfizer Appoints McKinnell to Top Posts,' Wall Street Journal, August 11, 2000, p. B10.
LaBell, Fran, 'Fat Extenders in Salad Dressings,' Food Processing, May 1992, p. 64.
Langreth, Robert, 'Behind Pfizer's Takeover Battle: An Urgent Need,' Wall Street Journal, February 8, 2000, p. B1.
------, 'Pfizer's Warner-Lambert Purchase Contains Big Prize: Pipeline of Biotechnology Unit Agouron Is Stuffed with Potential Blockbusters,' Wall Street Journal, April 24, 2000, p. B4.
------, 'Pfizer, Warner-Lambert Agree on Terms,' Wall Street Journal, February 7, 2000, p. A3.
Langreth, Robert, and Waldholz, Michael, 'Pfizer Pins Multibillion-Dollar Hopes on Impotence Pill,' Wall Street Journal, March 19, 1998, p. B1.
Loynd, Harry J., Parke-Davis: The Never-Ending Search for Better Medicines, New York: Newcomen Society in North America, 1957.
Lubove, Seth, 'Failure Focuses the Mind,' Forbes, November 8, 1993, pp. 76--78.
Mahar, Maggie, 'Legal Heartbreak?: Pfizer Faces Huge Liability If It Loses a Key Lawsuit,' Barron's, April 2, 1990, pp. 8+.
Mines, Samuel, Pfizer: An Informal History, New York: Pfizer, 1978.
O'Reilly, Brian, 'The Pills That Saved Warner-Lambert,' Fortune, October 13, 1997, pp. 94--95.
'Pfizer: Counting on `Spare Parts' to Keep Up Its Momentum,' Business Week, January 9, 1984, pp. 109+.
'Pfizer Joins with Other Drug Makers on Price Control,' Chemical Marketing Reporter, February 1, 1993, p. 7.
'Pfizer Wins U.S. FDA Approval for Norvasc,' European Chemical News, August 17, 1992, p. 23.
Pratt, Edmund T., Jr., Pfizer: Bringing Science to Life, New York: Newcomen Society of the United States, 1985.
Rodengen, Jeffrey L., The Legend of Pfizer, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.: Write Stuff Syndicate, 1999.
Roman, Monica, 'Pfizer Finally Sees Its Payoff,' Business Week, July 1, 1991, pp. 86+.
------, 'Pfizer's Pipeline Is Full, But Will the Drugs Flow Fast Enough?,' Business Week, September 11, 1989, pp. 74+.
Rundle, Rhonda L., and Waldholz, Michael, 'Warner-Lambert Agrees to Buy Agouron,' Wall Street Journal, January 27, 1999, p. A3.
Schroeder, Michael, 'Heart Trouble at Pfizer,' Business Week, February 26, 1990, pp. 47+.
Starr, Cynthia, 'First-Ever Alzheimer's Drug Brings Some Hope to Millions,' Drug Topics, October 11, 1993, pp. 16--18.
Stipp, David, 'Why Pfizer Is So Hot,' Fortune, May 11, 1998, pp. 88--90, 92, 94.
Tanner, Ogden, Twenty-Five Years of Innovation: The Story of Pfizer Central Research, Lyme, Conn.: Greenwich Publishing, 1996.
'Turning Warner-Lambert into a Marketing Conglomerate,' Business Week, March 5, 1979, p. 60.
'Warner-Lambert: Reversing Direction to Correct Neglect,' Business Week, June 15, 1981, pp. 65+.
Weber, Joseph, 'Curing Warner-Lambert--Before It Gets Sick,' Business Week, December 9, 1991, pp. 91, 94.
Weber, Joseph, et al., 'The New Era of Lifestyle Drugs,' Business Week, May 11, 1998, pp. 92+.
Zipser, Andy, 'Beyond Shiley: A Vote for Pfizer,' Barron's, May 27, 1991, pp. 28+.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 38. St. James Press, 2001.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:46:47 | 显示全部楼层
辉瑞的历史更早1772年创办

公司观点:

我们的使命:作为世界上首屈一指的以研究为基础的医疗保健公司,我们将实现并维持我们的地方。我们作为一个企业的持续成功,将有利于患者和我们的客户,我们的股东,我们的家庭和我们经营所在的社区在世界各地。关键日期:

关键日期:

1772:亨利·诺克创建的业务,最终成为威尔金森。 1849年查尔斯·辉瑞和查尔斯尔哈特发现查尔斯·辉瑞公司。 1866:帕克 - 戴维斯成立于底特律,赫维C.帕克和乔治·戴维斯。

1870年:博士约瑟夫·劳伦斯开发李施德林的原配方。 1877:威尔金森开始直剃须刀。 1881:劳伦斯约旦小麦兰伯特创建兰伯特Pharmacal的公司,谁出卖了自己的公式。 1886年:威廉·R·华纳创建威廉·R·华纳公司。 1899年:美国几大口香糖生产商合并,以形成美国糖胶树胶。 1900年:查尔斯·辉瑞公司公司在新泽西州注册成立。 1916年华纳公司收购了理查德·赫德纳特公司,化妆品公司。 1921年:雅各布上校,希克发明杂志重复先行者希克喷油器剃须刀剃须刀,。 1942年:辉瑞公司上市。 1944年,辉瑞公司开始大规模生产青霉素,主要用于战争的努力。 1950年,辉瑞推出土霉素,抗生素;华纳公司更名为华纳赫德纳特,1955年公司:华纳赫德纳特华纳 - 兰伯特公司合并兰伯特Pharmacal的形成。 1962年:华纳 - 兰伯特公司收购美国糖胶树胶。 1970年:查尔斯·辉瑞公司更名为辉瑞公司收购华纳 - 兰伯特希克和帕克,戴维斯。 1984年:Agouron公司制药公司成立。 1989年:辉瑞公司推出Procardia的XL。 1992年辉瑞公司推出Novasc,左洛复,希舒美。 1993年:华纳 - 兰伯特公司收购了威尔金森。 1995年,辉瑞收购史克必成的动物健康单位。 1997年:华纳 - 兰伯特公司推出通过一个营销联盟与辉瑞公司的立普妥。 1998年辉瑞公司剥离其医疗科技集团;辉瑞启动伟哥。 1999年辉瑞公司开始葆comarketing;华纳 - 兰伯特公司收购Agouron公司制药。 2000年辉瑞收购华纳 - 兰伯特公司。

公司发展历程:

更多阅读:

阿尔及尔,亚历山德拉,'伟哥瀑布“,”福布斯“,2000年2月7日,第130 - 32。
巴雷特,艾米,在辉瑞的公式:不要运行的人群中,“商业周刊”,1998年5月11日,第96 - 97。
鲍姆,劳丽,“一个强大的滋补华纳 - 兰伯特公司,”商业周刊“1987年11月30日,第144页,146。
Benway,苏珊·达菲,“究竟什么医生下令:'重组'复活华纳兰伯特”,“巴伦周刊”1985年12月30日,第35 +。
布拉德福德,斯泰西L.,“甜梦:口香糖和薄荷糖可能帮助华纳 - 兰伯特成为一个更大的毒品成功,”金融世界,10月21日,1996年,第44 - 45。
拜恩,哈伦S.,“华纳 - 兰伯特:在好转,”巴伦周刊“1995年1月2日,第19 - 20页。
康帕内拉,弗兰克W.,“健康转机:华纳 - 兰伯特公司是一个盈利复苏蓄势待发”,“巴伦周刊”1982年2月1日,第35 +。
卡罗琳H.达文波特,“发光的前景:新产品将保持辉瑞生长在一个健康的剪辑,”巴伦周刊“1980年12月22日。
“华纳 - 兰伯特`4.68亿美元错误','商业周刊”,1983年11月21日,第123页+。
吉布森,W.大卫,R&D = RX增长:这是华纳 - 兰伯特公司的新企业公式“,”巴伦周刊“1984年2月20日,第13 +。
海耶斯,约翰·R.,“丸卖101,”福布斯“11月21日,1994年,第。 64。
亨斯利,斯科特,“辉瑞任命马金龙热门帖子,”华尔街日报“8月11日,2000年,页。 B10。
LaBell,弗兰,在沙拉酱的脂肪补充剂,食品加工,1992年5月,第64。
Langreth,罗伯特背后,辉瑞公司的收购战:迫切需要,“华尔街日报”2月8日,2000年,页。 B1中。
------'辉瑞公司华纳 - 兰伯特公司采购包含大奖:管道生物技术单位Agouron公司是潜在的重磅炸弹酿“,”华尔街日报“4月24日,2000年,页。 B4。
------“,辉瑞制药,华纳 - 兰伯特公司同意条款,”华尔街日报“2月7日,2000年,第。 A3。
Langreth,罗伯特,迈克尔,Waldholz辉瑞针脚数十亿美元希望对阳痿丸“,”华尔街日报“3月19日,1998年,第B1中。
Loynd,哈里J.,帕克 - 戴维斯:永无止境的寻找更好的药物,纽约:纽科学会在北美,1957年。
Lubove,赛斯'失败重在心灵“,”福布斯“1993年11月8日,第76 - 78页。
马哈尔,张曼玉,“法律心碎?:辉瑞公司面临着巨大的责任,如果它失去一个关键诉讼,”巴伦周刊“1990年4月2日,第8 +。
矿山,萨穆埃尔,辉瑞:一个非正式的历史,纽约:1978年辉瑞。
奥赖利,布赖恩丸救华纳 - 兰伯特公司,“财富”1997年10月13日,第94 - 95。
“辉瑞公司:计数上`备件跟上其势头,”商业周刊“1984年1月9日,第109 +。
“辉瑞加入与其他药物庄家的价格控制,'化工有限公司营销部记者,1993年2月1日。 7。
“辉瑞公司获得美国FDA批准络活喜”,1992年8月17日,欧洲化学新闻。 23。
普拉特,埃德蒙·T.小,辉瑞:把生命科学,纽约:美国纽科学会,1985。
Rodengen中,Jeffrey L.,辉瑞,FT传奇。美国佛罗里达州劳德代尔:写东西辛迪加,1999年。
罗马,莫妮卡“,辉瑞公司终于看到它的回报,”商业周刊“1991年7月1日,第86 +。
------'辉瑞公司的管道是完整,但药流的速度不够快“,”商业周刊“1989年9月11日,第74页+。
朗德尔,朗达L.和Waldholz的的,迈克尔,“华纳 - 兰伯特商定购买Agouron公司的,”华尔街日报1月27日,1999年,第。 A3。
施罗德,迈克尔,“心疾辉瑞公司2月26日,”商业周刊“,1990年,第47页+。
斯塔尔,辛西娅,“有史以来第一次老年痴呆症的药物带来了一些希望,数以百万计,”药品主题1993年10月11日,第16页 - 18。
斯泰普,大卫,辉瑞为什么这么热“,”财富“,1998年5月11日,第88 - 90,92,94。
坦纳,奥格登,二十五年的创新:辉瑞中央研究,莱姆,康涅狄格州格林威治出版,1996年的故事。
“谈到华纳 - 兰伯特成营销砾岩,”商业周刊“1979年3月5日,第。 60。
华纳 - 兰伯特:反转方向正确的忽视,“商业周刊”6月15日,1981年,第65页+。
韦伯,约瑟夫,固化华纳 - 兰伯特 - 生病之前,“商业周刊”1991年12月9日,第91页,94。
,约瑟夫·韦伯等人,“新时代的生活方式药,”商业周刊“5月11日,1998年,第92页+。
ZIPSER,刘德华,除了希利:辉瑞公司的一票,“巴伦周刊”1991年5月27日,第28页+。


资料来源:公司历史,国际指南。 38。圣雅各福群出版社,2001。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:47:14 | 显示全部楼层
雅培创办史及发展史

Company Perspectives:

Abbott's vision is to be the world's premier health care company. Simply put, we want to be the best--the best employer, the best health care supplier, the best business partner, the best investment and the best neighbor. While Abbott is broadly diversified, all of its thousands of products and people are dedicated to a common mission: to improve lives by providing cost-effective health care products and services. Key Dates:

Key Dates:

1888r. Wallace Calvin Abbott begins manufacturing alkaloid pills. 1900:Abbott incorporates his firm as Abbott Alkaloidal Company. 1915:Company changes its name to Abbott Laboratories. 1929:Abbott goes public with a listing on the Chicago Stock Exchange. 1936:Company introduces the anesthetic sodium pentothal. 1952:Company launches a new antibiotic, Erythrocin. 1964:Abbott acquires M & R Dietetic Laboratories, maker of Similac baby formula. 1967:New president Edward J. Ledder begins a diversification into consumer products, including Sucaryl, a cyclamate sugar substitute. 1970:FDA bans the sale of cyclamates. 1971:Abbott is forced to recall 3.4 million bottles of intravenous solution. 1977:Company forms joint venture with Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. of Japan called TAP Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1985:Abbott develops the first diagnostic test for AIDS. 1987:Abbott's Hytrin is approved by the FDA for the treatment of hypertension. 1991:Clorithromycin, an antibiotic, is introduced. 1996:Abbott acquires MediSense, Inc., a maker of blood-testing devices for diabetics. 1999:Abbott agrees to acquire ALZA Corporation for $7.3 billion but the deal later collapses; Abbott agrees to pay a $100 million fine relating to quality control problems at its medical test kit plants; suture maker Perclose, Inc. is acquired. 2000:FDA approves the AIDS drug Kaletra; Abbott agrees to acquire the Knoll Pharmaceutical Co. unit of BASF AG for $6.9 billion in cash.

Company History:

Abbott Laboratories is one of the oldest and most successful pharmaceutical companies in the United States. While about 30 percent of annual revenues come from the sale of pharmaceuticals--including Abbott's flagship drug, the antibiotic Biaxin--the company has a higher profile in the area of nutritionals, where its products include leading infant formula brands Similac and Isomil and a leading adult nutritional brand, Ensure. Abbott is also a top manufacturer of medical diagnostic equipment, with an emphasis on blood analyzers and the detection and monitoring of infections and diseases. The firm's hospital products unit produces electronic and injectable drug-delivery systems, intravenous solutions and supplies, anesthetics, and products used in critical care settings. Abbott's annual research and development budget exceeds $1 billion, with areas of emphasis including AIDS/antivirals, anti-infectives, diabetes, neuroscience, oncology, pediatric pharmaceuticals, urology, and vascular medicine.

Early Decades

Abbott Laboratories has its origin in the late 19th century in a small pharmaceutical operation run from the kitchen of a Chicago physician named Wallace Calvin Abbott. As did other physicians of the time, Dr. Abbott commonly prescribed morphine, quinine, strychnine, and codeine--all of which were liquid alkaloid extracts--for his patients. Because they existed only in a liquid form, these drugs were prone to spoilage over time, mitigating their effectiveness as treatments. In 1888, Dr. Abbott heard that a Belgian surgeon had developed alkaloids in solid form. Alkaloid pills soon became available in Chicago, but Dr. Abbott was dissatisfied with their quality, and he decided to manufacture his own.

Dr. Abbott began to advertise his products to other doctors in 1891. So successful was his business that he eventually sold shares to other doctors and incorporated his operation in 1900 as the Abbott Alkaloidal Company. By 1905, annual sales had grown to $200,000. Ten years later, the company changed its name to Abbott Laboratories. During World War I, Abbott's company was essential to the medical community, as several important drugs, manufactured exclusively by German companies, were no longer available in the United States. Abbott developed procaine, a substitute for the German novocaine, and barbital, a replacement for veneral.

After the war, Abbott continued to concentrate on the research and development of new drugs. In 1921, the company established a laboratory in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, which developed a number of new drugs, including sedatives, tranquilizers, and vitamins. Even after Dr. Abbott's death that year, the company continued to invest heavily in new product development and aggressive marketing campaigns. The company went public in 1929 with a listing on the Chicago Stock Exchange. Two years later, Abbott expanded outside the United States for the first time with the establishment of an affiliate in Montreal, Canada.

DeWitt Clough was named president of the company in 1933, ending a period of somewhat stale communal leadership. A more dynamic character than any since Dr. Abbott, Clough is best remembered for the inauguration of the company magazine, What's New? The publication had such a positive impact on worker morale and public opinion that several of Abbott's competitors started similar publications. In 1936 Abbott began its long-term association with anesthetics when it introduced sodium pentothal, which had been developed by Abbott scientists Ernest Volwiler and Donalee Tabern (who in 1986 were named to the U.S. Inventors Hall of Fame for this discovery).

During World War II, Abbott once again played an important role in battlefield and hospital healthcare. By this time, American pharmaceutical companies such as Abbott were much less dependent on Germany's companies, particularly the IG Farben--a conglomeration of the world's most advanced drug manufacturers. After the war, much of the IG Farben's research was turned over to American manufacturers. Abbott, however, had little to gain from this information; it was already a worthy competitor on its own.

After the departure of DeWitt Clough in 1945, Abbott shifted its attention to the development of antibiotics. The company developed the antibiotic erythromycin, which, introduced under the brand names Erythrocin and E.E.S. in 1952, constituted a significant portion of Abbott's prescription drug sales for several decades--even after the expiration of its 17-year patent. Sales of the drug increased dramatically when it was found to be an effective treatment for Legionnaire's disease.

Abbott stumbled onto a lucrative new product when one of its researchers accidentally discovered that a chemical with which he had been working had a sweet taste. The chemical, a cyclamate, could be used as an artificial sweetener. Initially, from 1950, it was marketed to diabetics, but in the 1960s, as Americans became more health and diet conscious, it was increasingly used as a sugar substitute in a wide variety of foods.

In 1964 Abbott completed the first major acquisition in company history when it purchased Columbus, Ohio-based M & R Dietetic Laboratories. M & R was the manufacturer of Similac baby formula and over the succeeding decades, as the company's Ross Products Division, formed the basis for Abbott's market-leading infant and adult nutritionals business.

Late 1960s and Early 1970s: Diversification and Crises

By the mid-1960s, Abbott had gone several years without a major breakthrough in research, and none was projected at any time in the immediate future. Then, in 1967, Edward J. Ledder was named president of the company. He advocated a reduction in Abbott's emphasis on pharmaceuticals by diversifying into other fields. In the years that followed, Abbott introduced an array of consumer products, including Pream nondairy creamer, Glad Hands rubber gloves, Faultless golf balls, and Sucaryl, the cyclamate sugar substitute. In an effort to ensure the success of Abbott's consumer product line, Ledder placed Melvin Birnbaum, a highly experienced and able manager he had hired away from Revlon, in charge of the division. Ledder's policy of diversification laid the groundwork for more flexible corporate strategies. No longer exposed exclusively within the pharmaceuticals market, Abbott was able to cross-subsidize failing operations until they could be rehabilitated.

Despite this flexibility, Abbott soon realized new obstacles to its growth. The company's hospital products competed in a limited, institutional market. New drugs had greater profit margins but were subject to government approval procedures that kept companies waiting for several years before they could market their discoveries. Consumer products, on the other hand, involved more expensive marketing and generated less profit than pharmaceuticals. Unable to increase profits without substantial risk, Abbott's management decided to maintain the strategies that were in place.

Cyclamate sales had grown so dramatically that by 1969 they accounted for one-third of Abbott's consumer product revenues--or about $50 million. The increasing popularity of cyclamates as an ingredient in diet foods, however, led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct an investigation of possible side effects from their overuse. The FDA's research was widely criticized as 'fragmentary' and 'fatally flawed,' but it was nonetheless used as evidence that cyclamates were carcinogenic. The market collapsed in August 1970 when the FDA banned domestic sales of cyclamates. Abbott, which overnight had suffered the loss of one of its most profitable operations, protested the ban, but was unable to reverse the decision. Although the company continued to petition the FDA, subsequent studies confirmed that metabolization of cyclamates can lead to chromosome breakage and bladder cancer.

Less than a year after cyclamates were banned, Abbott was forced to recall 3.4 million bottles of intravenous solution. The bottles were sealed with a varnished paper called Gilsonite, which, it was discovered, harbored bacteria. The contamination was discovered only when healthcare workers noticed and then investigated the high incidence of infection in patients who had been administered Abbott's intravenous solutions. The Center for Disease Control linked the contaminated solutions to at least 434 infections and 49 deaths. With sales down from $17.9 million to $3 million, Abbott's share price began to fall. Abbott moved quickly to replace its Gilsonite seals with synthetic rubber, but the company was unable to regain its leadership of the intravenous market. Litigation resulted in the company eventually pleading no contest to a charge of conspiracy and paying a $1,000 fine.

Late 1970s Through 1980s: Emphasizing R & D, Nutritionals, Diagnostic Equipment

The crises of the early 1970s left the company's upper echelon of management weakened and vulnerable to criticism. Although Edward Ledder was recognized for the success of his diversification program (and largely excused for his inability to prevent either the cyclamate ban or the intravenous solution crisis), conditions were obviously ripe for the expression of talent by a new manager. Robert Schoellhorn, a veteran of the chemical industry, was just such a manager. His efforts as a vice-president in the hospital products division at Abbott resulted in a revenue increase of 139 percent for that division between 1974 and 1979. He correctly predicted that the next most profitable trend in healthcare would be toward cost-effective analysis and treatment. Schoellhorn was later promoted to president and chief operating officer of the company. Meantime, in 1977 Abbott entered into a joint venture with Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. of Japan called TAP Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the codevelopment and comarketing of pharmaceuticals.

Abbott Laboratories registered an annual sales growth rate of 15.5 percent and an earnings growth rate of 16.5 percent by 1979. This expansion was attributed by financial analysts to the company's increased productivity, reduced costs, expansion into foreign markets, and greater involvement in hospital nutritionals and diagnostic testing equipment. The company also introduced three new drugs in 1979: Depakene, an anticonvulsant; Tranxene, a mild tranquilizer; and Abbokinase, a treatment for blood clots in the lungs. All three products were the direct result of the company's increased investment in research and development in the mid-1970s.

Utilizing its knowledge of intravenous solution production, vitamin therapy, and infant formula, Abbott developed a comprehensive nutritional therapy program to speed the recovery of hospital patients and thereby reduce medical care costs. In the 1980s, as many as 65 percent of all hospital patients suffered from some form of malnutrition, so Abbott was highly successful in marketing their program. Another advantage of adult nutritional products was that they had a place in the growing home care market.

Abbott had similar success marketing its lines of diagnostic equipment. Electronic testing devices developed by Abbott proved more accurate than manual procedures. In order to strengthen the technical end of its diagnostic equipment research, Abbott hired two top executives away from Texas Instruments to head the division.

Robert Schoellhorn, who advanced to chairperson and chief executive officer in 1979, continued to emphasize investment in pharmaceutical research and development in the 1980s. Seven new drugs introduced in 1982 accounted for 17 percent of sales in 1985. Foreign operations also remained extremely important to Abbott, and the company had more than 75 foreign subsidiaries and manufacturing facilities in more than 30 countries. Schoellhorn continued to support Ledder's original diversification policy. The introduction of Murine eye-care products and Selsun Blue dandruff shampoo served to expand the domestic consumer product line and promised to provide earning stability in the event of a downturn in any of the company's other markets.

Schoellhorn was also credited with promoting Abbott's emphasis on diagnostic equipment, especially blood analyzers. These devices were increasingly used to detect legal and illegal substances in the bloodstream. Abbott led the trend, developing the first diagnostic tests for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), in 1985, and hepatitis. The company's 'Vision' blood analyzer fit on a desktop and performed 90 percent of typical blood tests within eight minutes. By the end of the 1980s, sales of blood analysis devices represented a billion-dollar business, and medical diagnostic products (at $2.3 billion per year) constituted nearly half of Abbott's annual sales. Meanwhile, in the pharmaceuticals arena, Abbott in 1987 received FDA approval for a new drug called Hytrin for the treatment of hypertension. Hytrin was approved in 1993 for the treatment of noncancerous enlarged prostate.

Schoellhorn was widely praised as the driving force behind Abbott's phenomenal growth during the 1980s--sales nearly tripled, profits doubled, and the pharmaceutical company rose to 90th from 197th on Fortune's list of the world's top 500 companies. The leader's aggressive management style, however, often led to conflict. Over the course of the 1980s, three presidents--James L. Vincent (1981); Kirk Raab (1985); and Jack W. Schuler (1989)--quit. In December 1989, Abbott's board of directors unseated Schoellhorn, who in turn sued the company for his job. Abbott accused Schoellhorn of misappropriation of company assets and 'fraudulent conduct,' adding that the former CEO exercised stock options worth $9.3 million within days of his release. Schoellhorn was succeeded by Vice-Chairman Duane L. Burnham.

1990s and Beyond: New Drug Introductions and Acquisitions

Unlike many of its competitors (including Merck, SmithKline Beecham, and Eli Lilly), Abbott did not acquire a drug distribution manager in the early 1990s. Instead, the company plowed funds into research and development. R & D outlays rose from 5.2 percent of sales in 1982 to more than 10 percent of sales by 1994--by the latter year, R & D expenditures neared $1 billion. That year marked the company's 23rd consecutive earnings lift and helped Abbott's stock hold its value better than most competitors in the uncertain healthcare environment of the early 1990s.

Among key developments in the early 1990s was the introduction in 1991 of clorithromycin, an antibiotic developed as a successor to Abbott's erythromycin. Marketed in the United States under the name Biaxin, clorithromycin was useful in the treatment of common upper respiratory ailments such as the flu as well as other types of infections. It quickly became Abbott's flagship pharmaceutical--eventually achieving $1 billion in annual sales--remaining so into the early 21st century.

New product introductions continued in the middle years of the decade. In 1994 Abbott introduced sevoflurane, an inhalation anesthetic that soon gained popularity because of its wide range of uses. The following year, TAP, the joint venture with Takeda Chemical, received FDA approval for Prevacid, an ulcer treatment (sales of Prevacid reached $1.3 billion by 1998). In 1996 FDA clearance was granted for Norvir, a protease inhibitor for the treatment of HIV and AIDS.

Despite these R & D successes, Abbott's earnings were failing to increase at the high-double-digit rate that they had in the 1980s, and the company was beginning to face the risk of being gobbled up by a larger rival in the rapidly consolidating healthcare industry of the 1990s. Shrugging off the conservative management of the early 1990s, Abbott moved aggressively in the second half of the decade to expand via acquisition and thereby stave off being acquired itself. In 1996 Abbott bolstered its diagnostics division through the $867 million purchase of MediSense, Inc., a Waltham, Massachusetts-based maker of blood-testing devices for diabetics. This was the company's first major deal since the 1964 acquisition of M & R Dietetic Laboratories. In 1997 Abbott spent about $200 million for certain intravenous product lines of Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. unit of France's Sanofi S.A. Included in this deal was Carpujet, an injectable drug-delivery system based on preloaded, single-dose syringes. Also in 1997, Abbott suffered a potential setback when Takeda Chemical did not renew a ten-year contract that gave Abbott the right of first refusal to distribute Takeda's new drugs in the United States via the TAP venture. Takeda had decided to set up its own sales and marketing organization in the United States. By this time TAP was generating annual sales in excess of $2 billion, primarily from the marketing of Prevacid and Lupron, a prostate-cancer drug.

By 1997 Abbott had doubled its sales and earnings since Burnham had taken over from the ousted Schoellhorn. In early 1998 Burnham announced that he would retire in 1999. At the beginning of that year, Miles D. White, who had been a senior vice-president in charge of the diagnostics division, took over as CEO. Later in 1999, White was named chairman as well. During the leadership transition period in 1998, Abbott acquired Murex Technologies Corporation, a maker of diagnostics products, for $234 million. During 1999, Abbott's appetite for growth increased exponentially with the announcement in June of a deal to acquire ALZA Corporation for $7.3 billion in stock. ALZA was a leading producer of advanced drug-delivery systems and had a solid pipeline of new pharmaceuticals under development. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), however, raised antitrust concerns about the merger, and when the two sides were unable to reach an agreement with the FTC, they called off the merger in December. Another possible factor in the collapse of the deal was the decline in Abbott's stock price following the company's agreement in November to pull 125 types of medical-diagnostic test kits off the U.S. market and to pay a $100 million civil penalty to the U.S. government. Since 1993 the FDA had been issuing warnings to Abbott regarding quality control deficiencies at its test kit plants, with the market withdrawal and payment of the fine being the outcome of this process. The FDA also cited poor manufacturing controls as the reason for its halting the sales of Abbott's clot-dissolving agent Abbokinase in early 1999.

In the meantime, Abbott managed to complete two smaller acquisitions in 1999. It acquired Perclose, Inc., a maker of sutures used to close arteries during angioplasty procedures, for about $600 million in stock. Abbott also paid $217 million in cash to Glaxo Wellcome Inc. for five anesthesia products. In January 2000 Abbott sold its agricultural products business to Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. Abbott was now for the first time in decades a pure healthcare firm. Abbott in April of that year began marketing Biaxin XL, a new once-daily formulation of its flagship Biaxin antibiotic. The FDA in September 2000 granted expedited approval to Kaletra, a second-generation AIDS medication developed by Abbott. Kaletra had the potential to overtake the top AIDS drug, Pfizer Inc.'s Viracept, because it had fewer side effects. It also appeared that patients did not develop resistance to Kaletra over time, as happened with most other AIDS drugs, including Viracept. Then in December 2000 Abbott launched another attempt at a major acquisition when it reached an agreement to acquire the Knoll Pharmaceutical Co. unit of German chemical giant BASF AG for $6.9 billion in cash. Once again, Abbott's aim was to bolster its product pipeline, and Knoll had at least one potential blockbuster in a drug called D2E7, an experimental rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Knoll's existing products included Meridia, an obesity drug with annual sales of about $400 million, and Synthroid, a $150 million thyroid drug. The acquisition would also boost Abbott's pharmaceutical R & D budget to nearly $1 billion.

Principal Subsidiaries: Abbott Chemicals Plant, Inc.; Abbott Fermentation Products de Puerto Rico, Inc.; Abbott Health Products, Inc.; Abbott Home Infusion Services of New York, Inc.; Abbott International Ltd.; Abbott International Ltd. of Puerto Rico; Abbott Laboratories Inc.; Abbott Laboratories International Co.; Abbott Laboratories Pacific Ltd.; Abbott Laboratories (Puerto Rico) Incorporated; Abbott Laboratories Residential Development Fund, Inc.; Abbott Laboratories Services Corp.; Abbott Trading Company, Inc.; Abbott Universal Ltd.; AC Merger Sub Inc.; CMM Transportation, Inc.; Corporate Alliance, Inc.; IMTC Technologies, Inc.; Murex Diagnostics, Inc.; North Shore Properties, Inc.; Oximetrix de Puerto Rico, Inc.; Perclose, Inc.; Solartek Products, Inc.; Sorenson Research Co., Inc.; Swan-Myers, Incorporated; TAP Finance Inc.; Tobal Products Incorporated; Abbott Laboratories Argentina, S.A.; Abbott Australasia Pty. Limited (Australia); MediSense Australia Pty. Ltd.; Abbott Gesellschaft m.b.H. (Austria); Abbott Hospitals Limited (Bahamas); Murex Diagnostics International, Inc. (Barbados); Abbott, S.A. (Belgium); Abbott Laboratorios do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil); Abbott Laboratories Limited (Canada); International Murex Technologies Corporation (Canada); Abbott Laboratories de Chile Limitada (Chile); Abbott Laboratories de Colombia, S.A.; Abbott Laboratories s.r.o. (Czech Republic); Murex Diagnostica, Spol. s.r.o. (Czech Republic); Abbott Laboratories A/S (Denmark); Murex Diagnostics A/S (Denmark); Abbott Laboratorios del Ecuador, S.A.; Abbott, S.A. de C.V. (El Salvador); Abbott OY (Finland); Abbott France S.A.; Alcyon Analyzer S.A.; MediSense France SARL; Murex Diagnostics (France) S.A.; Abbott G.m.b.H. (Germany); Abbott Diagnostics G.m.b.H. (Germany); Murex Diagnostica GmbH (Germany); Abbott Laboratories (Hellas) S.A. (Greece); Abbott Laboratorios, S.A. (Guatemala); Abbott Laboratories Limited (Hong Kong); Abbott Laboratories (Hungary) Ltd.; Abbott Laboratories (India) Ltd. (51%); Abind Healthcare Private Limited (India); P.T. Abbott Indonesia (97%); Abbott Laboratories, Ireland, Limited; Abbott Ireland Ltd.; Abbott S.p.A. (Italy); Murex Diagnostici S.p.A. (Italy); Abbott Japan K.K. (Japan); Dainabot Co., Ltd. (Japan; 73%); Abbott Korea Limited; Abbott Middle East S.A.R.L. (Lebanon); Abbott Laboratories (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.; Abbott Laboratories de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.; Abbott Laboratories (Mozambique) Limitada; Edisco B.V. (Netherlands); Abbott B.V. (Netherlands); Abbott Laboratories B.V. (Netherlands); Abbott Finance B.V. (Netherlands); Abbott Holdings B.V. (Netherlands); MediSense Europe B.V. (Netherlands); MediSense Netherlands, B.V.; IMTC Holdings B.V. (Netherlands); IMTC Finance B.V. (Netherlands); Murex Diagnostics Benelux B.V. (Netherlands); Abbott Laboratories (N.Z.) Limited (New Zealand); Abbott Norge A S (Norway); Abbott Laboratories (Pakistan) Limited (83.42%); Abbott Laboratories, C.A. (Panama); Abbott Overseas, S.A. (Panama); Abbott Laboratorios S.A. (Peru); Abbott Laboratories (Philippines); Abbott Laboratories Sp. z.o.o. (Poland); Abbott Laboratorios, Limitada (Portugal); Abbott Laboratories (Singapore) Private Limited; Abbott Laboratories South Africa (Pty.) Limited; Abbott Laboratories, S.A. (Spain); Abbott Cientifica, S.A. (Spain); Abbott Scandinavia A.B. (Sweden); Abbott A.G. (Switzerland); Abbott Laboratories S.A. (Switzerland); Abbott Finance Company S.A. (Switzerland); Abbott Laboratories Taiwan Limited; Abbott Laboratories Limited (Thailand); Abbott Laboratuarlari Ithalat Ihracat Ve Tecaret Limited Sirketi (Turkey); Abbott Investments Limited (U.K.); Abbott Laboratories Limited (U.K.); Abbott (UK) Holdings Limited; Abbott Laboratories Trustee Company Limited (U.K.); IMTC Holdings (UK) Limited; MediSense Britain, Ltd. (U.K.); MediSense UK Ltd.; Murex Biotech Limited (U.K.); Specialist Diagnostica Limited (U.K.); Abbott Laboratories Uruguay Limitada; Abbott Laboratories, C.A. (Venezuela); Medicamentos M & R, S.A. (Venezuela).

Principal Divisions: Pharmaceutical Products; Ross Products; Hospital Products; Abbott International; Diagnostics; Specialty Products.

Principal Competitors: Merck & Co., Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; American Home Products Corporation; Johnson & Johnson; AstraZeneca PLC; Aventis; Bayer AG; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Schering-Plough Corporation; Novartis AG; Roche Holding Ltd.

Further Reading:

'Abbott: Profiting from Products That Cut Costs,' Business Week, June 18, 1984, pp. 56+.
'Baby Bottle Battle,' Forbes, November 28, 1988, pp. 222+.
Barrett, Amy, and Richard A. Melcher, 'Drugmaker, Heal Thyself,' Business Week, October 11, 1999, pp. 88+.
Benoit, Ellen, 'Abbott Laboratories: Room at the Top,' Financial World, October 17, 1989, p. 28.
Berss, Marcia, 'Aloof But Not Asleep,' Forbes, August 29, 1994, pp. 43-44.
Bleiberg, Robert M., 'Abbott and Costello: The Ban on Cyclamates Is a Comedy--or Tragedy--of Errors,' Barron's, October 9, 1978, p. 7.
'Bob Schoellhorn Is Refusing to Go Quietly,' Business Week, March 26, 1990, pp. 34+.
Burton, Thomas M., 'Abbott Laboratories and Alza Call Off Their Deal,' Wall Street Journal, December 17, 1999, p. B10.
------, 'Abbott Labs to Buy BASF Unit for $6.9 Billion,' Wall Street Journal, December 15, 2000, pp. A3, A12.
------, 'Abbott's White Wins CEO Job,' Wall Street Journal, September 16, 1998, p. A3.
------, 'Abbott to Pay $100 Million in Fine to United States,' Wall Street Journal, November 3, 1999, p. A3.
------, 'Federal Judge Clears Abbott in Formula Case: Bid Process for Infant Food Is Called `Questionable,' but Oversight Is Faulted,' Wall Street Journal, June 1, 1994, p. A3.
Carter, Kim, 'Abbott Laboratories Betting Its Future on the Development of New Products,' Modern Healthcare, November 7, 1986, pp. 138+.
Klein, Sarah A., 'Abbott's Biotech Biz Gets a Booster Shot: Picking Up Keys to State-of-the-Art Lab in BASF Deal,' Crain's Chicago Business, January 1, 2001, p. 4.
------, 'Restocked Product Pipeline Invigorating Abbott,' Crain's Chicago Business, September 4, 2000, p. 4.
Kogan, Herman, The Long White Line: The Story of Abbott Laboratories, New York: Random House, 1963, 309 p.
Merrion, Paul, 'Nestlé Sours Baby Formula for Abbott,' Crain's Chicago Business, June 13, 1988.
Miller, James P., 'Abbott Labs Agrees to Purchase Alza,' Wall Street Journal, June 22, 1999, p. A3.
------, 'Abbott Ousts Schoellhorn As Chairman, Drawing Lawsuit by Embattled Official,' Wall Street Journal, March 12, 1990, p. B6.
Oloroso, Arsenio, Jr., 'Abbott's Prescription for Sluggish Drug Biz Pays Off,' Crain's Chicago Business, October 21, 1991, p. 3.
------, 'Abbott's Tough Rx: Buy or Risk Being Bought,' Crain's Chicago Business, March 2, 1998, p. 3.
------, 'Abbott Tries Costly Growth Drug: M & A,' Crain's Chicago Business, April 8, 1996, p. 4.
------, 'New CEO Poised to Rev Up Sleepy Abbott's Strategy,' Crain's Chicago Business, September 21, 1998, p. 4.
Salwan, Kevin G., 'Infant-Formula Firms Rigged Bids, U.S. Says,' Wall Street Journal, June 12, 1992, p. A3.
Somasundaram, Meera, 'Abbott Set to Stock Medicine Cabinet: Drug Giant Expected to Shop for Mid-Sized Rivals,' Crain's Chicago Business, February 1, 1999, p. 1.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 40. St. James Press, 2001.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:47:36 | 显示全部楼层
雅培创办史及发展史

公司观点:

雅培公司的愿景是成为世界一流的医疗保健公司。简而言之,我们希望成为最好的 - 最好的雇主,最好的医疗保健供应商,最好的商业合作伙伴,最好的投资和最好的邻居。虽然雅培广泛多元化,其数以千计的产品与人们的一个共同的使命:提供符合成本效益的医疗保健产品和服务,以改善人们的生活。关键日期:

关键日期:

1888年:博士华莱士卡尔文雅培开始制造生物碱丸。 1900年:雅培雅培生物碱公司采用他的公司。 1915年:公司更名为雅培。 1929年:雅培上市芝加哥证券交易所上市。 1936年:公司介绍麻醉钠硫喷妥钠。 1952年:公司推出新的抗生素,红霉素。 1964年雅培收购M&R实验室,饮食的Similac婴儿配方奶粉制造商。 1967年:新总统爱德华J. Ledder开始到消费产品的多样化,包括Sucaryl,甜蜜素代糖。 1970年:FDA禁止销售的糖精。 1971:雅培公司被迫召回340万瓶输液。 1977年:公司形成合资企业与武田药品工业株式会社,日本称为TAP制药公司1985:雅培公司开发出第一个艾滋病诊断测试。 1987年:雅培的高特灵是由美国FDA批准用于治疗高血压。 1991:Clorithromycin,抗生素,引入。 1996年,为糖尿病患者的血液测试设备制造商雅培公司收购MediSense。 1999年:雅培同意收购ALZA公司为$ 730亿美元,但处理后倒塌;雅培同意支付1亿美元罚款有关的质量控制问题,其医疗检测试剂盒厂Perclose缝合厂商,公司被收购。 2000年:FDA批准的艾滋病药物Kaletra的;,雅培同意以$ 6.9亿美元的现金收购诺尔制药有限公司BASF AG的单位。

公司发展历程:

雅培公司是在美国历史最悠久和最成功的制药企业之一。虽然大约30%的年收入来自销售药品 - 包括雅培公司的旗舰药,抗生素Biaxin - 公司在该地区的营养品具有较高的知名度,其产品包括领先的婴幼儿配方奶粉品牌的S​​imilac和ISOMIL和领先的成人营养品牌保证。雅培也是一个顶级制造商,医疗诊断设备,血液分析仪,重点对感染和疾病的检测和监测。该公司的医院产品的单位生产电子和注射药物输送系统,静脉注射液和用品,麻醉药,产品在重症监护设置使用。雅培公司的年度研发预算金额超过100亿美元,与重点领域包括艾滋病/性抗病毒药物,抗感染,糖尿病,神经科学,肿瘤学,儿科药品,泌尿外科,血管医学。

早期的几十年

雅培公司从厨房的芝加哥医生名为华莱士卡尔文雅培运行在一个小的药品经营起源于19世纪后期。其他医生的时间,Abbott博士常用的处方吗啡,奎宁,士的宁和可待因 - 所有这些都是液体生物碱 - 他的病人。因为他们只能以液​​体形式存在,这些药物容易产生腐败变质,随着时间的推移,治疗减轻其有效性。 Abbott博士于1888年,听说比利时外科医生开发生物碱的固体形式。生物碱丸很快就成了在芝加哥可用,但Abbott博士与他们的质量不满意,他决定制造自己的。

Abbott博士于1891年开始宣传他的产品向其他医生。是如此成功,他的生意,他最终被卖股份给其他医生,并注册成立于1900年,他的操作雅培生物碱公司。到1905年,年销售额已增长至20万元。十年后,公司更名为雅培。第一次世界大战期间,雅培公司医学界至关重要,因为一些重要的药物,由德国公司独家生产的,在美国不再可用。雅培开发普鲁卡因,德国奴佛卡因的替代品,巴比妥,对veneral更换。

战争结束后,雅培公司继续专注于研究和开发新的药物。 1921年,公司建立了实验室在Rocky Mount,北卡罗莱纳州,该公司开发了一些新的药物,包括镇静剂,安眠药,维生素。即使Abbott博士去世后这一年,公司继续大量投资于新产品的研发和积极的市场营销活动。在1929年芝加哥证券交易所上市公司上市。两年后,雅培公司扩大在美国以外建立一个子公司在加拿大蒙特利尔的第一次。

德威特·克拉夫该公司于1933年被任命为总裁,结束了一段有些陈旧的公用领导。一个更有活力的性格比任何自Abbott博士,克拉夫是最好的怀念就职公司的杂志,什么新内容?该刊物工人的士气和舆论雅培的竞争对手,一些类似的出版物开始产生积极的影响。在1936年,雅培公司开始其长期与麻醉剂时,它推出钠硫喷妥钠,雅培科学家欧内斯特Volwiler和Donalee Tabern(他在1986年入选美国发明家名人堂这一发现)已经制定了。

二战期间,雅培公司再次在战场和医院的医疗保健中发挥了重要作用。到这个时候,美国雅培制药公司,如德国公司的依赖程度大大降低,尤其是IG法尔 - 一个聚集了世界上最先进的药品生产企业。战争结束后,许多IG法本公司的研究被移交给美国制造商。雅培,但是,有一点,从这些信息中获得,它已经是一个对自己有价值的竞争对手。

德威特·克拉夫在1945年离开后,雅培将其注意力抗生素的发展。本公司研制的抗生素类药物红霉素,其中,引入品牌下的红霉素和EES 1952年雅培公司的处方药销售的,构成了一个重要的部分 - 甚至几十年期满后,其17年的专利。急剧增加,当它被发现军团病是一种有效的治疗药物的销售。

雅培时无意中发现了一个利润丰厚的新产品之一,其研究人员意外地发现,他一直在努力的一种化学物质,有甜味。的化学品,环己基氨基磺酸,可以用来作为一种人造甜味剂。最初,它是从1950年,销售给糖尿病患者,但在20世纪60年代,美国人变得更加健康和饮食意识,它被越来越多地使用在各种各样的食品作为糖的替代品。

1964年,雅培完成了公司历史上的第一次重大收购,购买俄亥俄州哥伦布的M&R饮食实验室。 M&R的Similac婴儿配方奶粉的制造商,并在随后的几十年里,作为公司的罗斯产品部,形成了雅培市场领先的婴幼儿和成人营养品业务的基础。

20世纪60年代后期和20世纪70年代早期:多样化和危机

到1960年代中期,雅培已经几年没有研究的重大突破,并没有预计在不久的将来的任何时间。然后,爱德华J. Ledder于1967年,任命为公司总裁。他主张减少在雅培的重视对药品,由分散到其他领域。在随后的几年里,雅培推出了一系列消费产品,其中包括非乳制奶精Pream,高兴双手橡胶手套,无瑕的高尔夫球,Sucaryl,甜蜜素代糖。 Ledder放置在努力确保雅培的消费产品线的成功,梅尔文·伯恩鲍姆,一位经验丰富的经理,他能够挖角露华浓,分工负责。 Ledder多元化的政策,更加灵活的企业战略奠定了基础。不再完全暴露,雅培制药市场内能够交叉补贴经营不善,直到他们能改过自新。

尽管这种灵活性,雅培很快实现其增长的新的障碍。该公司的医院产品在一个有限的,机构的市场竞争。新药有更大的利润空间,但受到政府审批程序,保持公司等待了好几年,才可以推销他们的发现。另一方面,消费类产品,涉及更昂贵的营销所产生的利润比药品。无法增加利润没有很大的风险,雅培公司的管理到位的策略,决定维持。

甜蜜素销售增长显着,1969年,他们占雅培的消费产品收入 - 约5000万美元的三分之一。糖精成分的减肥食品的日益普及,然而,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)从他们的过度使用可能产生的副作用进行调查。 FDA的研究被广泛批评为“零碎”和“致命的缺陷”,但它仍然作为证据使用糖精致癌。市场崩溃时,1970年8月,FDA禁止国内销售的糖精。雅培,一夜之间遭受的损失,其最赚钱的业务之一,抗议的禁令,但无法扭转的决定。虽然该公司继续上访FDA,随后的研究证实,代谢的糖精可导致染色体断裂和膀胱癌。

不到一年后,被禁止糖精,雅培公司被迫召回3.4万瓶输液。用漆纸,人们发现,窝藏细菌称为GILSONITE,这些瓶子密封。污染被发现,只有当医务工作者注意到,然后调查已雅培的静脉注射液给药的患者感染的高发病率。疾病预防控制中心与污染的解决方案,至少434人感染,49人死亡。从$ 179万至300万美元的销售额下降,雅培公司的股价开始回落。雅培迅速移动取代其GILSONITE的合成橡胶密封,但该公司无法恢复其领导静脉市场。诉讼公司最终被控串谋恳求没有比赛,并支付1000美元的罚款。

20世纪70年代后期到80年代:强调研发,营养品,诊断设备

20世纪70年代初的危机,离开公司的高层的管理弱化和脆弱的批评。虽然爱德华Ledder被确认他的多样化的计划的成功(很大程度上免除他无法避免的甜蜜素禁止或输液危机),条件是由一个新的经理人才的表达明显成熟。罗伯特Schoellhorn,化工行业的老将,只是这样的经理。他的努力,在医院雅培产品部副总裁,导致该部门在1974年和1979年之间在收入增加了139%。他正确地预言,未来最赚钱的在医疗保健的趋势将走向成本效益分析和治疗。的Schoellhorn,其后晋升为公司总裁兼首席营运官。与此同时,在1977年订立的共同开发和comarketing的药品称为TAP制药公司武田药品工业株式会社,日本的一家合资企业,雅培。

雅培公司注册年销售额的增长率为15.5%和16.5%,由1979年的盈利增长率。这种扩张是由于财务分析师,该公司提高了生产率,降低了成本,扩展到国外市场,更多地参与医院营养品和诊断测试设备。该公司还推出了三类新药在1979年:Depakene,抗惊厥; Tranxene,温和的镇静剂;在肺部的血液凝块,治疗Abbokinase。所有这三个产品在20世纪70年代中期,公司在研究和发展方面的投资增加的直接结果。

利用其知识输液生产,维生素治疗,婴幼儿配方奶粉,雅培公司制定了全面加快恢复医院的病人的营养治疗方案,从而降低医疗成本。在20世纪80年代中,多达65%的所有医院的病人遭受某种形式的营养不良,所以雅培是非常成功的推销自己的程序。成人营养产品的另一个优势是,他们有一个地方在不断增长的家庭护理市场。

雅培也有类似的成功营销,其线条的诊断设备。由雅培开发的电子测试设备证明比手动程序更准确。为了加强其诊断技术的最终设备的研究,雅培公司聘请了两位高管远离德州仪器领导分工。

谁先进,于1979年,主席兼首席执行官罗伯特·Schoellhorn继续强调在20世纪80年代的中医药研究和发展的投资。于1982年推出七个新的药物在1985年占销售额的17%。海外业务也保持极其重要的雅培公司,而该公司在超过30个国家和地区有超过75个国外子公司和生产设施。的Schoellhorn继续支持Ledder原来的多元化政策。引入小鼠的眼部护理产品和Selsun蓝去屑洗发水有助于扩大国内消费的产品线,并承诺提供收入稳定,在经济低迷的情况下公司的任何其他市场。

也相信Schoellhorn与促进雅培的诊断设备,尤其是强调血液分析仪。这些设备被越来越多地用于检测合法和非法的物质在血液中。雅培领导潮流,开发的第一诊断为获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病),于1985年,和肝炎测试。该公司的“愿景”血液分析仪适合在桌面上,并在八分钟内执行90%的典型验血。到了80年代末,销售血液分析装置代表了10亿美元的业务,和医疗诊断产品($ 2.3亿美元每年)雅培的年销售额几乎占一半。同时,在药品领域,雅培于1987年获得FDA批准一种新的药物称为高特灵治疗高血压。高特灵于1993年被批准用于治疗的非癌性前列腺肿大。

被广泛赞誉为Schoellhorn雅培公司的惊人增长背后的驱动力在20世纪80年代 - 销量增长了近三倍,利润翻了一倍,制药公司从第197上升到第90,“财富”杂志世界500强企业名单上。领导者的积极管理风格,但是,往往导致冲突。在20世纪80年代,三位总统 - 詹姆斯·L·文森特(1981);柯克拉布(1985)和杰克·舒勒(1989) - 退出。 1989年12月,雅培公司的董事会,董事逼走Schoellhorn的,,反过来状告该公司对他的工作。雅培指责Schoellhorn的挪用公司资产和“欺诈行为”,并称前CEO行使股票期权价值930万元在几天内释放他。 Schoellhorn成功,由杜安L.副主席伯纳姆。

20世纪90年代和超越:新的药品介绍和收购

不像许多竞争对手(包括默克,史克必成公司,礼来公司),雅培没有获得毒品分销经理在20世纪90年代初。相反,该​​公司拨资金投入研发。 R&D经费在1982年的销售从5.2%上升到1994年的超过10%的销售额 - 由后者一年,R&D支出接近1亿美元。这一年标志着该公司连续第23个盈利升力和帮助雅培公司的股票持有其价值优于大多数竞争对手的医疗环境不明朗,20世纪90年代初。

在20世纪90年代初的关键发展是在1991年开发作为雅培的红霉素的继任者,抗生素clorithromycin引进。在美国市场上销售的名义下Biaxin,clorithromycin是有用的治疗常见的上呼吸道的疾病,如流感,以及其他类型的感染。它迅速成为雅培的旗舰药品 - 最终实现1亿美元的年销售额 - 余下所以到21世纪初。

推出新产品,持续十年的中间几年。在1994年,雅培推出七氟烷吸入麻醉剂,很快得到普及,因为其广泛的用途。次年,与武田化学,丝锥,合资公司获得FDA批准用于兰索拉,溃疡的治疗(兰索拉唑的销售额达1.3亿元,到1998年)。在1996年,FDA批准授予NORVIR,一种蛋白酶抑制剂,用于治疗艾滋病毒和艾滋病。

尽管这些研发成功,雅培公司的盈利没有,他们曾在20世纪80年代的高 - 双 - 两位数的速度增加,以及公司,开始面对正在狼吞虎咽地吃起来一个更大的对手在迅速巩固的医疗保健的风险20世纪90年代的产业。 20世纪90年代初摆脱保守的管理,雅培移动积极在第二个十年的后五年,通过收购扩张,从而避开被收购本身。在1996年,雅培带动$ 867亿美元收购的公司,一个MediSense基于马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆,为糖尿病患者的血液测试设备制造商,其诊断部门通过。这是该公司的第一大问题,因为在1964年收购M&R饮食实验室。雅培在1997年花了约200万元,对某些静脉赛诺菲制药公司的产品线,包括美国法国赛诺菲SA单位在这笔交易中,注射的药物输送系统的基础上预装,单剂量注射器Carpujet。此外,在1997年,雅培遭遇一个潜在的挫折,,武田药品时没有续签为期十年的合同,给了雅培的优先选择的权利武田的新药在美国分发通过TAP企业的。武田决定设立了自己的销售和营销机构在美国。通过这段时间的TAP产生年销售额超过$ 2亿美元,主要从营销兰索拉唑,醋酸亮丙瑞林,前列腺癌的药物。

到1997年,雅培公司增加了一倍的销售额和利润,因为伯纳姆接替了被推翻的Schoellhorn。早在1998年,伯纳姆宣布,他将在1999年退休。在这一年年初,万里D.白,谁曾负责诊断部的高级副总裁,接任CEO。后来在1999年,白被任命为董事长。在领导的过渡期在1998年,雅培收购默克斯科技公司的诊断产品制造商,为$ 234万美元。在1999年,雅培增长的胃口成倍增加的公布在6月的交易为$ 7.3亿美元的股票收购ALZA公司。 ALZA公司是一家领先的先进药物输送系统生产商,并正在开发新药有一个坚实的管道。然而,美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)提出了合并的反垄断担忧,当双方无法与FTC达成一项协议,他们呼吁在12月合并。在交易崩溃的另一个可能因素是雅培公司的股价下滑后,该公司的协议,在11月到拉125种医疗诊断测试套件关闭美国市场,并支付给美国政府一个亿美元民事处罚。自1993年以来,FDA已发出警告,以雅培检测试剂盒厂质量控制方面的不足之处,市场退出和缴付罚款,这个过程的结果。 FDA还列举了生产控制不佳的原因,其在1999年年初停止销售雅培的血块溶解剂Abbokinase。

与此同时,雅培于1999年完成两个较小规模的收购。 Perclose公司,一个用于关闭动脉在血管成形术的缝合线制造商,为约600万美元的股票收购。雅培还葛兰素威康公司支付2.17亿美元现金五麻醉产品。雅培在2000年1月出售其农产品经营有限公司雅培住友化学株式会社,现在是几十年来第一次在一个纯粹的医疗保健公司。雅培在那年4月开始销售BIAXIN XL的旗舰Biaxin抗生素,每日一次新配方。美国食品和药物管理局在2000年9月授予加急批准,由雅培开发的第二代艾滋病药物Kaletra的。 Kaletra的有潜力的反超前,辉瑞公司的艾滋病药物奈非那韦,因为它的副作用较少。它也出现了,病人没有产生耐药性Kaletra的,随着时间的推移,如发生与大多数其他艾滋病药物,包括奈非那韦。 2000年12月雅培推出一项重大收购时达成一项协议,以$ 6.9亿美元的现金收购诺尔制药有限公司,德国化工巨头巴斯夫公司为单位的另一次尝试。再次,雅培公司的宗旨是,以加强其产品线,和诺尔至少一个潜在的重磅炸弹药物称为D2E7,实验治疗类风湿关节炎。 Knoll的现有产品,减肥药Meridia的年销售额约400万元,而甲状腺素,1.5亿美元的甲状腺药物。收购也将提高雅培制药近1亿美元的研发预算。

主要子公司:雅培公司化工厂;雅培发酵产品DE波多黎各雅培保健品,纽约,雅培主页输液服务;雅培国际有限公司;波多黎各雅培国际有限公司雅培公司雅培制药国际有限公司,雅培制药泰富有限公司,雅培制药(波多黎各)注册成立;雅培住宅发展基金公司,雅培制药服务公司,雅培公司,雅培通用有限公司; AC合并附属公司;公司CMM运输;企业联盟,公司IMTC技术公司;默克斯诊断,北岸物业公司; Oximetrix波多黎各,Perclose公司Solartek产品公司;索伦森研究有限公司,公司,天鹅时美施贵宝,注册成立; TAP财经公司; TOBAL产品纳入其中;雅培阿根廷,SA;雅培,大洋洲Pty.有限公司(澳大利亚); MediSense澳洲雅培有限公司GESELLSCHAFT MBH (奥地利);雅培医院有限公司(巴哈马);默克斯诊断国际公司(巴巴多斯);雅培,SA(比利时);雅培LABORATORIOS巴西公司。 (巴西);雅培制药有限公司(加拿大);国际默克斯技术公司(加拿大);雅培智利LIMITADA(智利);雅培哥伦比亚,SA;雅培SRO (捷克共和国);默克斯Diagnostica公司,SPOL。 s.r.o. (捷克共和国);雅培制药A / S(丹麦);默克斯诊断A / S(丹麦);雅培LABORATORIOS厄瓜多尔,SA;雅培,SA de CV公司(萨尔瓦多);雅培OY(芬兰);雅培法国SA分析仪SA奥尔西恩;法国SARL MediSense;默克斯诊断(法国)SA;雅培公司(德国);雅培诊断公司(德国);默克斯Diagnostica公司GMBH(德国);雅培(HELLAS)SA(希腊);雅培LABORATORIOS SA(危地马拉),雅培制药有限公司(香港),雅培制药(匈牙利)有限公司,雅培制药(印度)有限公司(51%); Abind医疗保健私人有限公司(印度),PT雅培印度尼西亚(97%),雅培,爱尔兰有限公司;雅培爱尔兰有限公司;雅培SPA(意大利);默克斯Diagnostici SPA(意大利);雅培日本KK (日本); Dainabot有限公司有限公司(日本73%);雅培韩国有限公司,雅培中东SARL (黎巴嫩),雅培公司(马来西亚)私人有限公司。 Bhd的雅培墨西哥,SA de CV公司,雅培公司(莫桑比克)LIMITADA Edisco BV(荷兰);雅培BV(荷兰);雅培BV(荷兰);雅培财经BV(荷兰);雅培控股BV(荷兰); MediSense欧洲BV(荷兰); MediSense荷兰,法国BV IMTC控股BV(荷兰); IMTC财经BV(荷兰);默克斯诊断比荷卢BV(荷兰),雅培公司(新西兰)有限公司(新西兰);雅培Norge的AS (挪威);雅培实验室(巴基斯坦)有限公司(83.42%);雅培,CA雅培海外(巴拿马),SA(巴拿马);雅培LABORATORIOS SA(秘鲁);:雅培(菲律宾);雅培SP。 z.o.o. (波兰);雅培LABORATORIOS LIMITADA(葡萄牙);雅培公司(新加坡)私人有限公司;雅培南非(Pty.)有限公司,雅培公司,SA(西班牙);雅培CIENTIFICA,SA(西班牙);雅培斯堪的纳维亚AB雅培AG(瑞士);雅培SA(瑞士);雅培财务公司SA(瑞士);雅培台湾有限公司,雅培制药有限公司(泰国);雅培Laboratuarlari Ithalat Ihracat VE Tecaret有限公司Sirketi(土耳其);雅培(瑞典);投资有限公司(英国),雅培制药有限公司(英国);雅培(英国)控股有限公司,雅培受托人有限公司(英国); IMTC(英国)控股有限公司; MediSense英国有限公司(英国); MediSense英国有限公司;默克斯生物科技有限公司(英国);专家Diagnostica公司有限公司(英国);乌拉圭LIMITADA雅培,雅培,CA (委内瑞拉); Medicamentos M&R,SA(委内瑞拉)。

主要分部:医药产品,罗斯产品;医院产品;雅培国际;诊断;特色产品。

主要竞争对手:默克制药公司,礼来公司,辉瑞公司,施贵宝公司,美国家用产品公司,强生(Johnson&Johnson),阿斯利康,安万特,拜耳,葛兰素史克,先灵葆雅公司诺华,罗氏控股有限公司

更多阅读:

雅培:得益于产品降低成本,“商业周刊”,1984年6月18日,第56页+。
婴儿奶瓶战斗中,“福布斯1988年11月28日,第222页+。
巴雷特,艾米,理查德·A. Melcher先生,“制药公司,你医治自己吧”,“商业周刊”,1999年10月11日,第88 +。
贝努瓦,艾伦,“雅培:房间的顶部,”金融世界,10月17日,1989年,页。 28。
Berss,玛西娅,'超然,但没有睡着,“福布斯”,8月29日,1994年,第43-44页。
布莱贝格,罗伯特·雅培和科斯特洛:禁止糖精喜剧 - 悲剧 - 错误“,”巴伦周刊“10月9日,1978年,页。 7。
'鲍勃Schoellhorn是拒绝悄悄地走了,“商业周刊”1990年3月26日,第34 +。
,托马斯M.伯顿,“雅培公司和Alza公司取消他们的交易,”华尔街日报12月17日,1999年,第。 B10。
------“雅培购买巴斯夫单位为69亿美元,”华尔街日报“,2000年12月15日,第A3,A12。
------'雅培的白衣胜CEO职位,“华尔街日报”9月16日,1998年,页。 A3。
------雅培支付$ 100万元罚款,以美国“华尔街日报”11月3日,1999年,p。 A3。
------联邦法官清除雅培方程式案例:`可疑,投标过程被称为婴幼儿食品“,但监督是有故障的,”华尔街日报6月1日,1994年,第。 A3。
卡特,金,雅培投注及其未来在新产品开发,现代医疗保健1986年11月7日,第138页+。
萨拉·克莱因,A.,“雅培的生物技术商业获取一个助推器射击:捡钥匙巴斯夫新政在国家的最先进的实验室,”克雷恩芝加哥商业1月1日,2001年,页。 4。
------“进货的产品管道振兴雅培克雷恩芝加哥商业9月4日,2000年,第。 4。
高根,赫尔曼,长长的白线:雅培,纽约:兰登书屋,1963年,项309 p的故事。
梅林,保罗,“雀巢苏尔雅培婴儿配方奶粉,”克雷恩芝加哥商业1988年6月13日。
米勒,詹姆斯P.,“雅培同意购买Alza公司,”华尔街日报“6月22日,1999年,页。 A3。
------'雅培的淘汰Schoellhorn作为主席,四面楚歌的官方绘图诉讼,“华尔街日报”1990年3月12日,第B6。
俄罗洛索,阿塞尼奥,小,雅培迟缓的药物常用的处方不负有心人“,10月21日,1991年,第克雷恩芝加哥商业。 3。
------“雅培的强硬RX:购买”购买“或”风险“,”克雷恩芝加哥商业,3月2日,1998年,页。 3。
------雅培尝试昂贵的生长药物:M&A“,4月8日,1996年,第克雷恩芝加哥商业。 4。
------新CEO蓄势牧师最多困了雅培的战略,“克雷恩芝加哥商业9月21日,1998年,第。 4。
Salwan,凯文G.,“婴幼儿配方企业七拼八凑投标,美国说,”华尔街日报1992年6月12日,第。 A3。
的米拉,Somasundaram,'雅培设置股票药品柜:制药巨头预计中型对手,“2月1日,1999年,克雷恩芝加哥商业店铺。 1。


资料来源:公司历史,国际指南。 40。圣雅各福群出版社,2001。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:47:59 | 显示全部楼层
Telling the Story of Biotechnology

Life Sciences Foundation Formed to Help People Understand Why Biotech History Matters

Donna Lock


Biotechnologists are in the tomorrow business. They strive to innovate, invent, and make progress. They must; survival depends on it. Biotechnologists are future-oriented.

Yet, biotechnologists are also steeped in history. They swim in the past and strive constantly to remember it. They must; survival depends on it. Biotechnologists are history-oriented.

Dubious? Consider this. In order to innovate, bench scientists must review technical literatures—histories of discoveries. In order to protect intellectual properties, patent attorneys must reconstruct and document histories of inventions. In order to secure funding, manage crises, and devise effective strategies for the success of life science companies, biotech executives must draw on business lessons, skills, reputations, and networks of relationships acquired over time. History matters crucially to these people.

In order to understand the present of the biotech industry and to plan for its future, participants are obliged to consider its past. The same is true for the general public, the press, and policy-makers. People can’t make good decisions about biotechnology if they don’t know its history.

The Mission of LSF

The Life Sciences Foundation (LSF) has been established to help people understand. LSF documents, preserves, and disseminates the history of the field—it tells the biotech story. The nonprofit charity is headquartered in San Francisco. Regional chapters are in formation in Boston, San Diego, and other key centers of biotech research and development.

The story of biotechnology is being told through website resources, oral histories with biotech pioneers, archive collections, educational outreach, and a book on the origins of the field.

Industry leaders have recognized the pertinence and value of the project. Founding partners in LSF include Burrill & Company, Celgene, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech, Genzyme, Merck, Millennium, Pfizer, Quintiles, and Thermo Fisher. Serving on the organization’s executive board are G. Steven Burrill, CEO of Burrill & Company; Joshua Boger, former chairman and CEO of Vertex Pharmaceuticals; Dennis Gillings, chairman and CEO of Quintiles; John Lechleiter, chairman and CEO of Eli Lilly & Co.; Henri Termeer, former chairman and CEO of Genzyme; and Arnold Thackray, LSF president and CEO. Phillip Sharp, institute professor at MIT, serves as the organization’s academic advisor.

Making History

LSF operates on the premise that history is a cultural force—but only if preserved and published. It is an asset that must be deployed. So far, the biotech industry has not made good use of it. “See for yourself,” says Arnold Thackray, LSF president and CEO, “Google ‘history of biotechnology.’ The results are fragmented, uneven, and rather paltry.” Thackray also points out, “If you don’t write your own history, somebody else will do it for you, and they may be hostile.”

LSF advisory board co-chair Joshua Boger echoes these sentiments: “Biotechnology is one of the most important drivers of progress in our time, but people generally don’t know us. They know little about what we do. They don’t know the stories. We’re looking at huge deficits in public understanding.”

Bits and pieces of the biotech story have surfaced, and some are captivating—The Billion Dollar Molecule by Barry Werth, a book about Boger’s company, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, is a fine example. But due to an overall paucity of popularizing accounts, the science remains imposing to lay audiences, and those who have made important contributions to the field remain mostly anonymous.

Informing the Public

LSF is trying to help biotechnology enhance its public profile. Mark Jones, the foundation’s director of research, believes the life sciences have been neglected: “Ask people on the street who was responsible for their iPhone or iPad. They’ll tell you. Millions rushed to bookstores to purchase the Steve Jobs biography. Jobs was a fascinating character, and Apple makes wonderful products, but life scientists are trying to save lives, feed the world, and solve our pressing energy problems. There is plenty of compelling drama in biotech. We intend to put it on exhibition.”

Jones explains that a big part of LSF’s mission is to “humanize” the biosciences. LSF intends to tell tales about people—scientists, inventors, entrepreneurs, managers, executives, and financiers—the men and women who work to advance scientific knowledge, generate technological innovations, secure material prosperity, and improve lives around the world.

These stories are full of color. They take place in laboratories and clinics, universities and research parks, pharmaceutical factories and chemical refineries, boardrooms and executive suites; on Sand Hill Road, Wall Street, Capitol Hill, and at the FDA; in the corn fields of Iowa, rice paddies in Asia, and African yam gardens; in the Gulf of Mexico, where genetically engineered microbes are cleaning up an oil spill, and the world’s oceans, where vast reserves of biodiversity are being mined for valuable goods. Biotech stories are set wherever processes of life have been used to transform and enhance the human condition.

Arnold Thackray emphasizes that the message is for students, teachers, scholars, journalists, and policymakers. “There is a valuable heritage here. The life sciences will shape the course of the 21st century. We need to preserve their history. We need to teach young people about the world in which they live.”

According to Thackray, the task is urgent; the biotech industry is still young, but the founding generation is already passing away: “Records are being scattered, memories are fading, stories are disappearing. Once lost, they’re gone forever.”

How You Can Help LSF to Achieve Its Mission

You will enable LSF to record history and increase public understanding of science and technology by:

Spreading the word that it is time to capture the rich heritage of biotechnology,
Contacting the foundation with information on archives, historical records, and ancillary publications,
Suggesting candidates for the foundation’s oral history initiative (or developing a memoir of your own).
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:49:08 | 显示全部楼层
生命科学基金会成立,以帮助人们了解为什么生物历史事项

唐娜锁


生物技术是在明天的业务。他们努力创新,发明,并取得进展。他们必须依赖于它的生存。生物技术是面向未来的。

然而,生物技术也历史悠久。他们游过去,并不断努力记住它。他们必须依赖于它的生存。生物技术是面向历史。

可疑的吗?考虑这一点。以创新,板凳科学家必须检讨技术文献的历史发现。为了保护知识产权,专利律师必须重建和记录的历史发明。为了获得资金,管理危机,并制定有效的战略,成功的生命科学公司,生物技术人员必须利用业务的经验教训,技能,声誉,和网络的关系随着时间的推移收购。历史重要关键的是这些人。

为了了解目前的生物技术产业,其未来计划,参与者必须要考虑它的过去。一般公众,媒体,决策者也同样如此。人们不能做出正确的决定,关于生物技术,如果他们不知道它的历史。

LSF的使命

生命科学基金会(LSF)已成立,以帮助人们了解。 LSF文件,蜜饯,传播的历史现场告诉生物的故事。非营利,慈善机构,总部设在旧金山。在波士顿,圣迭戈和其他关键生物技术的研究和发展中心的形成区域章节。

生物技术的故事被告知通过网站资源,口述历史与生物技术的先驱,归档收藏,教育宣传,和一本书的起源领域。

行业领导者已经认识到该项目的针对性和价值。创始合伙人包括在LSF的Burrill&公司,Celgene公司,礼来公司,Genentech公司,Genzyme公司,默克公司,千禧年,辉瑞公司,昆泰公司,赛默飞世尔。任职于该组织的执行董事会的Burrill公司的首席执行官G.史蒂芬的Burrill约书亚表征Boger前Vertex制药公司董事长兼首席执行官;昆泰公司的董事长兼首席执行官丹尼斯·吉林斯;约翰勒什莱泰,董事长兼首席执行官,礼来公司,Genzyme公司前董事长兼首席执行官亨利·特默和阿诺德·撒克里,LSF总裁兼首席执行官。菲利普夏普,在麻省理工学院教授,​​作为该组织的学术顾问。

创造历史

LSF工作的前提是,历史是一种文化的力量,但只有保存和发布。这是一个资产必须部署。到目前为止,生物技术产业已不好好利用它。 ,“谷歌的历史,生物技术,LSF总裁兼首席执行官阿诺德·撒克里说:”自己看看,结果是零散,参差不齐,相当微不足道的。“撒克里也指出,”如果你不写自己的历史别人为你做,他们可能是敌对的。“

LSF顾问委员会联合主席约书亚表征Boger这些观点相呼应:“生物技术是时代进步的最重要的驱动力之一,但一般人不认识我们。他们知道什么我们做什么。他们不知道的故事。我们正在寻找在公众的理解的巨额赤字。“

星星点点生物技术的故事逐渐浮现,有些是迷人十亿美元的分子表征Boger的,Vertex制药公司,一本书,由巴里·韦斯是一个很好的例子。但由于整体缺乏普及账户,科学仍然气势奠定观众,以及这些领域作出了重要贡献仍然大多是匿名。

通知公众

LSF是试图帮助生物技术提升其公众形象。被忽视生命科学基础研究室主任,马克·琼斯,认为:“问的人在大街上谁是负责他们的iPhone或iPad。他们会告诉你。数以百万计赶到书店购买史蒂夫·乔布斯的传记。乔布斯是一个迷人的性格,也使得苹果公司美好的产品,但生命科学家正在试图挽救生命,养活世界,解决紧迫的能源问题。有很多引人注目的戏剧生物技术。我们打​​算把它放在展览。“

琼斯解释说,很大一部分LSF的使命是要“人性化”的生物科学。 LSF有意搬弄是非关于人的科学家,发明家,企业家,经理,高管和金融家的男人和妇女工作,推进科学知识的人,产生的技术创新,安全的物质繁荣,提高生活在世界各地。

这些故事充满了色彩。他们采取在实验室和诊所,高校和科研园区,药厂,化工炼油厂,会议室和行政套房;沙山道,华尔街,国会山,并在FDA在爱荷华州的玉米田,稻田亚洲和非洲山药花园,在墨西哥湾,遗传工程微生物清理漏油,和世界上的海洋,储量丰富的生物多样性正在开采的贵重物品。生物故事的生命过程的地方已被用于改造和提高人的境况。

阿诺德的沙克雷强调该消息是为学生,教师,学者,记者和决策者。 “这里是一个宝贵的遗产。生命科学将塑造21世纪的过程中。我们需要保护他们的历史。我们要教年轻人了解他们生活于其中的世界。“

据撒克里,任务是紧迫的;生物技术产业还很年轻,但奠基的一代已经逝去:“记录是被分散,记忆褪色,故事正在消失。一旦丢失,他们已经一去不复返了。“

您如何帮助LSF实现其使命

您将启用LSF,记录历史,并增加公众理解科学和技术:

传播这个词,它是及时捕捉到生物技术的丰富遗产,
联系档案馆,历史记录,并配套刊物的基础信息,
建议考生口述历史为基础的主动(或发展自己的回忆录)。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2013-8-16 08:49:10 | 显示全部楼层
了解一下。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:49:26 | 显示全部楼层
强生公司创办发展史

Company Perspectives:

Our Credo: We believe our first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses and patients, to mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services. In meeting their needs everything we do must be of high quality. We must constantly strive to reduce our costs in order to maintain reasonable prices. Customers' orders must be serviced promptly and accurately. Our suppliers and distributors must have an opportunity to make a fair profit. We are responsible to our employees, the men and women who work with us throughout the world. Everyone must be considered as an individual. We must respect their dignity and recognize their merit. They must have a sense of security in their jobs. Compensation must be fair and adequate, and working conditions clean, orderly and safe. We must be mindful of ways to help our employees fulfill their family responsibilities. Employees must feel free to make suggestions and complaints. There must be equal opportunity for employment, development and advancement for those qualified. We must provide competent management, and their actions must be just and ethical. We are responsible to the communities in which we live and work and to the world community as well. We must be good citizens--support good works and charities and bear our fair share of taxes. We must encourage civic improvements and better health and education. We must maintain in good order the property we are privileged to use, protecting the environment and natural resources. Our final responsibility is to our stockholders. Business must make a sound profit. We must experiment with new ideas. Research must be carried on, innovative programs developed and mistakes paid for. New equipment must be purchased, new facilities provided and new products launched. Reserves must be created to provide for adverse times. When we operate according to these principles, the stockholders should realize a fair return. Key Dates:

Key Dates:

1886:Johnson brothers begin producing dressings in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
1887:Company is incorporated as Johnson & Johnson.
1893:Johnson's Baby Powder is introduced.
1921:BandAid brand adhesive bandages make their debut.
1924:Overseas expansion begins with the establishment of Johnson & Johnson Limited in the United Kingdom.
1932:Robert Johnson, known as 'the General,' takes over leadership as president.
1943:Johnson writes the company credo.
1944:Company goes public on the New York Stock Exchange.
1959:McNeil Laboratories, Inc. (McNeil Labs) is acquired.
1960:McNeil Labs introduces Tylenol as an over-the-counter (OTC) pain reliever.
1961:Janssen Pharmaceutica is acquired.
1975:Through a significant price decrease, Tylenol is transformed into a mass-marketed product.
1982:Tylenol tampering tragedy occurs.
1988:Acuvue disposable contact lenses are introduced.
1989:J & J and Merck form joint venture to develop OTC versions of Merck's prescription medications.
1994:Neutrogena Corporation is acquired.
1995:Merck and J & J launch Pepcid AC; company acquires the clinical diagnostics unit of Eastman Kodak Company. 1996:J & J acquires Cordis Corporation. 1998ePuy, Inc. is acquired, and a companywide restructuring is launched. 1999:Centocor, Inc. merges with J & J.

Company History:

One of America's most admired companies, Johnson & Johnson (J & J) is one of the largest healthcare firms in the world and one of the most diversified. Its operations are organized into three business segments: pharmaceutical, which generates 39 percent of revenues and 61 percent of operating income; professional, which accounts for 36 percent of revenues and 27 percent of operating income; and consumer, which contributes 25 percent of revenues and 12 percent of operating income. J & J's pharmaceutical products--which are sold under such brands as Janssen Pharmaceutica, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, and Centocor--include drugs for family planning, mental illness, gastroenterology, oncology, pain management, and other areas. The professional segment includes surgical and patient care equipment and devices, diagnostic products, joint replacements, and disposable contact lenses. The company's well-known line of consumer products includes the Johnson's baby care line, the Neutrogena skin and hair care line, Tylenol and Motrin pain relievers, o.b. and Stayfree feminine hygiene products, the Reach oral care line, Band-Aid brand adhesive bandages, Imodium A-D diarrhea treatment, Mylanta gastrointestinal products, and Pepcid AC acid controller. J & J generates about half of its revenues outside the United States, through its network of 190 operating companies in 51 countries and its marketing organization that sells in more than 175 countries.

Early History: From Surgical Dressings to Baby Cream

J & J traces its beginnings to the late 1800s, when Joseph Lister's discovery that airborne germs were a source of infection in operating rooms sparked the imagination of Robert Wood Johnson, a New England druggist. Johnson joined forces with his brothers, James Wood Johnson and Edward Mead Johnson, and the three began producing dressings in 1886 in New Brunswick, New Jersey, with 14 employees in a former wallpaper factory.

Because Lister's recommended method for sterilization--spraying the operating room with carbolic acid--was found to be impractical and cumbersome, Johnson & Johnson (which was incorporated in 1887) found a ready market for its product. The percentage of deaths due to infections following surgery was quite high and hospitals were eager to find a solution.

J & J's first product was an improved medicinal plaster that used medical compounds mixed in an adhesive. Soon afterward, the company designed a soft, absorbent cotton-and-gauze dressing, and Robert Wood Johnson's dream was realized. Mass production began and the dressings were shipped in large quantities throughout the United States. By 1890 J & J was using dry heat to sterilize the bandages.

The establishment of a bacteriological laboratory in 1891 gave research a boost, and by the following year the company had met accepted requirements for a sterile product. By introducing dry heat, steam, and pressure throughout the manufacturing process, J & J was able to guarantee the sterility of its bandages. The adhesive bandage was further improved in 1899 when, with the cooperation of surgeons, J & J introduced a zinc oxide-based adhesive plaster that was stronger and overcame much of the problem of the skin irritation that plagued many patients. J & J's fourth original design was an improved method for sterilizing catgut sutures.

From the beginning, J & J was an advocate of antiseptic surgical procedures. In 1888 the company published Modern Methods of Antiseptic Wound Treatment, a text used by physicians for many years. That same year, Fred B. Kilmer began his 45-year stint as scientific director at J & J. A well-known science and medicine writer, and father of poet Joyce Kilmer, Fred Kilmer wrote influential articles for J & J's publications, including Red Cross Notes and the Red Cross Messenger. Physicians, pharmacists, and the general public were encouraged to use antiseptic methods, and J & J products were promoted.

R.W. Johnson died in 1910 and was succeeded as chairman by his brother James. It was then that the company began to grow quickly. To guarantee a source for the company's increasing need for textile materials, J & J purchased Chicopee Manufacturing Corporation in 1916. The first international affiliate was founded in Canada in 1919. A few years later, in 1923, Robert W. Johnson's sons, Robert Johnson and J. Seward Johnson, took an around-the-world tour that convinced them that J & J should expand overseas, and Johnson & Johnson Limited was established in Great Britain a year later. Diversification continued with the introduction in 1921 of Band-Aid brand adhesive bandages and Johnson's Baby Cream (Johnson's Baby Powder had debuted in 1893) and the debut of the company's first feminine hygiene product, Modess sanitary napkins, in 1927.

1932--63: The General at the Helm

The younger Robert Johnson, who came to be known as 'the General,' had joined the company as a mill hand while still in his teens. By the age of 25 he had become a vice-president, and he was elected president in 1932. Described as dynamic and restless with a keen sense of duty, Johnson had attained the rank of brigadier general in World War II and served as vice-chairman of the War Production Board.

The General firmly believed in decentralization in business; he was the driving force behind J & J's organizational structure, in which divisions and affiliates were given autonomy to direct their own operations. This policy coincided with a move into pharmaceuticals, hygiene products, and textiles. During Robert Johnson's tenure, the division for the manufacture of surgical packs and gowns became Surgikos, Inc.; the department for sanitary napkin production was initially called the Modess division and then became the Personal Products Company; birth control products were under the supervision of the Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation; and the separate division for suture business became Ethicon, Inc. Under the General's leadership, annual sales grew from $11 million to $700 million at the time of his death in 1968.

Following his father's lead as a champion of social issues, Johnson spoke out in favor of raising the minimum wage, improving conditions in factories, and emphasizing business's responsibility to society. Johnson called for management to treat workers with respect and to create programs that would improve workers' skills and better prepare them for success in a modern industrial society. In 1943 Johnson wrote a credo outlining the company's four areas of social responsibility: first to its customers; second to its employees; third to the community and environment; and fourth to the stockholders. On the heels of the credo came the company's change from family-owned firm to public company, as J & J was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1944.

In 1959 J & J acquired McNeil Laboratories, Inc., maker of a non-aspirin (acetaminophen) pain reliever called Tylenol--which was at that time available only by prescription. Just one year after the acquisition, McNeil launched Tylenol as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication. Also in 1959, Cilag-Chemie, a Swiss pharmaceutical firm, was purchased, followed in two years by the purchase of Janssen Pharmaceutica, maker of the major antipsychotic drug Haldol, which had been introduced in 1958.

In 1963 Johnson retired. Although he remained active in the business, chairmanship of the company went outside the family for the first time. Johnson's immediate successor was Philip Hofmann, who, much like the General, had started as a shipping clerk and worked his way up the ladder. During Hofmann's ten-year term as chairman, J & J's domestic and overseas affiliates flourished. Hofmann was another firm believer in decentralization and encouraged the training of local experts to supervise operations in their respective countries. Foreign management was organized along product lines rather than geographically, with plant managers reporting to a person with expertise in the field.

1960s--70s: Increased Promotion of Consumer Products

In the early 1960s federal regulation of the healthcare industry was increasing. When James Burke--who had come to J & J from the marketing department of the Procter & Gamble Company--became president of J & J's Domestic Operating Company in 1966, the company was looking for ways to increase profits from its consumer products to offset possible slowdowns in the professional products divisions. By luring top marketing people from Procter & Gamble, Burke was able to put together several highly successful advertising campaigns. The first introduced Carefree and Stayfree sanitary napkins into a market that was dominated by the acknowledged feminine products leader, Kimberly-Clark. Usually limited to women's magazines, advertisements for feminine hygiene products were low-key and discreet. Under Burke's direction, J & J took a more open approach and advertised Carefree and Stayfree on television. By 1978 J & J had captured half of the market. Meantime, the company expanded its feminine hygiene line through the 1973 acquisition of the German firm Dr. Carl Hahn G.m.b.H., maker of the o.b. brand of tampons.

One of Burke's biggest challenges was Tylenol. Ever since J & J had acquired McNeil Laboratories, maker of Tylenol, the drug had been marketed as a high-priced product. Burke saw other possibilities, and in 1975 he got the chance he was waiting for. Bristol-Myers Company introduced Datril and advertised that it had the same ingredients as Tylenol but was available at a significantly lower price. Burke convinced J & J Chairman Richard Sellars that they should meet this competition head on by dropping Tylenol's price to meet Datril's. With Sellars's approval, Burke took Tylenol into the mass-marketing arena, slashed its price, and ended up beating not only Datril, but number one Anacin as well. This signaled the beginning of an ongoing battle between American Home Products Corporation, maker of Anacin, and McNeil Laboratories.

Sellars, Hofmann's prot茅g茅, had become chairman in 1973, and served in that position for three years. Burke succeeded Sellars in 1976 as CEO and chairman of the board, and David R. Clare was appointed president. J & J had always maintained a balance between the many divisions in its operations, particularly between mass consumer products and specialized professional products. No single J & J product accounted for as much as five percent of the company's total sales. With Burke at the helm, consumer products began to be promoted aggressively, and Tylenol pain reliever became J & J's number one seller.

At the same time, Burke did not turn his back on the company's position as a leader in professional healthcare products. In May 1977 Extracorporeal Medical Specialties, a manufacturer of kidney dialysis and intravenous treatment products, became part of the corporation. Three years later, J & J acquired Iolab Corporation, maker of ocular lenses for cataract surgery, and effectively entered the field of eye care and ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. In 1981 the company extended its involvement in eye care through the acquisition of Frontier Contact Lenses. The increased in-house development of critical care products resulted in the creation of Critikon, Inc., in 1979, and in 1983 Johnson & Johnson Hospital Services was created to develop and implement corporate marketing programs.

1980s Tylenol Tampering Tragedy

In September 1982 tragedy struck J & J when seven people died from ingesting Tylenol capsules that had been laced with cyanide. Advertising was canceled immediately, and J & J recalled all Tylenol products from store shelves. After the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found that the tampering had been done at the retail level rather than during manufacturing, J & J was left with the problem of how to save its number one product and its reputation. In the week after the deaths, J & J's stock dropped 18 percent and its prime competitors' products, Datril and Anacin-3, were in such demand that supplies were back-ordered.

J & J was able to recoup its losses through several marketing strategies. The company ran a one-time ad that explained how to exchange Tylenol capsules for tablets or refunds and worked closely with the press, responding directly to reporters' questions as a means of keeping the public up to date. The company also placed a coupon for $2.50 off any Tylenol product in newspapers across the country to reimburse consumers for Tylenol capsules they may have discarded during the tampering incident and offer an incentive to purchase Tylenol in other forms.

Within weeks of the poisoning incidents, the FDA issued guidelines for tamper-resistant packaging for the entire food and drug industry. To bolster public confidence in its product, J & J used three layers of protection, two more than recommended, when Tylenol was put back on store shelves. Within months of the cyanide poisoning, J & J was gaining back its share of the pain-reliever market, and soon regained more than 90 percent of its former customers. By 1989 Tylenol sales were $500 million annually, and in 1990 the line was expanded into the burgeoning cold remedy market with several Tylenol Cold products; the following year saw the launch of Tylenol P.M., a sleep aid. James Burke's savvy, yet honest, handling of the Tylenol tampering incident earned him a spot in the National Business Hall of Fame, an honor awarded in 1990. Litigation over the incident was finally resolved in 1991, almost a decade after the initial tampering. McNeil Labs settled with over 30 survivors of the poisonings for more than $35 million.

In 1989 Bristol-Myers launched an aggressive advertising campaign that positioned its Nuprin brand ibuprofen pain reliever in direct competition with Tylenol. The move compounded market share erosion from American Home Products' Advil ibuprofen. Both products claimed to work better than Tylenol's acetaminophen formulation.

There were a number of other important developments in the second half of the 1980s. In 1986 J & J acquired LifeScan, Inc., maker of at-home blood-monitoring products for diabetics. That same year, the company expanded its world leading position in baby care products through the acquisition of Penaten G.m.b.H., the market leader in Germany. Following the acquisition of Frontier Contact Lenses, which was renamed Vistakon, J & J introduced the Acuvue brand of disposable contact lenses in the United States in 1988. The popularity of the Acuvue lenses helped propel Vistakon into the number one position in contact lenses worldwide. In 1989 J & J and drug giant Merck & Co., Inc. entered into a joint venture--Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.&mdash酶 develop OTC versions of Merck's prescription medications, initially for the U.S. market, later expanded to Europe and Canada. One of the first product lines developed by this venture was the Mylanta brand of gastrointestinal products.

Burke and Clare retired in 1989 and were succeeded by three executives: CEO and Chairman Ralph S. Larsen, who came from the consumer sector; Vice-Chairman Robert E. Campbell, who had headed the professional sector; and President Robert N. Wilson, who had headed the pharmaceutical sector. The three men were responsible for overseeing the network of 168 companies in 53 countries.

Larsen moved quickly to reduce some of the inefficiencies that a history of decentralization had caused. In 1989 the infant products division was joined with the health and dental units to form a broader consumer products segment, eliminating approximately 300 jobs in the process. Over the next two years, the reorganization was extended to overseas units. The number of professional operating departments in Europe was reduced from 28 to 18 through consolidation under three primary companies: Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Medical, and Johnson & Johnson Professional Products. In 1990, meantime, J & J formed Ortho Biotech Inc. to consolidate the company's research in the burgeoning biotechnology field, an area J & J had been active in since the 1970s.

Dealmaking in the 1990s and Beyond

J & J was able to counter increasing criticisms of rising healthcare costs in the United States and around the world in the 1990s due in part to the company's longstanding history of social responsibility. The company pioneered several progressive programs including child care, family leave, and 'corporate wellness' that were beginning to be recognized as healthcare cost reducers and productivity enhancers. In addition, weighted average compound prices of J & J's healthcare products, including prescription and OTC drugs and hospital and professional products, grew more slowly than the U.S. consumer price index from 1980 through 1992. These practices supported the company's claim that it was part of the solution to the healthcare crisis. In 1992 J & J instituted its 'Signature of Quality' program, which urged the corporation's operating companies to focus on three general goals: 'Continuously improving customer satisfaction, cost efficiency and the speed of bringing new products to market.'

J & J grew at a relatively slow pace in the early 1990s, in part because of the difficult economic climate. Revenues increased from $11.23 billion in 1990 to $14.14 billion in 1993, an increase of just 26 percent. A series of acquisitions in the mid-1990s, however, ushered in a period of more rapid growth, with revenue*****ting $21.62 billion by 1996, a leap of 53 percent from the 1993 level. The skin care line had received a boost in 1993 through the purchase of RoC S.A. of France, a maker of hypoallergenic facial, hand, body, and other products under the RoC name. More significant was the acquisition the following year of Neutrogena Corporation for nearly $1 billion. Neutrogena was well-known for its line of dermatologist-recommended skin and hair care products. J & J spent another billion dollars in 1995 for the clinical diagnostics unit of Eastman Kodak Company, which was particularly strong in the areas of clinical chemistry, which involves the analysis of simple compounds in the body, and immuno-diagnostics. In 1997 J & J combined its existing Ortho Diagnostics Systems unit with the operations acquired from Kodak to form Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. (LifeScan remained a separately run diagnostics company.)

Another subsidiary that grew through acquisitions in this period was Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., which had been spun off from Ethicon in 1992 to concentrate on endoscopic, or minimally invasive, surgical instruments. J & J acquired Indigo Medical, which specialized in minimally invasive technology in urology and related areas, in 1996, while Biopsys Medical, Inc., specializing in minimally invasive breast biopsies, was purchased in 1997. Another large acquisition occurred in 1996 when J & J spent about $1.8 billion for Cordis Corporation, a world leader in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases through its stents, balloons, and catheters. In 1997, in exchange for several consumer products, J & J acquired the OTC rights to the Motrin brand of ibuprofen pain relievers from Pharmacia & Upjohn. Other important developments during this period included the 1995 introduction of an Acuvue disposable contact lens designed to be worn for just one day but priced at a reasonable level, and the 1995 U.S. approval of the antacid Pepcid AC, an OTC version of Merck's Pepcid that was developed by the Johnson & Johnson-Merck joint venture.

The company's aggressive program of acquisition continued in the late 1990s, beginning with the 1998 purchase of DePuy, Inc. for $3.7 billion in cash, J & J's largest acquisition yet. DePuy was a leader in orthopedic products, such as hip replacement devices. J & J already marketed one of the leading knee replacement devices in the United States, making for a nice fit between the two companies. On the negative side, J & J was forced to initiate a restructuring in 1998 following a number of difficulties. J & J had been a pioneer in the market for coronary stents, devices used to keep arteries open following angioplasty, but its stent sales fell from $700 million in 1996 to just over $200 million in 1998 after competitors introduced second-generation stents and J & J did not. Also troubled was the firm's pharmaceutical operation, which in 1997 and 1998 had seen nine drugs in the development pipeline fail in testing, fail to get government approval, or be delayed. In late 1998 J & J announced that it would reduce its workforce by 4,100 and close 36 plants around the world over the succeeding 18 months. Taking $697 million in restructuring and in-process research and development charges, J & J aimed to save between $250 million and $300 million per year through this effort.

To bolster its drug R & D efforts, J & J completed its first major pharmaceutical deal since the 1961 purchase of Janssen Pharmaceutica. In October 1999 J & J merged with major biotechnology firm Centocor, Inc. in a $4.9 billion stock-for-stock transaction, the largest such deal in company history. With Centocor and Ortho Biotech under its wing, J & J was now one of the world's leading biotech firms. Soon after the merger with Centocor was completed, the FDA approved a key Centocor-developed drug, Remicade, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Centocor was also developing other pharmaceuticals in the areas of cancer, autoimmune diseases, and cardiology. Also in 1999 J & J acquired the dermatological skin care business of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.--which was primarily made up of the Aveeno brand--for an undisclosed amount.

Despite its late 1990s troubles, J & J reported record results for 1999, earning $4.17 billion on revenues of $27.47 billion. Net earnings had nearly quadrupled since 1989, while net sales nearly tripled over the same period. The year 2000 got off to a rough start for the company, however, as it was forced to withdraw from the market a prescription heartburn medication, Propulsid, after the drug had been linked to 100 deaths and hundreds of cases of cardiac irregularity. Propulsid had nearly $1 billion in sales in 1999. Also in early 2000, J & J joined with General Electric Company's GE Medical Systems unit, Baxter International Inc., Abbott Laboratories, and Medtronic, Inc. in a venture to create a global Internet-based purchasing exchange for healthcare providers.

Principal Subsidiaries: Advanced Sterilization Products; Centocor; Cordis Corporation; DePuy; Ethicon, Inc.; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.; Independence Technology; Indigo Medical, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc.; Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation; Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc.; Johnson & Johnson Medical; Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. (50%); Johnson & Johnson Sales and Logistics Company; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.; LifeScan, Inc.; McNeil Consumer Healthcare; McNeil Specialty Products Company; Neutrogena Corporation; Noramco, Inc.; Ortho Biotech Inc.; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.; Ortho Dermatological; Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Personal Products Company; R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute; Therakos, Inc. The company has additional subsidiaries in Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Scotland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Australia, China, Egypt, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Morocco, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, and Zimbabwe.

Principal Operating Units: Consumer and Personal Care Group; Medical Devices and Diagnostics Group; Pharmaceuticals Group.

Principal Competitors: Abbott Laboratories; Affymetrix, Inc.; Alberto-Culver Company; American Home Products Corporation; Amgen Inc.; Aventis; Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; Baxter International Inc.; Bayer AG; Beckman Coulter, Inc.; Becton, Dickinson & Company; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Carter-Wallace, Inc.; Colgate-Palmolive Company; Dade Behring Inc.; The Dial Corporation; Eli Lilly and Company; Genentech, Inc.; The Gillette Company; Glaxo Wellcome plc; Kimberly-Clark Corporation; L'Or茅al USA, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; Nestl茅 S.A.; Novartis AG; Perrigo Company; Pfizer Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; The Procter & Gamble Company; Roche Holding Ltd.; SmithKline Beecham plc; St. Jude Medical, Inc.; Unilever; United States Surgical Corporation.

Further Reading:

Alsop, Ronald, 'Johnson & Johnson (Think Babies!) Turns Up Tops,' Wall Street Journal, September 23, 1999, p. B1.
Barker, Robert, 'Picture of Health: Johnson & Johnson Seems to Have Cured What Ailed It,' Barron's March 30, 1987, pp. 15+.
Barrett, Amy, 'J & J Stops Babying Itself,' Business Week, September 13, 1999, pp. 95--97.
'Changing a Corporate Culture,' Business Week, May 14, 1984, pp. 130+.
Dumaine, Brian, 'Is Big Still Good?' Fortune, April 20, 1992, pp. 50--60.
Easton, Thomas, and Stephan Herrera, 'J & J's Dirty Little Secret,' Forbes, January 12, 1998, pp. 42--44.
Fannin, Rebecca, 'The Pain Game,' Marketing and Media Decisions, February 1989, pp. 34--39.
Foster, Lawrence G., A Company That Cares: One Hundred Year Illustrated History of Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, N.J.: Johnson & Johnson, 1986, 175 p.
Guzzardi, Walter, 'The National Business Hall of Fame,' Fortune, March 12, 1990, pp. 118--26.
Harris, Roy J., Jr., and Elyse Tanouye, 'Johnson & Johnson to Buy Neutrogena in Bid to Boost Consumer-Products Unit,' Wall Street Journal, August 23, 1994, p. A3.
Hwang, Suein L., 'J & J to Acquire Unit of Kodak for $1.01 Billion,' Wall Street Journal, September 7, 1994, p. A3.
Jacobs, Richard M., 'Products Liability: A Technical and Ethical Challenge,' Quality Progress, December 1988, pp. 27--29.
Johnson & Johnson: Global Expansion in the Face of Intense Competition, Mountain View, Calif.: Frost & Sullivan, 1993.
Kardon, Brian E., 'Consumer Schizophrenia: Extremism in the Marketplace,' Planning Review, July/August 1992, pp. 18--22.
Keaton, Paul N., and Michael J. Semb, 'Shaping up That Bottom Line,' HRMagazine, September 1990, pp. 81--86.
Langreth, Robert, and Ron Winslow, 'At J & J, a Venerable Strategy Faces Questions,' Wall Street Journal, March 5, 1999, p. B1.
Leon, Mitchell, 'Tylenol Fights Back,' Public Relations Journal, March 1983, pp. 10+.
Matthes, Karen, 'Companies Can Make It Their Business to Care,' HR Focus, February 1992, pp. 4--5.
McLeod, Douglas, and Stacy Adler, 'Tylenol Death Payout May Top $35 Million,' Business Insurance, May 20, 1991, pp. 1, 29.
Moore, Thomas, 'The Fight to Save Tylenol,' Fortune, November 29, 1982, pp. 44+.
Murray, Eileen, and Saundra Shohen, 'Lessons from the Tylenol Tragedy on Surviving a Corporate Crisis,' Medical Marketing and Media, February 1992, pp. 14--19.
O'Reilly, Brian, 'J & J Is on a Roll,' Fortune, December 26, 1994, pp. 178--80+.
Rublin, Lauren R., 'More Than a Band-Aid: Johnson & Johnson's Has a Strong Prescription for Growth,' Barron's April 17, 2000, pp. 37--38, 40, 42.
Silverman, Edward R., 'J & J Will Slash 4,100 Positions,' Newark Star-Ledger, December 4, 1998.
------, 'More Than Medicine: Johnson & Johnson's CEO Defends the Company's Slow-Growing Divisions,' Newark Star-Ledger, June 18, 2000.
Smith, Lee, 'J & J Comes a Long Way from Baby,' Fortune, June 1, 1981, pp. 58+.
Waldholz, Michael, 'Johnson & Johnson Defends Emphasis on Long-Term Growth As Profit Surges,' Wall Street Journal, August 8, 1985.
Weber, Joseph, 'A Big Company That Works,' Business Week, May 4, 1992, pp. 124--32.
------, 'No Band-Aids for Ralph Larsen,' Business Week, May 28, 1990, pp. 86--87.
Winslow, Ron, 'Head Start: Johnson & Johnson Finds an Elusive Gene and Races to Exploit It,' Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2000, pp. A1+.
------, 'J & J Agrees to Buy DePuy for $3.5 Billion,' Wall Street Journal, July 22, 1998, p. A3.
Winters, Patricia, 'J & J Sets Nighttime Tylenol,' Advertising Age, February 18, 1991, pp. 1, 46.
------, 'Tylenol Expands with Cold Remedies,' Advertising Age, August 27, 1990, pp. 3, 36.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 36. St. James Press, 2001.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:49:53 | 显示全部楼层
强生公司创办发展史

公司观点:

我们的信条:我们相信,我们的首要责任是医生,护士和病人,母亲和父亲和所有其他人使用我们的产品和服务。在满足他们的需求,我们所做的一切都必须是高质量的。我们必须不断努力降低成本,以保持合理的价格。客户订单必须迅速,准确。我们的供应商和分销商必须有一个合理的利润的机会。我们有责任向我们的员工,男性和女性在世界各地与我们一起工作的人。每个人都必须被视为独立的个体。我们必须尊重他们的尊严,赞赏他们的优点。在他们的工作,他们必须有一种安全感。必须公平和充分的补偿,工作环境必须清洁,有序,安全。我们必须注意的方法来帮助员工履行他们对家庭的责任。必须让员工在提出建议和申诉。对于那些合格的就业,发展和进步,必须有平等的机会。我们必须具备称职的管理人员,他们的行为必须公正并符合道德。我们生活在其中的社区和工作,并在国际社会以及我们负责。我们必须做好公民 - 支持优秀作品和慈善机构,并承担我们的公平份额的税收。我们必须鼓励公民的改进和更好的健康和教育。我们必须保持良好的秩序,我们很荣幸的使用,保护环境和自然资源的财产。我们的最终责任是我们的股东。企业经营必须获得可靠的利润。我们必须尝试新的构想。必须坚持研究工作,开发革新项目和错误支付。必须购买新设备,提供新设施,推出新产品。必须建立储备,以备不时之需。当我们根据这些原则运作,股东应该获得合理的回报。关键日期:

关键日期:

1886年:约翰逊兄弟开始在新泽西州新不伦瑞克,生产敷料。
1887年:公司成立为强生公司。
1893:强生婴儿粉。
1921年:创可贴创可贴品牌做他们的首演。
1924年:开始与强生(Johnson&Johnson)有限公司在英国设立海外扩张。
1932年:罗伯特·约翰逊,被称为“一般,”作为总统的领导接管。
1943年,约翰逊写道:该公司的信条。
1944年:公司在纽约证券交易所上市。
1959年:麦克尼尔实验室(麦克尼尔实验室)被收购。
1960年:麦克尼尔实验室推出过度的柜台交易(OTC)止痛药泰诺。
1961年:杨森制药公司被收购。
1975年:通过一个明显的价格下跌,泰诺转化成一个大众市场的产品。
1982年:泰诺篡改悲剧发生。
1988:一次性的ACUVUE隐形眼镜。
1989年:J&J和默克公司组建合资公司,默克公司的处方药开发OTC版本。
1994年:露得清公司被收购。
1995年:默克公司和强生公司推出的甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药交流;公司收购伊士曼柯达公司的临床诊断单元。 1996年:强生公司收购Cordis公司。 1998年:DePuy公司,公司被收购,并在全公司启动重组。 1999年:Centocor公司,公司合并与J&J

公司发展历程:

强生公司(J&J)是美国最受尊敬的公司之一,在世界上最大的医疗保健公司之一,一个最多元化。其业务分为三个业务分部:医药,产生39%的收入和61%的营业收入;专业,占了36%的收入和27%的营业收入和消费国,其25%的收入和12%的营业收入。强生公司的制药产品 - 这是奥索 - 麦克尼尔制药,西安杨森制药公司,和Centocor等品牌出售 - 包括计划生育,精神疾病,胃肠病学,肿瘤学,疼痛管理,和其他领域的药物。专业分部包括外科手术和病人护理设备和设备,诊断产品,关节置换,一次性隐形眼镜。该公司的知名的消费产品线,包括强生婴儿护理系列,露得清皮肤和头发护理系列,泰诺和布洛芬的止痛药,肥胖为Stayfree女性卫生用品,口腔护理恒通线,创可贴品牌创可贴,Imodium AD腹泻处理,胃肠产品Mylanta,甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药AC酸控制器。 J&J产生其在美国以外的收入的一半左右,通过其网络的190个运营公司在51个国家和它的营销组织,在超过175个国家和地区销售。

早期的历史:从医用敷料婴儿润肤霜

J&J的历史可追溯到19世纪后期,约瑟夫·利斯特发现,空气中的细菌传染源在手术室时,引发了罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊的想象力,新英格兰药剂师。约翰逊与他的兄弟,詹姆斯·伍德·约翰逊和爱德华·美赞臣联手,而三于1886年开始生产敷料在新不伦瑞克,新泽西州,有14名员工在一个前墙纸厂。

由于制表人的推荐的灭菌方法 - 喷洒石炭酸的手术室 - 被认为是不切实际和繁琐,强生公司(成立于1887年)发现了一个现成的市场,其产品。由于手术后感染死亡的比例是相当高的医院都渴望找到一个解决方案。

J&J的第一个产品是医疗化合物粘合剂混合使用改进的膏药。此后不久,该公司设计了一个柔软,脱脂棉和纱布包扎,和罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊的梦想实现了。开始批量生产,并大量被运往美国各地的敷料。到1890年,J&J用干热消毒绷带。

细菌学实验室成立于1891年研究了提振,次年,该公司已满足了公认的无菌产品的要求。通过引入干热,蒸汽和整个制造过程中的压力,J&J能够保证无菌绷带。粘性绷带在1899年得到进一步提高时,外科医生的合作,强生公司推出了基于氧化锌橡皮膏强,并克服了许多问题困扰着许多患者对皮肤的刺激。 J&J的第四原来的设计是消毒羊肠线缝合方法的改进。

从一开始,J&J是防腐剂外科手术的倡导者。在1888年,公司发表防腐处理伤口,医师使用的文本多年的现代方法。同年,B.基尔默弗雷德,弗雷德·基尔默开始了他45年的限制,为科学主任强生公司一位著名的科学和医学作家,诗人乔伊斯·基尔默的父亲写了有影响力的文章为强生公司的刊物,包括红十字会票据及红十字会斜挎。医生,药剂师和鼓励广大市民使用防腐剂的方法,J&J产品被提拔。

RW约翰逊于1910年去世,并成功担任董事长,由他的弟弟詹姆斯。当时,该公司开始快速增长。为了保证源公司的纺织材料的需求日益增加,强生公司于1916年购买奇科皮制造公司。 1919年在加拿大成立首个国际分支机构。几年后,在1923年,罗伯特·约翰逊的儿子,罗伯特·约翰逊和J.苏厄德·约翰逊,把周围的世界巡回演唱会,说服了他们,J&J应扩大海外,强生(Johnson&Johnson)有限公司成立于大英国一年以后。多元化继续创可贴品牌创可贴和强生婴儿霜(强生婴儿爽身粉曾在1893年首次亮相),公司的第一个女性卫生产品,Modess卫生巾,于1927年首次亮相于1921年引进。

1932年至1963年:一般在头盔

年轻的罗伯特·约翰逊,谁是被称为“将军”,已经加盟该公司,同时还作为一个手磨在他十几岁。 25岁的他已经成为一个公司的副总裁,并在1932年,他当选为总统。约翰逊形容为动态具有敏锐的责任感和不安,已经达到准将军衔在第二次世界大战和战争生产委员会副会长担任。

将军坚信下放业务,他是强生公司的组织结构,部门和分支机构分别给予自主权,直接到自己的业务的原动力。这项政策正好与药品,卫生用品,纺织品进入。在罗伯特·约翰逊的任期内,手术包和礼服制造的分工变得公司Surgikos;卫生巾生产部门最初称为Modess分工,然后成为个人护理产品公司;节育产品的监督下奥索制药公司;和缝合业务单独划分成为爱惜康公司在将军的领导下,每年的销售收入同比增长从$ 11亿美元至700亿美元,在1968年的时候,他的死亡。

继他的父亲的铅的社会问题,作为一个冠军,约翰逊谈到了有利于提高最低工资标准,改善工厂的条件,并强调企业的社会责任。约翰逊称,对管理层来说,对待工人的尊重和创建计划,提高劳动者的技能,更好地准备他们在现代工业社会中的成功。约翰逊在1943年写了一个信条,概述了公司的社会责任四个方面:第一,其客户;第二向其雇员;社区和环境的第三和第四的股东。对高跟鞋的信条来公司的变化,从家族企业到上市公司,强生公司在1944年的纽约证券交易所挂牌上市。

1959年,J&J收购麦克尼尔制药公司,制造商的非阿司匹林(乙酰氨基酚)的止痛药泰诺 - 这是当时只能通过处方。收购后的短短一年内,麦克尼尔泰诺推出的非处方(OTC)药物。此外,在1959年,Cilag的化学公司,一家瑞士制药公司,在两年内购买,由西安杨森制药公司,主要抗精神病药氟哌丁苯(Haldol),已在1958年推出的制造商购买。

约翰逊在1963年退役。虽然他仍然活跃在商业,家庭以外的第一次担任主席,该公司去。约翰逊的直接继任者是菲利普·霍夫曼,人,就像将军,已经开始担任船务文员,他的工作方式的阶梯。在霍夫曼的为期十年的董事长,J&J的国内和海外子公司蓬勃发展。霍夫曼是另一家公司的信徒在权力下放,并鼓励培训当地专家,在各自国家督战。外国管理人员组织起来,而不是地理上的产品线,一个人在该领域的专业知识与工厂经理报告。

20世纪60年代 - 70年代:增加促进消费产品

在20世纪60年代初,联邦监管医疗保健行业增加。当詹姆斯·伯克 - 从宝洁公司的营销部门谁曾来J&J - 强生公司的国内经营公司在1966年就任总统,该公司一直在寻找方法来增加利润来自其消费品抵销可能放缓,在产品的专业部门。通过吸引顶尖营销人从宝洁公司(Procter&Gamble),伯克是能够放在一起几个非常成功的广告活动。首次推出的无忧无虑和适你意卫生巾进入市场,占主导地位的承认女性产品的领导者,金佰利。通常仅限于女性杂志,女性卫生用品广告是低调和谨慎的。 J&J根据伯克的方向,采取更开放的做法,并在电视广告无忧无虑适你意。到1978年,J&J夺取了一半的市场。同时,公司通过1973年收购这家德国公司的OB制造商卡尔·哈恩博士联系,扩大其女性卫生线卫生棉条的品牌。

伯克的最大挑战之一是泰诺。自从收购了J&J麦克尼尔实验室,泰诺的制造商,药物已经作为一个高价位的产品销售。伯克看到其他的可能性,并在1975年,他得到了机会,他在等待。百时美施贵宝公司介绍Datril的广告,它有相同的成分,如泰诺,但一个显着较低的价格提供。伯克说服强生公司董事长理查德·塞拉斯,他们应该满足本次大赛头泰诺的价格下降,以满足Datril的。伯克与塞拉斯的批准,泰诺了进入大众营销领域,下调价格,止跳动不仅Datril的,但头号Anacin的作为。这标志着美国家用产品公司,制造商阿纳辛,麦克尼尔实验室之间正在进行的战斗开始。

塞拉斯,霍夫曼的PROT茅克茅,在1973年成为董事长,并担任此职位三年。伯克在1976年成功塞拉斯担任CEO和董事会主席,大卫·克莱尔被任命为总裁。强生公司一直保持在其业务中的许多部门之间的平衡,特别是与大众消费产品和专业产品。没有一个单一的强生公司产品占公司总销售额多达百分之五。伯克在掌舵,消费类产品也开始积极推动,成为强生公司的泰诺止痛药一个卖方。

与此同时,伯克并没有把他的后背作为一个领导者在专业的医疗产品公司的地位。 1977年5月体外的医学专科,肾透析和静脉注射治疗产品的制造商,成为该公司的一部分。三年后,J&J公司,收购Iolab晶状体白内障手术的制造商,并有效地进入眼部护理领域的眼科药品。 1981年公司扩展了其参与眼部护理通过前沿隐形眼镜收购。增加内部发展的关键护理产品导致Critikon,公司在创建于1979年,并于1983年创建强生公司医院服务制定和实施企业的营销方案。

20世纪80年代泰诺篡改悲剧

1982年9月J&J悲剧发生时,七人死于摄入股价已经与氰化物的泰诺胶囊。广告被立即取消,,强生公司召回所有的泰诺产品从商店的货架。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)后发现,篡改在零售层面,而不是在制造过程中已经做了,J&J留下的问题,如何保存其头号产品和声誉。在死亡后的一周内,强生公司的股票下跌了18%,它的首要竞争对手的产品,Datril阿纳辛-3,在这样的需求,供应有序。

J&J是无法弥补其损失,通过多种营销策略。该公司跑了一个时段的广告,解释如何交换为片剂或退款,并与新闻界密切合作,直接回应了记者的提问作为一种手段,让公众最新的泰诺胶囊。该公司还放置了一个2.50美元的优惠券在报纸上在全国范围内关闭所有的泰诺产品泰诺胶囊补偿消费者,他们可能已经丢弃在篡改事件,并提供购买泰诺等形式的奖励。

几周之内中毒事件,FDA发出指引,防篡改包装为整个食品和药物行业。要加强公众在其产品的信心,强生公司采用三层防护,两个多推荐,泰诺在商店的货架上被放回。的氰化物中毒的短短几个月内,强生公司获得其疼痛缓解市场的份额,并很快恢复了90%以上,其前客户。到1989年泰诺销售分别为500亿美元每年,并在1990年扩展到新兴的感冒药市场一些泰诺冷产品线次年看到泰诺PM推出,睡眠援助。詹姆斯·伯克精明的,但说实话,泰诺篡改事件的处理赢得了他一个斑点在全国营业厅名人堂,在1990年颁发的荣誉。在这一事件的诉讼终于在1991年解决,几乎是十年后的最初篡改。麦克尼尔实验室落户为3500万美元,拥有超过30名幸存者中毒。

1989年,百时美施贵宝推出了一个积极的广告攻势,定位Nuprin品牌布洛芬止痛药泰诺直接竞争。此举加剧了市场份额的侵蚀,从美国家用产品公司的布洛芬布洛芬。这两种产品都声称优于泰诺制订的对乙酰氨基酚。

有一定数量的其他重要进展,在20世纪80年代后半期。 J&J在1986年收购了强生公司,在家里为糖尿病患者的血液监测产品制造商。同年,该公司扩大了其世界领先地位,婴幼儿护理用品Penaten有限公司,通过收购德国的市场领导者。前沿更名为卫康隐形眼镜,收购之后,强生公司推出的ACUVUE品牌于1988年在美国一次性隐形眼镜。强生ACUVUE隐形眼镜的普及有助于推动卫康在全球隐形眼镜的头号位置。 J&J和制药巨头默克公司在1989年,公司订立的合资企业 - 强生公司默克消费者制药有限公司 - 酶默克公司的处方药,OTC版本的开发,最初是为美国市场,后来扩大到欧洲和加拿大。由这家合资公司开发的第一个产品线胃肠产品Mylanta品牌。

伯克和克莱尔在1989年退休,并成功地由三位高管:CEO和主席拉尔夫·拉森,来自消费领域;副主席罗伯特·E·坎贝尔,谁为首的专业部门和罗伯特N.威尔逊总统,谁为首的医药板块。该三名男子分别为负责监察网络在53个国家和地区的168家企业。

拉森迅速减少一些效率低下,造成了权力下放的历史​​。婴儿产品部门在1989年加入了与健康和牙科单位,消除了约300个就业机会,在这个过程中,形成一个更广泛的消费产品分部。在接下来的两年里,重组延伸到海外单位。专业经营部门在欧洲的数量从28个减少到18个,通过整合在三个主要公司:爱惜,强生医疗和强生(Johnson&Johnson)的专​​业产品。同时,强生公司成立于1990年,奥托生物技术公司,以巩固公司在新兴的生物技术领域的研究,占地面积强生公司一直活跃在20世纪70年代以来。

在20世纪90年代的并购交易和超越

J&J是能够对付日益增加的医疗成本上升,在美国和世界各地的部分原因是由于该公司的悠久的历史的社会责任,在20世纪90年代的批评。公司率先推出了几个累进节目,包括儿童保健,家庭休假,“企业健康”,已开始被承认为医疗成本减速器和生产力促进。此外,强生公司的医疗产品,包括处方药和非处方药,医院和专业的产品,价格加权平均复合增长更慢比美国消费者物价指数从1980年到1992年。这些做法,支持公司的说法,这是解决医疗保健危机的一部分。 J&J在1992年制定了“签名质量”计划,敦促该公司的经营企业专注于三个总体目标:“不断提高客户满意度,成本效益和将新产品推向市场的速度。”

J&J在20世纪90年代初增长速度相对缓慢,部分原因是由于困难的经济气候。收入增加14.14十亿美元,同比增长仅为26%,在1993年从1990年的11.23十亿美元。然而,一系列的收购在20世纪90年代中期,迎来了一个更快速的增长期,收入*****婷1996年的21.62十亿美元从1993年的水平,53%的飞跃。护肤系列已经在1993年得到了长足的通过中华民国SA法国购买防过敏的面部,手部,身体,和其他产品在中华民国的国名,制造者。更重要的是近100亿美元的收购次年露得清公司。露得清皮肤科医生推荐的护肤和护发产品线是​​众所周知的。 J&J了另一个10亿美元在1995年,伊士曼柯达公司,这是特别强的领域涉及身体的简单化合物的分析,临床化学,免疫诊断,为临床诊断单元。在1997年,J&J结合其现有的骨科诊断系统单元从柯达收购与经营,形成邻临床诊断公司(LifeScan公司仍然是一个单独运行诊断公司。)

另一家附属公司在此期间通过收购增长是爱惜康内镜外科公司,已分拆从爱惜康内镜,微创,手术器械在1992年集中。 J&J收购靛蓝医疗,微创技术在泌尿外科及相关领域的专业,在1996年,而活检组织医疗,公司,专业从事微创乳腺活检,是在1997年购买的。另一家大型的收购发生在1996年,当J&J Cordis公司,通过其支架,气球,导管治疗心血管疾病的全球领导者花了约1.8亿美元。在1997年,在多个消费产品的交换,J&J收购OTC权利,法玛西亚普强布洛芬止痛药布洛芬品牌。其他重要的发展在此期间的1995年出台的强生ACUVUE一次性接触镜片设计到被穿短短一天,但价格在一个合理的水平,并在1995年美国批准的抗酸剂甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药交流,的OTC版本默克公司的甲磺噻脒[抗消化性溃疡药是开发的合资强生公司默克。

该公司积极的收购计划,继续在20世纪90年代后期,开始与1998年购买DePuy公司,公司为$ 3.7亿美元的现金,强生公司的最大收购。 DePuy公司是一个领先的骨科产品,如髋关节置换设备。 J&J已经上市在美国领先的膝关节置换装置,使得两家公司之间的一个很好的契合。在消极的一面,J&J的一些困难,被迫于1998年启动重组。 J&J已经在市场上的先驱,冠脉支架,用于保持动脉打开后,血管成形术的设备,但其支架的销售额下跌从1996年的7亿美元刚刚超过$ 200万,在1998年后,竞争对手推出了第二代支架和J&法官没有。也是困扰该公司的药品经营,在1997年和1998年曾见过9药物发展管道在测试中失败了,未能得到政府批准,或者被推迟。在1998年年底,强生公司宣布,它将减少其劳动力4,100,在随后的18个月内,世界各地的近36家工厂。以6.97亿美元的重组过程中的研究和开发费用,J&J的目的是拯救美元之间,250万元和300万元,每年通过这方面的努力。

为了加强其药物研发力度,J&J自1961年以来购买杨森制药完成其第一大药品交易。 1999年10月,J&J $ 4.9亿美元的股票,股票的交易,在公司历史上最大的此类交易中主要的生物技术公司Centocor公司,公司合并。与Centocor Ortho生物在其翼下,J&J是目前世界领先的生物技术公司之一。与Centocor合并完成后不久,美国FDA批准了一项关键的的Centocor公司开发药物,单抗,用于治疗类风湿关节炎。 Centocor公司还开发领域的癌症,自身免疫性疾病和心脏病的其他药品。此外,在1999年,J&J收购皮肤科皮肤护理业务庄臣父子公司 - 这是主要由Aveeno的品牌 - 一个未公开的金额。

尽管20世纪90年代后期的麻烦,J&J报道1999年创纪录的业绩,收入4.17十亿美元27.47十亿美元的收入。净资产收益自1989年以来已翻了近两番,而净销售额较上年同期几乎增加了两倍。 2000年得到了该公司在艰难中起步,但是,它被迫退出市场,胃灼热药物处方,Propulsid,药后已联系到100人死亡,数百心脏不规则的情况下。 Propulsid 1999年的近100亿美元的销售额。此外,在2000年初,强生公司加入通用电气公司的GE医疗系统事业部,百特国际公司,雅培公司,美敦力公司在创业,医疗服务提供者创建一个全球性的互联网为基础的采购交流。

主要子公司:高级灭菌产品; Centocor公司Cordis公司DePuy公司的爱惜康公司,爱惜康内镜外科公司独立技术靛蓝医疗,公司,杨森制药公司强生公司消费者产品公司;强生公司开发公司,强生公司保健系统公司,强生公司医疗强生公司默克消费者制药有限公司(50%),强生(Johnson&Johnson)的销售及物流公司,强生公司视力保健公司强生麦克尼尔消费者医疗保健公司;麦克尼尔特产公司;露得清公司;公司Noramco;奥托生物技术公司;邻临床诊断公司;邻皮肤病;奥索 - 麦克尼尔制药,个人护理产品公司RW约翰逊医药研究所; Therakos,该公司有额外的附属公司,在加拿大,阿根廷,巴西,智利,哥伦比亚,墨西哥,巴拿马,秘鲁,乌拉圭,委内瑞拉,奥地利,比利时,捷克共和国,法国,德国,希腊,匈牙利,爱尔兰,意大利,荷兰,波兰,葡萄牙,俄罗斯,苏格兰,斯洛文尼亚,西班牙,瑞典,瑞士,土耳其,英国,澳大利亚,中国,埃及,香港,印度,印度尼西亚,以色列,日本,韩国,马来西亚,摩洛哥,巴基斯坦,菲律宾,新加坡,南非,台湾,泰国,阿联酋,津巴布韦。

主营业务单位:消费品和个人护理组,医疗器械和诊断集团药业集团。

主要竞争对手:雅培公司,Affymetrix公司阿尔贝托 - 卡尔弗公司,美国家用产品公司,安进公司,安万特公司,博士伦注册成立,Baxter国际公司,德国拜耳公司,贝克曼公司流式细胞Dickinson&公司施贵宝公司;卡特 - 华莱士,高露洁棕榄公司; Dade Behring公司公司Dial公司,礼来公司,Genentech公司,吉列公司,葛兰素威康公司金佰利公司;美国L'或茅人,公司,美敦力公司,默克公司,美国明尼苏达矿业及制造公司;雀巢茅SA诺华公司,百利高公司,辉瑞公司,法玛西亚公司,宝洁宝洁公司罗氏控股有限公司,史克必成有限公司,圣犹达医疗用品公司,联合利华,美国外科公司。

更多阅读:

艾尔索普,罗纳德,“约翰逊&约翰逊(想想婴儿!)变成了上衣,”华尔街日报“9月23日,1999年,p。 B1中。
巴克,罗伯特,'健康的图片:强生(Johnson&Johnson)似乎已经固化什么Ailed的,“巴伦周刊”1987年3月30日,第15页。
巴雷特,艾米,'J&J停止Babying的本身,“商业周刊”,1999年9月13日,第95 - 97。
改变企业文化,“商业周刊”5月14日,1984年,第130页。
杜梅因,布赖恩,是大还是不错的?“ “财富”,1992年4月20日,第50 - 60页。
伊斯顿,托马斯和斯蒂芬·埃雷拉,'J&J的肮脏的小秘密“,”福布斯“,2010年1月12日,1998年,第42 - 44。
范宁,丽贝卡,“疼痛的游戏,”市场营销和媒体决定,1989年2月,第34 - 39。
劳伦斯·福斯特,本集团关怀:一百年图史强生公司,新泽西州新不伦瑞克,强生公司,1986年,项175 p。
古查底,沃尔特,“全国商业名人堂,”财富1990年3月12日,第118 - 26。
哈里斯,罗伊J.,Jr。和伊利斯Tanouye的,“约翰逊&约翰逊出价购买露得清提高消费者产品单位”,“华尔街日报”8月23日,1994,页。 A3。
黄某,L. Suein,'J&J收购柯达单位,为1.01亿美元,“华尔街日报”9月7日,1994年,页。 A3。
理查德·雅各布斯,“产品责任:技术和伦理挑战,”质量进展,1988年12月,第27页 - 29。
强生公司:面对激烈的竞争,加州山景城:Frost&Sullivan的1993全球扩张。
顿,布赖恩E.消费者精神分裂症:在卖场中的极端主义,规划审查,7月/ 1992年8月,第18 - 22页。
顿,保罗·N.,和迈克尔·森布,“塑造了这一底线,'HRMagazine,1990年9月,第81 - 86。
罗伯特Langreth和罗恩·温斯洛,在J&J,一个尊者战略面临的问题,“华尔街日报”3月5日,1999年,第。 B1中。
莱昂,米歇尔,“泰诺还击,”公共关系杂志,1983年3月,第10页。
Matthes把凯伦,公司可以使他们的业务,将心比心,“人力资源聚焦,1992年2月,第4 - 5。
麦克劳德,道格拉斯,和Stacy阿德勒,泰诺死亡赔付可能突破3500万美元,“商业保险,1991年5月20日,第1页,29。
摩尔,托马斯,“打救泰诺,”财富,11月29日,1982年,第44页。
穆雷,艾琳和Saundra Shohen,“劫后余生的企业危机的经验教训从泰诺悲剧上,”医疗市场营销和媒体,1992年2月,第14页 - 19。
奥赖利,布赖恩,“J&J是上卷,”财富“1994年12月26日,第178 - 80 +。
Rublin,劳伦R.,超过创可贴:强生公司的增长具有很强的处方,“巴伦周刊4月17,2000年,第37 - 38,40,42。
西尔弗曼,爱德华R.,“强生公司将削减4,100位置,”纽瓦克明星纪事报,1998年12月4日。
------“超过医学:强生公司的首席执行官捍卫本公司的缓慢增长分部,”纽瓦克明星纪事报,2000年6月18日。
史密斯,李,'J&J来一个很长的路要走,从婴儿,“财富”,1981年6月1日,第58页。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:50:26 | 显示全部楼层
生物技术老大安进的创业发展史

Company Perspectives:

Fulfilling Amgen's mission to be the world leader in developing and delivering cost-effective therapeutics based on advances in cellular and molecular biology depends upon the company's ability to make continued progress in unlocking the power of cellular and molecular biology to develop products that satisfy the unmet medical needs of patients worldwide.

Company History:

Amgen, Inc. stands out in the biotechnology industry as one of the only businesses to transform itself from a drug development company into a pharmaceutical manufacturer while simultaneously maintaining steady sales. The largest independent biotechnology company in the United States, Amgen owes its transformation mostly to two gene-spliced drugs, Neupogen and Epogen. The company continues to develop human bio-pharmaceutical products using proprietary recombinant DNA technology.

A Slow Start in Biotechnological Research: 1980s

Amgen was formed in 1980 by a group of scientists and venture capitalists with a $19 million private-equity placement from venture capital firms and two major corporations. It began operations in 1981 in Thousand Oaks, California, in close proximity to thriving research centers at three nearby universities, among them UCLA and the California Institute of Technology. The company's impressive scientific advisory board included several members of the National Academy of Sciences; its first chairman and CEO was George B. Rathmann, former vice-president for research and development in the diagnostics division of Abbott Laboratories.

Through public stock offerings in 1983, 1986, and 1987, the company raised the capital needed to pursue its research, yet in its first five years, Amgen recorded losses. By 1986 it showed a humble profit, but 96 percent of its revenues that year came not from products, but from interest income and research partnerships with major drug companies. At this time, Amgen had five genetically engineered drugs undergoing human testing, the most promising of which was erythropoietin, or EPO, a synthetically produced hormone that promotes red blood cell production. The drug was targeted for people with kidney disease on dialysis, a process that lowers the kidneys' natural production of EPO. The product proved to be a marvel of genetic engineering: In January 1987, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine detailed the positive results of a study involving EPO and 25 kidney-dialysis patients.

Because the worldwide market for patients with kidney failure was about $350 million a year in the mid-1980s, and because there were then fewer than 200,000 kidney-dialysis patients in the United States, Amgen's EPO was accorded "orphan drug" status by the FDA, an exclusive seven-year marketing rights privilege. However, many argued that EPO was not just a drug for those suffering kidney failure; its applications for anemia, a common side effect of certain treatments for cancer, arthritis, and AIDS, were unlimited. The drug could also be used to reduce the need for blood transfusions during surgery.

With those uses in mind, in 1985 Amgen sold Johnson & Johnson the right to market EPO for treatment of anemia in the United States and for all uses in Europe. The previous year, Amgen had formed a joint venture with Kirin Brewery Company, Ltd. of Japan, according Kirin the right to manufacture and market EPO in Japan. Amgen, with rights to the U.S. dialysis market, began building an EPO manufacturing facility near its headquarters even before the company was granted its first patent for its recombinant human erythropoietin, named Epogen. Two days after receiving the patent in October 1987, Amgen filed with the FDA.

While awaiting FDA approval on Epogen, Amgen continued to develop other drugs, including a vaccine against hepatitis B, three products to stimulate the body's disease-fighting system, and two kinds of interferon, or antiviral substances. In 1985 Amgen became the first company to genetically engineer granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), part of the family of substances that compel cells in the bone marrow to produce disease-fighting white blood cells. Researchers were hopeful it would help fight bacterial infections and certain types of cancer, as well as offset the effects of radiation and chemotherapy.

The Race to Market EPO: 1989

As the first company to isolate and patent the human gene responsible for making EPO and to reproduce the drug in large quantities by transplanting the isolated gene into the ovarian cells of hamsters, Amgen had patent rights to genetically engineered EPO. One of Amgen's competitors, Genetics Institute (GI), was the first to isolate a purified strain of the protein and had received a patent on natural, highly purified EPO. The two companies now sued each other for patent infringement in an acrimonious battle due to its high stakes. GI had licensed its patents to Chugai Pharmaceutical Company, which planned to market EPO in the United States through Upjohn Company. Amgen subsequently asked the International Trade Commission (ITC) to block imports of Chugai's EPO, but an ITC judge declined to do so in January 1989.

While Amgen was awaiting the FDA's green light, Johnson & Johnson's Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation slapped Amgen with a lawsuit over what Ortho claimed would be "spillover sales" resulting from non-dialysis use of Epogen. Ortho sought an injunction to delay marketing EPO until a dispute over terms of the two companies' joint venture was settled. At the same time, several U.S. senators were trying to change the orphan drug law and claimed that EPO should not qualify for exclusivity because it had huge money-making potential. Amgen determined that EPO's annual tab for dialysis patients would run $6,000. Medicare would pick up the bill for dialysis patients, most of whom were hit by the huge cost of dialysis itself.

These legal tangles caused further delay in FDA approval of Epogen, which allowed competitors to pull ahead in their efforts to market the drug and meant financial losses for Amgen, which was poised to begin immediate shipments to patients with end-stage renal, or kidney, disease. In March 1989, a federal judge ruled that Ortho and Amgen had to submit a joint application for FDA approval of EPO, suggesting that cross-licensing might be a solution. Meanwhile, GI was nearing the finish line in its own labs.

On June 1, 1989, the FDA approved Amgen's EPO for treatment of anemia in kidney dialysis patients. The next day Amgen shipped its first batch of the drug to UCLA Medical Center. By the end of June, it had sold nearly $17 million worth of the drug--its first product after nine years in business. Legal wrangles continued, but Amgen had the market to itself. GI's version of EPO awaited FDA approval. Around this time, CEO Rathmann passed his title to longtime CFO Gordon M. Binder, the author of Amgen's deal with Kirin Brewery.

In 1990 the U.S. House of Representatives cleared a measure amending the orphan drug law, but EPO was exempt due to furious lobbying by both GI and Amgen. A federal magistrate ruled that Amgen was infringing on GI's patent, and vice versa; the ruling seemed again to aim at a cross-licensing agreement. Encouraged, GI stepped up its attack on Amgen by asking a federal court to freeze the company's profits on EPO sales, and sought an injunction to stop Amgen from producing the drug. The court's decision held that both companies had valid patents and that each was guilty of infringing on the other's patent. The decision allowed Chugai to use Amgen's patented genetic coding to produce the drug in Japan, then import and sell it. Meanwhile, Amgen's product sales went from $2.8 million in 1989 to roughly $140 million in 1990. In March 1990, a federal judge ordered Amgen and GI to exchange royalty-free cross-licenses on EPO. In a significant setback for Amgen, the judge ruled that GI's product, Marogen, was also covered by the orphan drug status.

An International Market Share with Neupogen

Meanwhile, expectations were great for Amgen's new drug, Neupogen. In clinical studies, G-CSF performed well, and the initial market for Neupogen was calculated to be twice that of Epogen. The hope was that the drug's use would extend beyond chemotherapy patients to include others who would benefit from increased immunization. Since G-CSF was not an orphan drug, many other biotechnology companies were simultaneously racing to bring their version of the product to market. Amgen received the first U.S. patent on recombinant G-CSF in 1989, and FDA approval for Neupogen was issued in February 1991. Amgen retained full domestic marketing rights to the drug, while Kirin Brewery had exclusive license for sales of G-CSF in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.

In March 1991, Amgen received more good news: A federal court of appeals issued the final verdict in Amgen's ongoing struggle with Genetics Institute over EPO, and the decision favored Amgen. The judge blocked GI from selling its version of the anti-anemia drug, ruling that GI had failed to demonstrate just how it made the purified form of EPO from human urine--the factor by which GI's product differed from Amgen's. Thus, Amgen was given a legal monopoly over domestic EPO sales.

Amgen had shipped about $53 million of Neupogen by May 1991. Total sales for the drug for 1991 exceeded $260 million, and the company became known as a biotechnology leader. Amgen closed 1992 as the first biotech company to top $1 billion in sales and the only one to near the status of independent global pharmaceutical company. In the fall of 1992, Amgen tapped Kevin W. Sharer, president of the telephone giant MCI Communications Corporation, to fill the post of president and COO, and in 1993, Amgen announced an expansion of its research and development investment to nearly double what its 1992 expenditure had been. New research focused on blood-cell growth factors, soft-tissue growth factors, and neurobiology, inflammation, and nucleic acid therapeutics. The company also began exploring growth factors to help heal burns, surgical wounds, bone damage, and other injuries. As of early 1993, Amgen had more than 90 percent of the white blood cell stimulator market in the United States and no competition in the red blood cell stimulator market. Neupogen's growth potential remained considerable. That year, Amgen's revenues reached $1.4 billion, with Neupogen sales increasing 32 percent to provide 52 percent of the company's annual total sales of $719 million.

Throughout 1994, the growth rate of Amgen's products continued to increase. Neupogen sales reached $829 million after the FDA approved its use in bone marrow transplants. Epogen sales also increased 23 percent to reach $729 million once the FDA boosted the target hematocrit level for chronic renal failure. Amgen agreed with Kirin Brewery to develop and market megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF) as a platelet stimulator. It also joined with Amcell Corp. in commercializing certain cell separation products developed by Amcell in a strategic extension of Amgen's clinical research with stem cell factor and Neupogen. In December 1994, Amgen purchased Synergen, acquiring that company's product pipeline, and was awarded a national medal of technology for development of Epogen, the first biotechnology company and only one of five corporations ever to receive this highest presidential tribute for the commercial application of technology.

Throughout this period of growth, Amgen's legal battles continued. In 1991, Amgen was ordered to pay Johnson & Johnson's subsidiary, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, $164 million in damages for selling Epogen in violation of their 1985 EPO marketing agreement during the 19 months it took for Ortho to bring its product to the market. However, in a turnaround case in 1992 Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay Amgen $90 million for failing to comply with another aspect of the same 1985 agreement. According to the contract, Johnson & Johnson was to develop both a hepatitis B vaccine and interleukin 2, and Amgen was to receive royalties from those products. Johnson & Johnson failed to meet those obligations.

Legal battles claimed much of Amgen's time through 1998. In 1995, the battle between Amgen and GI took another turn. The European Patent Office Board of Appeals had upheld a Kirin-Amgen patent on EPO in 1994. Now a district court in Massachusetts barred GI from asserting its U.S. patent, upholding the 1990 decision in favor of Amgen. The longstanding dispute with Johnson & Johnson's Ortho subsidiary was resurrected again in 1998 when a judge ordered Amgen to pay $200 million to remedy its violation of the sales agreement, while at the same time accepting Amgen's method for calculating "spillover sales" and ordering Johnson & Johnson to pay Amgen's $100 million expenses for the lengthy dispute. But a second dispute with Johnson & Johnson cropped up shortly afterward over whether NESP, (novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein), a new, longer-acting version of EPO, qualified as a new or improved drug. The court eventually awarded all rights to the new version of Epogen to Amgen, making NESP its first big drug success since 1991. Then, Transkaryotic began testing its own rival to Epogen, moving to reopen and challenge a patent infringement suit.

Mapping the Human Genome: 1990s

Bringing new products to market required investments in genomics, which involved mapping and understanding human genetic structure. Amgen's R & D budget increased accordingly throughout the 1990s: from $182 million in 1992 to $663 million in 1998. The company hoped to optimize its potential for developing and delivering product candidates, including those targeting neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases, cancer support, and endocrine disorders, such as obesity and diabetes.

In 1995 Amgen continued its research on MGDF with Kirin, while on another front the two companies obtained license rights on thrombopoietin (TPO), a platelet stimulator, from Denmark's Novo Nordisk, putting them ahead of Genentech in the race to introduce a TPO product. That year, too, Amgen joined with NPS Pharmaceuticals in developing the latter's Norcalcin to treat hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients and continued research on the "fat mouse" obesity gene licensed from Rockefeller University. Sales for the year were $1.8 billion.

The year 1996 saw breakthroughs in testing on another Amgen product, Infergen, used to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C. Scientists at Amgen also identified a novel, naturally occurring protein with potential applications in osteoporosis and cloned a gene essential to the growth and proliferation of most cancer cells. The company stepped up clinical development of several new medicines: glia-derived neuro-factor (GDNF) with applications to Parkinson's; recombinant leptin as an anti-obesity drug; keratinocite growth factor (KGF) for preventing side effects of chemo and radiation therapy; and development with Kirin for NESP (novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein). On the business front, the company enjoyed a solid year financially with revenues exceeding $2 billion, an increase of 15 percent from the year before. Net income increased 26 percent to $680 million. Amgen licensed Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical the right to develop, manufacture, and commercialize Amgen's consensus interferon (CIFN), a novel, non-naturally occurring type one interferon, except in the United States and Canada.

The Goal for 2001

The launch of Infergen in October 1997 set Amgen on track toward achieving its goal of releasing five new products in five years. The company filed and received license applications for Stemgen, a drug that generated the growth of stem cells and led to a faster recovery of blood cells after chemotherapy, and made clinical trial progress on MGDF, KGF, leptin, and NESP. It also in-licensed the worldwide rights to Guilford Pharmaceuticals' FKBP-neuroimunophilins, oral compounds that showed signs of treating neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Yet despite Amgen's laboratory successes, the year was one of mixed financial results. A significant change in the government's Medicare reimbursement policy led to an unanticipated reduction in the rate of growth for Epogen, which nonetheless brought in $1.1 billion. Worldwide Neupogen sales at $1 billion were also negatively affected by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the continued tightening of healthcare budgets in some European countries, and the improved antiviral therapies that reduced the incidence of depleted white blood cell levels in AIDS patients. In 1998 Amgen received further bad news when it was discovered that the standard dose of Epogen could be reduced by a third if injected under the skin rather than being administered intravenously. Far more tragic, though, was the news that a high number of deaths were reported among heart patients who used Epogen.

Still Amgen continued to build upon its foundation in 1998 and 1999. Research and development efforts were driven by internal research, in-licensing, and selective acquisition activities. In 1999 it invested in Abarelix, developed by Praecis Pharmaceuticals to reduce testosterone levels as part of treating prostate cancer. It also applied for FDA approval for an experimental drug to treat rheumatoid arthritis. During this time, Amgen shares rocketed 140 percent by the first quarter of 1999. With sales of its hallmark drugs Epogen and Neupogen, as well as Intergen still rising, and first quarter 1999 earnings up 32 percent, Amgen was prepared to enter the next century as the biggest biotechnology company in the world.

Principal Subsidiaries: Amgen Australia Pty Ltd.; Amgen N.V.; Amgen Canada Inc.; Amgen Greater China Ltd.; Amgen GmbH (Germany); Amgen S.A. (France); Amgen S.p.A. (Italy); Amgen K.K. (Japan); Amgen B.V. (Netherlands); Amgen-Biofarmaceutica (Portugal); Amgen S.A. (Spain); Amgen (Europe) AG (Switzerland); Kirin-Amgen, Inc. (Switzerland); Amgen Limited (U.K.); Amgen Sales Corporation (West Indies).

Further Reading:

"Amgen Inc.," Wall Street Journal, January 13, 1993, p. B4.
"Amgen Patent Claim on Drug for Anemia Is Rejected by Court," Wall Street Journal, May 1, 1990, p. A8.
"Amgen Wins Ruling in Its Patent Dispute," Wall Street Journal, April 18, 1990, p. A12.
Andrews, Edmund, "Drug Ruling Is a Setback for Amgen," New York Times, March 15, 1990, p. D1.
----, "Rival Seeking to Freeze Amgen Profits on Drug," New York Times, January 31, 1990, p. D5.
Armstrong, Larry, "Churning Out Earnings As the Economy Starts to Slow," Business Week, July 31, 1989, p. 30.
----, "Two Rising Stars," Business Week, April 3, 1992.
"Blood Money," Economist, April 20, 1991, p. 86.
Flynn, Julie, "The Hormone That's Making Amgen Grow," Business Week, March 16, 1987, p. 96.
Giltenan, Edward, "Bioprofits," Forbes, January 7, 1991, p. 10.
Hamilton, Joan, "Amgen Is Hot--And Bothered," Business Week, January 23, 1989, p. 40.
----, "A Drug That Could Replace Transfusions--If It Ever Reaches the Market," Business Week, March 27, 1989, p. 60.
----, "The Gene Jockeys Are Finally Seeing Some Green," Business Week, July 2, 1990, p. 77.
Jacobs, Paul, "The Cutting Edge: Amgen Faces Hazards to Its Health," Los Angeles Times, November 30, 1998, p. C1.
"Leptin in Clinicals for Obesity," Applied Genetics News, June 1996.
"Looking for the Biotech Blockbusters," Fortune, July 7, 1986, p. 109.
Marcial, Gene, "Biotech Fans Love Amgen's One-Two Punch," Business Week, August 13, 1990, p. 104.
Mitchell, John, "Life with Amgen: A Four Part Series," Thousand Oaks Star, September 13--17, 1998.
Noah, Timothy, "U.S. Aide Urges Cut in Payments on Amgen Drug," Wall Street Journal, June 15, 1990, p. B4.
Palmer, Jay, "Trader," Barron's, March 11, 1991, p. 71.
Petruno, Tom, "Amgen: Getting the Worst of Both Worlds," Los Angeles Times, February 1, 1993, p. D1.
Pollack, Andrew, "Focus of Attention in Biotechnology," New York Times, May 24, 1991, p. D6.
Rundle, Rhonda, "Amgen Inc. Is Expected to Be Awarded $90 Million from Johnson & Johnson," Wall Street Journal, September 10, 1992, p. B8.
----, "Amgen Wins Biotech Drug Patent Battle," Wall Street Journal, March 7, 1991, p. A3.
----, "FDA Approves Amgen Cancer Drug, but Rivals Loom," Wall Street Journal, February 22, 1991, p. B1.
Savitz, Eric, "Fulfilling Their Promise," Barron's, September 25, 1989.
Stipp, David, "Genetics Institute, Japanese Firm Seek Injunction Against Amgen in Patent Case," Wall Street Journal, January 31, 1990, p. B2.
Teitelman, Robert, "Amgen: Biotech's Next Big Attraction?," Financial World, January 26, 1988, p. 12.
"Uncorking the Genes," Barron's, May 5, 1986.
Welling, Kathryn, "The Conversion of Paul," Barron's, September 7, 1987.
Wyatt, Edward, "What Price Promise?," Barron's, April 10, 1989.


Source: International Directory of Company Histories, Vol. 30. St. James Press, 2000.
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-16 08:50:55 | 显示全部楼层
生物技术老大安进的创业发展史

公司观点:

Amgen公司的使命履行在开发和提供成本效益的疗法根据细胞和分子生物学的进步成为世界的领导者依赖于公司的能力解锁的细胞和分子生物学的力量开发产品,满足未得到满足的医疗继续取得进展全球患者的需要。

公司发展历程:

安进(Amgen),公司作为唯一的企业之一,在生物技术行业中脱颖而出,把自己从药物开发公司医药制造商,同时保持稳定的销售。在美国最大的独立的生物技术公司Amgen公司欠其转化查Neupogen的基因拼接药物,和Epogen居多。该公司将继续开发人力使用专有重组DNA技术的生物制药产品。

在生物技术研究:20世纪80年代起步较慢,

Amgen公司成立于1980年,由一群科学家和风险投资1900万美元从风险投资公司和两个大型企业的私募股权配售。它开始于1981年在加利福尼亚州Thousand Oaks,在接近蓬勃发展研究中心附近的三个大学,其中加州大学洛杉矶分校和加州理工学院。该公司令人印象深刻的科学顾问委员会包括几个国家科学院成员,其董事长兼首席执行官乔治·B拉斯曼雅培诊断师的研究和发展,前副总统。

通过公开发行股票的,在1983年,1986年和1987年,公司募集资金需要追求其研究,但在其第一个五年中,安进公司录得亏损。到1986年,它表明一个不起眼的利润,但96%的收入,一年来,不是从产品,而是来自利息收入及与各大制药公司的研究合作伙伴关系。这时,安进公司有五个基因工程药物进行人体试验,其中最有前途的是促红细胞生成素,促红细胞生成素,合成产生的激素,促进红血细胞的生产。这种药物是针对患有肾脏病透析,一个过程,降低肾脏的自然生产的EPO。该产品被证明是基因工程的一个奇迹:1987年1月,新英格兰医学杂志“的一篇文章中详述的一项研究涉及EPO和25例肾透析患者的积极成果。

由于肾功能衰竭患者的全球市场是大约$ 350万一年在20世纪80年代中期,和因为有是那么不到20万肾透析患者在美国Amgen公司的EPO被给予“孤儿药”的状态由FDA 7年的营销,独家权利的特权。然而,许多人认为,EPO不只是那些患肾功能衰竭的药物及其应用某些治疗癌症,关节炎,艾滋病,贫血,常见的副作用是无限的。该药物也可以使用,以减少需要在手术过程中的输血。

考虑到那些用途,在1985年,安进销售强生公司市场EPO治疗贫血在美国和欧洲的所有用途的权利。去年,安进公司已经形成了一家合资企业,日本麒麟啤酒公司,根据麒麟有权制造和销售EPO在日本。安进(Amgen),美国的透析市场的权利,公司甚至在其总部附近被授予其第一项专利名为Epogen的重组人促红细胞生成素,EPO制造工厂开始建设。两天后收到的专利在1987年10月,安进公司与FDA提出。

在等待FDA批准的Epogen,Amgen公司继续开发其他药物,包括B型肝炎疫苗,三种产品来刺激人体的抗病战斗系统,和两种干扰素,抗病毒物质。安进公司在1985年成为第一家基因工程粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),物质的家庭的一部分,迫使细胞在骨髓中产生疾病的白血细胞。研究人员希望这将有助于对抗细菌感染和某些类型的癌症,以及抵消放疗和化疗的效果。

市场EPO:1989年的种族

Amgen公司作为第一家进行隔离和孤立的基因移植到仓鼠的卵巢细胞,人类基因专利负责制作EPO和重现大量药物,遗传工程EPO的专利权利。 Amgen公司的竞争对手之一,遗传学研究所(GI),是第一株的蛋白质分离纯化,并已获得了专利的自然,高度纯化的EPO。现在,这两家公司在激烈的战斗中,由于其高风险的专利侵权起诉对方。 GI中外制药公司,该公司计划经济向市场EPO在美国普强公司通过其专利许可。 Amgen公司随后要求国际贸易委员会(ITC)以阻止进口中外的EPO,但在1989年1月的ITC法官拒绝这样做。

虽然安进公司正在等待FDA的绿灯,强生公司的骨科医药总公司掴Amgen的官司骨科声称将“溢出”产生的非透析使用的Epogen销售。骨科寻求禁制令,直到两家公司的合资纠纷解决延迟营销EPO。与此同时,一些美国参议员试图改变孤儿药法,并声称,EPO应该不符合排他性的,因为它有巨大的赚钱潜力。 Amgen的决心,EPO的年度标签透析患者的运行$ 6,000。医疗透析患者的透析本身巨大的成本,其中多数被击中便拿起账单。

这些法律缠结引起进一步延迟FDA批准Epogen的,这让竞争对手提前拉在他们的努力推销药物,安进(Amgen),这是准备立即开始出货给患者终末期肾病或肾意味着财务损失,疾病。 1989年3月,一名联邦法官裁定,骨科及Amgen公司必须提交一份联合应用FDA批准的EPO,表明交叉许可可能是一个解决方案。同时,GI接近终点在自己的实验室。

1989年6月1日,FDA批准安进的EPO治疗贫血,肾透析患者。第二天Amgen公司推出其第一批次的药物,到加州大学洛杉矶分校医疗中心。到六月底,已售出近$ 17亿美元的药物 - 它的第一个产品,经过9年的业务。法律争议不断,但,Amgen公司本身的市场。 GI的版本EPO等待FDA的批准。大约在这个时候,CEO拉斯曼通过长期CFO,Amgen的处理与麒麟啤酒的作者戈登·宾德的所有权。

1990年,美国国会众议院清除了措施,修订孤儿药法,,但EPO由GI和Amgen公司免除因大怒游说。联邦裁判官裁定Amgen公司侵犯胃肠道的专利,反之亦然;执政党似乎再次瞄准交叉许可协议。鼓励,胃肠加紧攻击Amgen公司要求联邦法院冻结EPO销售公司的利润,并申请禁制令停止Amgen公司生产药物。法院的判决认为,这两家公司拥有的有效专利,而且每个犯侵犯他人专利。允许中外使用Amgen的专利基因编码产生的药物在日本的决定,然后导入并卖掉它。同时,Amgen公司的产品销量从1989年的280万美元在1990年约为140亿美元。 1990年3月,一位联邦法官下令Amgen和GI交换对EPO的免专利费的交叉许可。为Amgen在一个重大的挫折,法官裁定,GI的的产品,Marogen,也涵盖了孤儿药地位。

查Neupogen的国际市场份额

同时,期望伟大的Amgen公司的新药物,查Neupogen。在临床研究中,G-CSF表现良好,查Neupogen计算最初的市场两倍的Epogen。希望的是,药物的使用将超越化疗的患者,包括其他人将受益于增加免疫。由于G-CSF是不是孤儿药,许多其他生物技术公司,同时赛车,使他们的版本的产品推向市场。 Amgen公司收到第一的美国专利于1989年,FDA批准用于查Neupogen重组G-CSF是1991年2月发行。 Amgen公司保留完整的国内销售权的药物,而麒麟啤酒销售G-CSF在日本,韩国和台湾的独家许可权。

1991年3月,安进(Amgen)获得更多的好消息:一位联邦上诉法院发出的最终判决Amgen公司的持续斗争与遗传学研究所在EPO,并决定青睐Amgen公司。法官阻止GI销售版本的抗贫血药,换算GI未能证明它是如何使EPO从人尿 - 大兵的产品不同的因子从Amgen的纯净的形式。因此,Amgen公司被赋予了合法的垄断超过国内EPO销售。

Amgen公司已经由1991年5月出货量约5300万美元查Neupogen。药物1991年的总销售额超过2.6亿美元,该公司成为被称为生物技术的领导者。 Amgen公司关闭1992年作为第一个生物科技公司突破十亿美元的销售额,唯一一个独立的全球性制药公司的地位附近。在1992年的秋天,安进(Amgen)窃听电话巨头MCI通信公司总裁凯文·夏尔,补差价的总裁兼首席运营官,并于1993年,安进(Amgen)宣布扩大其研究和开发投资将增长近一倍什么1992年开支。新研究主要集中在血细胞生长因子,软组织生长因子,神经生物学,炎症,以及核酸疗法。该公司还开始探索生长因子,以帮助治疗烧伤,手术伤口,骨损伤,及其他伤害。截至1993年初,安进(Amgen)有90%以上的白血细胞刺激市场在美国并没有在红血细胞刺激市场竞争。 NEUPOGEN的增长潜力仍然相当可观。这一年,Amgen公司的收入达1.4亿美元,与查Neupogen的销售增加了32%,提供52%的公司每年的销售总额为7.19亿美元。

纵观1994年,Amgen公司的产品的增长速度继续增加。查Neupogen销售达到8.29亿美元,骨髓移植后,FDA批准其使用。 Epogen的销售额也增长了23%,达到7.29亿美元一旦FDA提振了慢性肾功能衰竭的目标血细胞比容水平。 Amgen公司同意与麒麟啤酒开发和推广作为血小板刺激巨核细胞生长和发育因子(MGDF)。它还加入了与Amcell Corp Amcell发展的战略延伸的的Amgen的临床研究与干细胞因子和查Neupogen的某些细胞分离产品的商业化。 1994年12月,安进公司购买Synergen,收购该公司的产品流水线,以及被授予一个国家金牌技术Epogen的第一个生物技术公司的发展和只有五分之一的企业曾经以接收这个总统致敬最高技术的商业应用。

纵观这一时期的增长,Amgen公司的法律战继续。 1991年,安进公司被勒令支付强生公司的子公司,邻药业公司,1.64亿美元赔偿金,花了19个月为邻,将其产品的市场销售Epogen的过程中违反其1985年EPO营销协议。然而,在1992年出现转机的情况下,强生(Johnson&Johnson)被勒令支付Amgen公司9000万美元与1985年相同协议的另一个方面未能遵守。根据合同,强生公司是开发乙肝疫苗和白细胞介素2,和Amgen是从这些产品中收取特许使用费。强生公司未能履行这些义务。

法律战声称1998年的Amgen的时间通过多。在1995年,Amgen和胃肠道之间的战斗又反过来。欧洲专利局上诉委员会维持了麒麟 - 安进EPO专利于1994年。现在,在马萨诸塞州地方法院禁止GI断言其在美国的专利,赞成Amgen公司坚持1990年的决定。强生公司的骨科子公司的长期争议,复活,再次在1998年时,一名法官下令Amgen公司,以支付2亿美元纠正其违反销售协议,而在同一时间接受Amgen的“销售外溢”的计算方法和订购强约翰逊Amgen公司支付$ 100万费用冗长的纠纷。但第二个争议与强生公司冒出不久之后是否NESP(小说红细胞生成刺激蛋白),一个新的,长效EPO版本,符合作为一个新的或改进的药物。法院最终授予的一切权利,安进的Epogen到新的版本,使NESP其自1991年以来的第一个大毒成功。然后,开始测试Transkaryotic Epogen的,移动的专利侵权诉讼重新开放,并挑战自己的对手。

绘制人类基因组:20世纪90年代

将新产品推向市场所需的投资涉及映射和理解人类基因的结构基因组学,。 Amgen公司的R&D预算相应增加,整个20世纪90年代:从1992年的1.82亿美元到1998年的6.63亿美元。公司希望开发并提供候选产品,包括针对神经变性疾病和炎症性疾病,癌症支持,内分泌失调,肥胖和糖尿病等,以优化其潜力。

1995年,安进公司继续其研究MGDF与麒麟,而另一条战线上,这两家公司获得特许权血小板生成素(TPO),一个血小板的刺激,来自丹麦的诺和诺德公司,把他们提前基因泰克在比赛中引入TPO产品。这一年,也Amgen公司加入与NPS制药公司在后者的发展Norcalcin的透析患者治疗甲状旁腺功能亢进症和继续研究的“肥鼠”肥胖基因来自洛克菲勒大学的许可。年内销售额分别为1.8亿美元。

1996年另一个Amgen公司的产品,本药,用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎的科学家在Amgen的患者也确定了一种新型的,自然产生的蛋白质与骨质疏松症的潜在应用,并克隆了一个基因的生长和增殖的至关重要看到在测试中的突破大多数癌症细胞。公司加强高达几个新的药物的临床发展:神经胶质细胞来源的神经因子(GDNF)帕金森氏的应用;重组瘦素的抗肥胖药物; keratinocite生长因子(KGF),为了防止化疗和放射治疗的副作用;并发展与:NESP麒麟(小说红细胞生成刺激蛋白)。在业务方面,公司享受了坚实的一年财政收入超过$ 2亿美元,较前一年增长了15%。净收入增长了26%,元至680元亿美元。山之内制药Amgen公司许可的权利,开发,生产和商业化Amgen的共识干扰素(CIFN),除美国和加拿大外,一种新型的,非天然型干扰素。

2001年的目标

干复津在1997年10月推出的集安进公司发布五款新产品,在五年内实现其目标的轨道上走向。公司提交和接收牌照申请Stemgen,一种药物,产生的干细胞的生长,并导致化疗后血细胞恢复较快,MGDF,KGF,瘦素和NESP临床试验进展。它还授权的全球权利吉尔福德制药FKBP-neuroimunophilins治疗神经退行性疾病,包括帕金森氏症和阿尔茨海默氏症的迹象表明,口服化合物。然而,尽管安进公司的实验室的成功,今年是一个混合的财务业绩。政府的医保报销政策的à重大变化导致意料之外Epogen的增长,但在$ 1.1亿美元的速度减少。美元1亿美元的全球销售查Neupogen加强美元,在欧洲一些国家的医疗保健预算持续紧缩,以及改进的抗病毒治疗,减少贫艾滋病患者的白血细胞水平的发病率也受到负面影响。 Amgen公司在1998年得到进一步的坏消息,当它被发现,Epogen的标准剂量可减少三分之一,如果注射的皮肤下,而不是静脉给药。更为悲惨的是,虽然,有消息称,死亡人数高心脏病患者之间谁使用Epogen的报告。

尽管如此,安进公司在1998年和1999年在其基础上继续建立。研究和开发力度,带动内部研究,授权,和选择性的收购活动。在1999年投资开发在阿巴瑞克,由Praecis医药作为治疗前列腺癌的一部分,降低睾丸激素水平。它还申请FDA批准用于治疗类风湿关节炎的一种实验性药物。在此期间,Amgen公司的股价飙升了140%,由1999年第一季度。随着销售其标志药物Epogen和查Neupogen,以及InterGen公司仍在上升,1999年第一季度盈利增长32%,作为在世界上最大的生物技术公司Amgen公司准备进入下一个世纪。

主要附属公司:Amgen公司澳大利亚有限公司,安进NV Amgen的加拿大公司,安进公司大中华区(中国)有限公司联系Amgen公司(德国); Amgen公司SA(法国); Amgen的SPA(意大利); Amgen公司KK (日本);安进Amgen公司BV(荷兰); Amgen公司Biofarmaceutica(葡萄牙),Amgen公司SA(西班牙)Amgen公司(欧洲)公司(瑞士);麒麟安进公司(瑞士); Amgen公司有限公司(英国);销售公司(西印度群岛)。

更多阅读:

“安进公司,”华尔街日报1月13日,1993年,p。 B4。
“安进公司贫血的药物的专利索赔被法院拒绝,”华尔街日报“,1990年5月1日。 A8。
“Amgen公司荣获裁决其专利纠纷,”华尔街日报“4月18日,1990年,页。 A12。
埃德蒙·安德鲁斯,“药品裁决为Amgen一个挫折,”纽约时报“,3月15日,1990年,页。 D1中。
----“药物,寻求冻结Amgen公司利润的竞争对手,”纽约时报“1月31日,1990年,p。 D5。
阿姆斯特朗,拉里,“搅动了盈利,随着经济开始放缓,”商业周刊“7月31日,1989年,第。 30。
----“两个新星”,“商业周刊”1992年4月3日。
“血钱”,经济师,1991年4月20日。 86。
弗林,朱莉,“这使得Amgen的成长,”商业周刊“3月16日,1987年,第激素。 96。
爱德华Giltenan的“Bioprofits,”福布斯1月7日,1991年,。 10。
汉密尔顿,琼,“安进是热 - 困扰,”商业周刊“1月23日,1989年,页。 40。
----“的药物,它可以代替输血 - 如果它曾经达到的市场,”商业周刊“3月27日,1989年,第。 60。
----“基因骑师终于看到一些绿色,”商业周刊“1990年7月2日,第。 77。
雅各布,保罗,“切削刃:Amgen公司面临其健康的危害”,“洛杉矶时报”11月30日,1998年,p。 C1。
“瘦素在医院实习肥胖,”应用遗传学报“,1996年6月。”
“寻找生物大片,”财富“,1986年7月7日,第109。
马歇尔,基因,生物球迷喜欢Amgen的一两冲,“商业周刊”8月13日,1990年,页。 104。
米切尔,约翰,“生命与Amgen:四部分系列,”“千橡明星”,9月13日 - 17日,1998年。
诺亚,提摩太,“美国的助手敦促削减支付Amgen的药物,”华尔街日报6月15日,1990年,第。 B4。
帕尔默,周杰伦,“操盘手”巴伦周刊“3月11日,1991年,页。 71。
汤姆,Petruno“Amgen公司:最差两全其美,”洛杉矶时报2月1日,1993年,页。 D1中。
波拉克,安德鲁,“生物技术中的注意焦点,”纽约时报“5月24日,1991年,p。 D6中。
朗德尔,朗达,“安进公司预计,被授予强生公司”,“华尔街日报”1992年9月10日,第9000万美元。 B8。
----“安进公司赢得生物药品专利战,”华尔街日报1991年3月7日,第A3。
----“FDA批准Amgen的癌症药物,但对手织机,”华尔街日报2月22日,1991年,页。 B1中。
萨维茨,埃里克,“履行自己的诺言,”巴伦周刊“1989年9月25日。
斯泰普,大卫,“遗传学研究所,日本企业寻求禁令Amgen的专利案,”华尔街日报“1月31日,1990。 B2。
罗伯特Teitelman,“安进:生物技术的下一个大的吸引力,”金融世界,1988年1月26日,。 12。
“开一​​瓶的基因,”巴伦周刊“1986年5月5。
夺眶而出,凯瑟琳,“保罗的转换,”巴伦周刊“1987年9月7日。
悦,爱德华,“价格承诺”,“巴伦周刊1989年4月10日。


资料来源:公司历史,国际指南。 30。圣雅各福群出版社,2000。
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2013-8-16 08:52:24 | 显示全部楼层
中文的就可以了,英文的估计大家没有耐性看。
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2013-8-16 08:55:56 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-4-24 12:23

Powered by Discuz! X3.4运维单位:苏州豚鼠科技有限公司

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表